Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Week 15 - 4th Quarter Busted Play


dldove77

Recommended Posts

Perhaps this has already been covered, but there was a CMC run early in the fourth quarter Sunday that I believe was an option to pass back to Cam. If correct, it's a little disappointing that he chose not to pass back, because Cam was wide open with all eleven defenders on the other side of the field. Possible that McCaffrey just wasn't comfortable and played it safe. Maybe we'll see it again in the coming weeks. 

You can see in the first frame that he kind of pulls up and moves the ball to his right hand... we noticed from the stands that it looked like he was going to pass. Cam clearly starts running and looking for the pass. After the play he looked pretty disappointed that he didn't get it. Probably would have walked it in if CMC had thrown. 

image.png.86b87437ffc9583486e2ddf53940ad8a.png

image.png.e3c234624491364cdcf1444a01218ec1.png

image.png.8e0370d5a652ef623f88c8c9fee7056d.png

image.png.d1cdbe05e2f9e45086df8e4e82d4670b.png

image.png.923aa9b76df195b4e2dee488386a81e9.png

[Don't quote this]

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd like to see the All-22 if anyone has it. Cam's body language suggested to me that he wanted that ball. If you watch how Cam stops, then starts to run again, it sure looks to me as though he's running a route. 2:39 if it doesn't start there automatically. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, AceBoogie said:

The design of this play was to get it on film so the next time they run it, it will be a throw back to Cam.

I would think just the opposite. Now that it's on film, teams will commit to covering Cam and that's one less guy who can tackle McCaffrey. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, dldove77 said:

I'd like to see the All-22 if anyone has it. Cam's body language suggested to me that he wanted that ball. If you watch how Cam stops, then starts to run again, it sure looks to me as though he's running a route. 2:39 if it doesn't start there automatically. 

 

At 40 seconds, why wasn't that a horse collar?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
    • Most elite WRs aren't necessarily burners. Not a lot of elite WRs in the modern era were 4.3 guys. If anything, sometimes it seems like the super fast guys use their speed as a crutch and it hampers their development in the intricacies of route running.
×
×
  • Create New...