Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Internal investigation equals cover up?


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

This is Florio's theory.  Basically, the idea that the Panthers could keep the NFL at arm's length and tell them there's no need to investigate because they're already doing it themselves.

Hate to say it, but it actually does make some sense when you think about it.

Quote

 

When learning last night that the Panthers are investigating Panthers owner Jerry Richardson for allegations of workplace misconduct, my first thought was this: Why isn’t the NFL doing this?

I’m not alone. As one league source explained it, other teams wouldn’t have the luxury of conducting their own investigation. And few, if any, team personnel other than owners would ever get that level of consideration.

Part of the problem is that, as PFT reported last night, the Panthers told the NFL about the situation only after the Panthers started their own investigation, ultimately overseen by someone who owns part of the team — and thus is a PARTNER of the person who is the subject of the probe. And so the NFL has been caught flat-footed by what only can be perceived as an effort by the team to control the investigation, to manage the fallout, and to engineer the preferred outcome.

 

Quote

...pending an investigation. That same kind of investigation that the Panthers have decided to conduct regarding the person who owns the bulk of the Panthers, overseen by a person who owns part of the Panthers.

This doesn’t mean the NFL will continue to do nothing. But don’t be surprised if that’s what the NFL does; Richardson, after all, was one of the two owners who led the search for a Commissioner in 2006 — and one of the two owners who personally delivered the good news to the man who won the $200 million so far/$200 million to go (and maybe more) job on the fifth ballot.

Whatever it was that prompted the team owned by Richardson to mobilize an investigation against Richardson should prompt the NFL to do the same thing, and to treat Richardson the same way any other person connected to the NFL would be treated.

Concerns of inconsistency emerge regarding Panthers investigation

Let's be real.  If we found out the Patriots were conducting an "internal investigation" into misconduct by Bill Belichick, how many of us would accept that as valid?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Lombardi? Lol

guys that is very low on the list of things JR cares about. Did you read the article? He loves the NFL, the business side of things, keeping important people happy not the team or winning. His actions again and again prove this.

 

and yes this article makes a lot of sense and is typical of JR, he’s not a stupid man. Meddling owner gonna meddle, shocking

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, countryboi said:

So what happens if they find Jerry at fault? what are they going to do cut him? what punishment would be enough given that he is the owner of the team?

 

Do like the NBA did to Donald Sterling and banned him from the NBA. 

The NFL could do the same and then make him sale the team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, TPanther920 said:

At "fault" for what? No one has any idea what this is all about.

Does it matter?

Granted, everybody wants to know and there's not much out there.  But what we do know for now is that whatever it was is serious enough to warrant an investigation and lawyers being brought in.

That tells me enough to know somebody could be in deep fecal matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

This is Florio's theory.  Basically, the idea that the Panthers could keep the NFL at arm's length and tell them there's no need to investigate because they're already doing it themselves.

Hate to say it, but it actually does make some sense when you think about it.

 

Concerns of inconsistency emerge regarding Panthers investigation

Let's be real.  If we found out the Patriots were conducting an "internal investigation" into misconduct by Bill Belichick, how many of us would accept that as valid?

 

Uncovering misconduct after a cover up would be much worse than just doing an investigation and coming out with it. More than likely it won’t be a “cover up.” It’ll be a settlement essentially acknowledging wrong-doing without a huge media firestorm bc the NFL is leaking info week after week. 

Especially considering whatever then allegations are likely aren’t criminal. Why make it worse with an attempted cover up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The only thing I said was he was part of the staff that made part of the decisions, and that I am judging the decisions made by that group as a whole. As assistant GM, you can pretty much guarantee his input held more sway than an intern or the guy that takes coffee requests. Fitterer didn't operate in a vacuum. Neither does Morgan now. While Fitterer did have the ultimate decision, to say that Dan had no input in ranking boards, evaluating FAs, trade offers or anything else would be asinine. We all know he did. Otherwise what the hell was his job as assistant GM? He wouldn't have been kept for 3 years if he was arguing every decision Scott ever made.    And the actual quote was "Morgan has done a bang up job in the draft and FA. Compared to what the last guy did, he is kicking ass and taking names." So is XL kicking ass and Brooks taking names from last years draft or did I get it backwards? We took Wallace over Payton Wilson because he was an injury risk after trading up for a RB with a torn ACL? Which one of the kicking ass and taking names was that?  Maybe we should review the thousands of gameday posts calling for XL to get off the field because he's a bust and can't catch a cold. We could review the posts about Brooks but... And Wilson. He's at 118 tackles this season vs 36 for Wallace.  I gave credit to Dan for a good draft this year. But I'm also not ignoring last year's draft either since he did that one after the last guy too.  That's not a strawman. 
    • And then, in week 18, we can take Mayfield out of the game and whoop Bridgewater's @$$ for good measure! Let the former QB revenge train roll on!!
    • If we keep our guards in tact ($$$) and go with Mays at C, some OT depth would be nice. I think we should be happy about CB with Thornton's development (pre injury) and Smith Wade. I think Ransom is developing nicely, but I would like to see a FS type for situations. We suck at ILB and Edge (as a whole). We should be OK at RB.  I hope we sign Dowdle to a short contract. QB?  There are signs of hope and development.  (I don't like our backup QB) TE?  Good draft for TE, but I think we are developing with Evans, Sanders, and Tremble. WR?  A #2 with Coker and Horn in the slot.  XL?  What is that? We should be good in 2026. Morgan does more than draft.  Free agency has been strong too.  (Just emptying my brain on your comment--sorry)
×
×
  • Create New...