Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Replay Officials


ichigo1057

Recommended Posts

So I think this is an interesting topic to discuss. What do you guys think of how the NFL have done with replays at this point of the season

I think they still can't seem to get their poo together myself. Taking our game as an example, Cam's Superman dive that was ruled down on the line. By all accounts of the replay it showed that the ball crossed the line before any part of his body touched out and as a result should have been reversed to a TD. As we all know the officials ended up letting the play stand citing "Not enough evidence to over call the ruling on the field.". A bunch of BS personally but whatever we scored the next play. Compare that with what happened in the Jets vs. Patriots game where the runner briefly has the ball come loose but secures it before going out for what is ruled as a TD. The replay officials go back and look at this and from all replays shown there was no clear evidence to overturn the TD however they end up ruling it a fumble out of the end zone and as a result a touch back and Patriots ball. I know by all means every replay is different but jeez these guys need to be more consistent with their rulings. If there was no evidence on our call then by all means there should have been no evidence on the Jet's call as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the replay officials are doing a decent job, in my opinion (which is not from a trained expert as them) they still mess up a call every but that is going to happen. 

Also, I agreed with the call on the field and the replay of Cams run from Thursday. There was not definitive evidence that he crossed the goal line. There was not angle of the shot to confirm 100%.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Popsickle said:

I think the replay officials are doing a decent job, in my opinion (which is not from a trained expert as them) they still mess up a call every but that is going to happen. 

Also, I agreed with the call on the field and the replay of Cams run from Thursday. There was not definitive evidence that he crossed the goal line. There was not angle of the shot to confirm 100%.  

 

You realize that you can piece the different angles together, right? When you piece together the head on view with the side view, it was clearly a TD. It really doesn't matter since we scored a TD anyway, but that Pats/Jets call... holy fug.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Popsickle said:

I think the replay officials are doing a decent job, in my opinion (which is not from a trained expert as them) they still mess up a call every but that is going to happen. 

Also, I agreed with the call on the field and the replay of Cams run from Thursday. There was not definitive evidence that he crossed the goal line. There was not angle of the shot to confirm 100%.  

 

Someone with a basic understanding of math and angles could clearly decipher that Cam had crossed the plane before touching the ground.  I guess the replay officials must be 5 year old kids?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You realize that you can piece the different angles together, right? When you piece together the head on view with the side view, it was clearly a TD. It really doesn't matter since we scored a TD anyway, but that Pats/Jets call... holy fug.

It did matter.  Cost us a time out.  Imo they should always call touchdown when there is any question.  Then neither team has to waste a challenge and potential timeout.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Idk what Popsickle or the replay guys were looking at but it couldn't have been any clearer that Cam reached across the goal line before jis foot was oob...

 

Also just saw that Jets replay, holy poo that was awful... how tf is that a fumble???

At absolute worst, it should have been jets ball at the one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think everyone says Mike Evans because of size, but really they have different strengths and play styles.  Tmac is better on intermediate routes and not nearly as good at contested catches. 
    • At this point, it is criminal to go into the 2026 training camp/OTA's with XL penciled in as a #2 WR. The team must upgrade, either through free agency or the draft. If he cannot give 100% effort on significantly less snaps as a #4-6 WR(players like Tremayne have done that consistently) then I don't think you have a player worth rostering beyond the trade deadline. Offensively, we eventually have to upgrade to an NFL starting caliber C. It's been almost the length of time from Gross to Ikey since Kalil retired and we have below average to terrible C play. Love Mays as a BC-esque utility backup but he will never be an above average long term starting C.  The TE room is one of the worst in the NFL but it's a low usage position in this offense, so the investments are likely to be small, if any. I would never expect to see an elite TE in a Dave Canales offense. 100% agree on OL depth. We actually aren't bad there but BC will be gone, Mays is a UFA, Corbett is a UFA and Zavala has been both injured and bad. We have to bolster that depth again or resign guys like Mays and Corbett to keep that depth somewhat stable.
    • Bingo. The dude is a baller no doubt and I'd love to have him in a vacuum but like you said he's gonna fetch a haul so the only teams it really makes sense for are teams with an overall good roster who they feel an edge rusher like Crosby would out them over the top in terms of competing for SBs. I'd be looking st teams like the Pats, Bucs, Ravens, Seahawks, etc. It wouldn't be shocking to see him moved. He may be more valuable to a rebuilding team in the form of the draft assets he'd fetch than he is on the field. He should still have several more good years in the tank at 28 but by the time the Raiders can reasonably expect to rebuild he's gonna be on the decline.
×
×
  • Create New...