Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Draftwire 4 Round Mock

DaveThePanther2008

By DaveThePanther2008,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

DaveThePanther2008 Grand Master

DaveThePanther2008

Posted
Posted

I wasn't overly impressed by this mock draft.  Our first rounder in this one is a replacement for KB.  We don't need another big WR.  If we are going WR in round one we need speed.  Funchess is a #2 and does better when he isn't the focus of defenses.

Round 1. Courtland Sutton WR LSU

Round 2. Tyrell Crosby OT Oregon (thoughts)

Round 3. (From Buffalo) Duke Ejiofor Edge Wake Forrest (thoughts)

Round 3. Donte Jackson CB LSU

Round 4. Traded to Cleveland

I did notice that Nick Chubb RB from Georgia would go to Cleveland in round two after our pick.   This would be a nice pickup if he were available in round 2.

http://draftwire.usatoday.com/2018/01/03/2018-nfl-mock-draft-updated-4-round-projections-heading-into-playoffs/

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JARROD Contributor

JARROD

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, Eazy-E said:

Still can't believe Dave traded a 4th for a fuging punter 

The gift that keeps on taking like Hurney.

If he would have left after 2015 we would all cry,...

but after the garbage he left us,...... thanks Dave for 2016 and thanks even more for setting us up for this season which will go down like chewing bubble gum with the rapper on,...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rags Mentor

Rags

Posted
Posted
48 minutes ago, rodeo said:

i don't watch college football but i looked up Harris Highlights on youtube and this is my mock, please rate it:

1. James Washington - WR, OSU

2. Hayden Hurst - TE, SC

3. TJ Edwards - LB, UW

4. Marcell Frazier - DE, MU

James Washington in the first is a terrible pick

LB in the Third would be the most luxury or luxury picks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rags Mentor

Rags

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

 Our first rounder in this one is a replacement for KB.  We don't need another big WR. 

Sutton isn't KB. Or Funch. 

Sutton actually has some agility and plays up to his size constantly. His feet and hips are way more loose and fluid than most big body wide receivers and that expands his route tree a lot more than Kelvin's, which would, in a world where our OC could actually make good route trees, would be a different beast with Sutton and Funchess than Kelvin and Funchess.

Sutton is also...I wouldn't say speedier but quicker than Kelvin and can do a lot more after the catch. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nails Newbie

Nails

Posted
Posted
34 minutes ago, Rags said:

Drafting for need gets your McClain and Fua

 

And Worley.

Only Tyreek Hill would have CLEARLY been a better football asset for this football team taken after Worley, and obviously we weren’t taking a guy that beat and strangled his pregnant girlfriend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rodeo Veteran

rodeo

Posted
Posted
53 minutes ago, Rags said:

James Washington in the first is a terrible pick

LB in the Third would be the most luxury or luxury picks. 

Washington looked good in the highlights but he didn't look that fast, so you're probably right there, kinda like exchanging KB for shorter KB.

And I think and LB is necessary because we very much need an heir for Davis. We'll need one within a season or two and the dude I found looked like he had fantastic coverage skills.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PootieNunu
      Hey You, You Don't Know Quarterbacking

      By PootieNunu · Posted

      It's funny how the teams with the great QBs stay at or near the top of the league every season.  Yes it is a team game, but the QB has the biggest impact in most NFL football games. 
    • d-dave
      The Bryce Young "Game Winning Drive" narrative needs to end

      By d-dave · Posted

      Look, no one is ever a perfect player.  Since the QB handles the ball on 100% of plays offensively (unless there's a direct snap to a RB or something), I can absolutely see where they get an outsized blame and gain from what happens at any given snap of a football game.   Theoretically, there shouldn't even be a stat or idea to a 4th quarter comeback or game winning drive because you should already have done that during the game.  Losers!  Right?  Just because you win late doesn't take away the fact you tried to lose the game for your team! I'm not a fan of that opinion, but again, I'm just a moron with a keyboard.   Bryce has limited tools.  Bryce has not inspired the same level of confidence in us as Cam Newton did in year 3.  I certainly get that.  We traded a TON of assets to get Bryce, and we still suck.  (I mean, since we've lost games, we're losers right?) I completely understand that some fans are just unhappy with a limited QB and a team that isn't performing well, unless the other teams are worse losers than we are. I will say this:  Bryce will fight until the end.  Sure, he's has some real loser football.   But in close games, he's doing his best to comeback (even against a winner of prevent D). Now is it better or worse if your QB plays their best ball in the first half and sucks 2nd half so long as they finish with 300 yards, 3 TDs for your fantasy points? Who said stats are for winners anyway?  The Panthers and Bryce has a long way to go.  I'm enjoying the winning right now.  Though I do start each game thinking "how will we fug this up today?" Because it's been such a poo show in the Tepper era.  Will he prove to be a legit starting NFL QB?  Maybe not here as evidence by our record with QBs who were high draft picks.  
    • KillerKat
      The Bryce Young "Game Winning Drive" narrative needs to end

      By KillerKat · Posted

      Ive never liked the term game winning drives because they include games where the QB was part of or was the reason the team was behind in the first place. Ive been arguing against this stat since the Delhomme years. It should only count when the QB is out of the equation of reasons why the team fell behind in the first place and is at least half the reason why he led the last drive to give them a lead. It shouldnt count if they just hand it off most of the time and the RB is on fire and they go down and score a TD or FG.
×
×
  • Create New...