Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Well, it could be worse. The Colts owe Luck 30 Million Dollars guaranteed still.


JakeDel5674

Recommended Posts

Damn shame what happened with Luck. He had Super Bowl MVP potential. 

 

Best move the Colts made was getting Brissett - who I think is actually a decent QB. Give him a full offseason of preparation maybe he could have some success. But that would require the Colts to get a front office and head coach that would actually help a young QB succeed...tough thing to do, but I think Brissett could be the answer there. But this is the fuging Colts we’re taking about, who are owned by a pill popping drunk. So RIP Brissett.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, uncfan888 said:

We haven't done much better when it comes to cam.. If he wasn't such a beast, he'd probably be out of the league from the hits he's taken

 

we took Cam to a superbowl and if not for the league rigging it for old man manning Cam would have a ring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Take a look at the beating Cam has taken with us. Not like he would've faired any better here.

 

he would have a better defense around him here and like I already said we got Cam to a superbowl so we done a better job putting a team around Cam then indy has for Luck

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, TheCableGuy said:

 

he would have a better defense around him here and like I already said we got Cam to a superbowl so we done a better job putting a team around Cam then indy has for Luck

Team success and the quality of the defense has no impact at all on the beating the QB takes in our offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Team success and the quality of the defense has no impact at all on the beating the QB takes in our offense.

That guy is an idiot. I don't know why I even bother to respond to him.. He's just going to poo on any truth he can't handle like a little girl

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...