Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Seems you guys dislike Blandino too


melvin2345

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, TN05 said:

Blandino sucks. We were robbed a ton of times under him, including in the Super Bowl and all of last year with illegal hits on Cam.

You guys should be 4-0 right now. Hoping for a good game Sunday!

Man, as much as I wanted the Falcons to lose, that was not a BS call. It was the exact, fair call. Anything else would have been BS. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again... I would have loved to have seen the Lions win, but upon review, he's clearly down. If they don't review it, they never get a snap off in :08; and the rule says if you don't have any timeouts remaining and there's a review, there's a :10 run off. 

How exactly was Detroit robbed here? 

They shouldn't have thrown it short of the goal line. It's their own fault they're 3-1. Blame Stafford, not the refs.

IMG_3618.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, JawnyBlaze said:

I think they could have gotten a snap off in 8s. The rule was enforced correctly but it is a stupid ass rule that robbed the Lions. 

What if it was :06 left. Or :01? Is it a :stupid ass rule" then? I don't think setting the rule at :10 is unreasonable. Watch the clock next time a team runs a play and see how long it takes everyone to get back in position and run an actual play - not just spike it, either, because it was 4th down in this situation. Ten seconds is very reasonable.

There's plenty of things to shake your head at in the NFL. This isn't one. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, dldove77 said:

Again... I would have loved to have seen the Lions win, but upon review, he's clearly down. If they don't review it, they never get a snap off in :08; and the rule says if you don't have any timeouts remaining and there's a review, there's a :10 run off. 

How exactly was Detroit robbed here? 

They shouldn't have thrown it short of the goal line. It's their own fault they're 3-1. Blame Stafford, not the refs.

IMG_3618.jpg

They absolutely could have ran to the line and got a snap off

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In 2025 Sam Darnold had over 1k more passing yards than Bryce Young on 1 less pass attempt. Repeat that to yourself several times and let it sink in. I absolutely love it when people come on here and invoke Sam Darnold like some gotcha. Darnold is the physical prototype for what anyone needs in a franchise QB. All the physical tools. Few people thought he would put it all together on the mental side of the position. He used to make some of the worst decisions you would ever see. At times in the past he made up for that with absurd throws and athleticism. But make no mistake whatsoever no matter how you feel about our starting QB. Bryce Young is a completely opposite conundrum. He lacks virtually any and all physical tools and athleticism and his elite processing is really mediocre at best on a good day and horrific on a bad day. These are realities people should have already been addressing instead of quadrupling down in year four.
    • The nice thing about the timing of Bryce's contract at least is that it's going to match up with the 2027 Draft Class. No excuses, he either becomes Rams 2nd half Bryce year long, or we draft his replacement.  Nothing wrong with carrying Bryce on his 5th year expiring and a 1st round rookie waiting in the wings. Let the rookie sit until the trade deadline, deal Bryce to a needy team at the time, profit. 
    • Yeah they were bad QBs - but QB's that stayed on their teams for several years.  BY is better than all of those. 
×
×
  • Create New...