Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Draftwire 4 Round Mock


Recommended Posts

I wasn't overly impressed by this mock draft.  Our first rounder in this one is a replacement for KB.  We don't need another big WR.  If we are going WR in round one we need speed.  Funchess is a #2 and does better when he isn't the focus of defenses.

Round 1. Courtland Sutton WR LSU

Round 2. Tyrell Crosby OT Oregon (thoughts)

Round 3. (From Buffalo) Duke Ejiofor Edge Wake Forrest (thoughts)

Round 3. Donte Jackson CB LSU

Round 4. Traded to Cleveland

I did notice that Nick Chubb RB from Georgia would go to Cleveland in round two after our pick.   This would be a nice pickup if he were available in round 2.

http://draftwire.usatoday.com/2018/01/03/2018-nfl-mock-draft-updated-4-round-projections-heading-into-playoffs/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Eazy-E said:

Still can't believe Dave traded a 4th for a fuging punter 

The gift that keeps on taking like Hurney.

If he would have left after 2015 we would all cry,...

but after the garbage he left us,...... thanks Dave for 2016 and thanks even more for setting us up for this season which will go down like chewing bubble gum with the rapper on,...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, rodeo said:

i don't watch college football but i looked up Harris Highlights on youtube and this is my mock, please rate it:

1. James Washington - WR, OSU

2. Hayden Hurst - TE, SC

3. TJ Edwards - LB, UW

4. Marcell Frazier - DE, MU

James Washington in the first is a terrible pick

LB in the Third would be the most luxury or luxury picks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

 Our first rounder in this one is a replacement for KB.  We don't need another big WR. 

Sutton isn't KB. Or Funch. 

Sutton actually has some agility and plays up to his size constantly. His feet and hips are way more loose and fluid than most big body wide receivers and that expands his route tree a lot more than Kelvin's, which would, in a world where our OC could actually make good route trees, would be a different beast with Sutton and Funchess than Kelvin and Funchess.

Sutton is also...I wouldn't say speedier but quicker than Kelvin and can do a lot more after the catch. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Rags said:

Drafting for need gets your McClain and Fua

 

And Worley.

Only Tyreek Hill would have CLEARLY been a better football asset for this football team taken after Worley, and obviously we weren’t taking a guy that beat and strangled his pregnant girlfriend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Rags said:

James Washington in the first is a terrible pick

LB in the Third would be the most luxury or luxury picks. 

Washington looked good in the highlights but he didn't look that fast, so you're probably right there, kinda like exchanging KB for shorter KB.

And I think and LB is necessary because we very much need an heir for Davis. We'll need one within a season or two and the dude I found looked like he had fantastic coverage skills.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...