Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jeremy Hill - Potential Buy Low RB Option for Norv


Soul Rebel

Recommended Posts

14 hours ago, stbugs said:

1st pick for Gordon? This place sometimes. That is lunacy. He had a 42.9% catch rate last year. He's going to be 27 in a couple months and is one strike away from being done.

I'm not saying I would do it (but not saying I wouldn't)...But this draft is probably not going to be great for WRs,  and it's so deep at other positions, in that there's not a helluva lot to distinguish a first from a second (or maybe even a third) as far as talent and/or potential, so this would be the draft to do it if you wanted to do it. 

It all depends on your player evaluations and draft grades.  I mean if it holds true that you can get first round talent relative to this year's class in the second or third round,  then you could consider the risk.  From what I've gathered,  this class will be particularly deep at QB,  RB,  and DB.  If there's no DE or OT (LT)  worth drafting at 24, then you might consider getting on the phone.  

All I am saying is keep your options open and go with the flow.  Of course free agency will be a determining factor as well.  

As for catch rates,  that's not the best stat to justify negatively judging a receiver because of too many variables,  beginning with suspect QB play (particularly from an inexperienced and inaccurate rookie).  Moreover,  27 is nothing for a receiver.  He'll likely be in his prime for several years. 

@stbugs, likewise risk factor ain't really got poo to do with being a top three talent.  Making light of an amazing season is kinda crazy.  Gordon was amazing that season,  more amazing than most. Just think if he had had his head on straight all those years.  There's no telling how many yards he would have amassed.  And that was with an arguably third string QB. 

edit: damned rushing and auto-correct getting me today. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, stbugs said:

Lol. Somebody had Gordon his one good year in fantasy. He’s nowhere near top 3, period, especially with his risk factor. Top 3 isn’t a catch rate of under 43%. 

Deshone fugging Kizer is his QB lol.

I’m mostly joking about trading for him but he’s still an elite WR, don’t kid yourself

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, stbugs said:

Lol. Somebody had Gordon his one good year in fantasy. He’s nowhere near top 3, period, especially with his risk factor. Top 3 isn’t a catch rate of under 43%. 

Man I fugging wish I had him. Check the % of his targets that were catchable. Kizer was all over he place this year and hue Jackson can’t coach. Reunite turner and gordon 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/23/2018 at 4:07 PM, stbugs said:

Not a bad thought. Ingram got very little bite wise before resigning with NO. Hill isn’t going to command much, but could be a nice deal. He might be more interested for a little less to come here and prove it. Turner being here might make a RB more inclined to join us a bit cheaper.

I love CMC and I think he’ll continue to do better, but Stewart was so bad this year outside of a couple games. CMC improves his ypc to 4.7 in the second half once the OL started run blocking but Stewart didn’t really. 5 of his 8 second half games were 3.09 ypc or under (2 under 2 ypc). Outside of the one run for 60 against Minnesota which was all blocking (gigantic hole), his best game was Miami with over 6 ypc. Only problem was that was actually under our team ypc average of over 8 ypc. 

Yea 3 ypc doesn’t cut it in the NFL anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He’s kind of overrated to be honest. Never really felt like a true #1 or elevated his play to become a guy the defense really has to worry about. 
    • I'm going to be real, the reason that vote ended up so lop-sided by the end was directly due to my programming. So there's nothing tongue in cheek about it. Also I left PFF after the Collinsworth acquisition (didn't want to move to Cincy) but have stayed involved in analytics via backdoor channels, but I can absolutely say that the experience was eye-opening, not because those guys are unquestionable football savants and that I became one by proxy, but because the amount of information that becomes available outside of what the typical fan has access to is revelatory and also really drives home how much context is still being missed even with all of that information. You don't discover that you know everything, you discover how much you still can't know no matter how hard you try, hence my point about the NFL not being able to figure out what makes a QB good. There's a lot of AI work going into that now and even that only seems to further confuse things vs. actually enlighten the problem. In the professional realm teams don't really talk about quarterbacks as A strictly being better than B, but how A can potentially perform better than B given a specific context of C. Of course those contexts may be wider for A than B, but there's also contexts where B can outshine A, even with lesser talent surrounding them. So what good teams strive to do is ultimately define a process of how they want their entire team to operate under schematically, find players that fit that scheme, and hopefully find a guy whose skillset will be maximized running that scheme with those players. Where bad teams fall of the wagon is constantly shifting those schemes and chasing bad fits or fads vs. sticking with a core identity and developing it.
    • there is a 100 mile long list of NFL players and coaches going to bat and defending horrible play from teammates.   
×
×
  • Create New...