Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dibs on first offseason uniform thread this year


Ricky Spanish

Recommended Posts

So someone on reddit is doing a series on team uniforms. Yesterday they did 'the awful' and the Bucs were dead last. 

Today they did 'the bad' and unfortunately we made the list. While I don't necessarily 100% agree, I will say that this person makes some really good points:

Quote

I know I'm going to get a lot of hate from Panther fans on this one, but hear me out. The Panthers have a great logo and fantastic colors, but uniforms that are filled with design issues that don't take adantage of those things.

The biggest issue to me is the amount of Panther head logos used throughout the design. They have an oversized logo on the helmet, the exact same logo on the sleeves, and then again on the pants. If you're a team like the Eagles or Rams you can have your full team logo on your sleeves because you're using a different design on your helmet. With the Panthers it's extremely redundant.

There are some teams that still use the old Reebok template, but have updated their fabrics to Nike. The Panthers are one of only a couple teams that still use the Reebok template and even older fabrics. So you're presented with this super shiny, 90's basketball shorts style fabric for the Carolina blue that doesn't hold its shape when it's on the players. This means the shoulder stripes and pant stripes wildly change in thickness. It's not a good look.

The block numbers don't match any other part of the rounded design. It's something that is cool on an old school team, but not a team that came into the league in 1995. The center stripes on their helmet might have also been cool back in the 90's, but now they look weird and completely unnecessary with such a big helmet logo.

I commend the Panthers for sticking with basically the same look for as long as they have, but they would benefit greatly from a template change to provide some structure and removing redundant logos.

Fair points all around. 

Anyway, talk amongst yourselves. I certainly don't want to talk about how Hurney will be GM for life any longer, it's too depressing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've always thought the head logo complaint was fair but the others are stupid.

 

Loading up on Nike pro combat garbage that is going to look laughably dated in 10 years isn't the right approach for anybody, much less a team that is trying to build its own legacy as a respectable,long tenured organization.

 

I genuinely think our uniforms are some of the cleanest in the league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Growl said:

I've always thought the head logo complaint was fair but the others are stupid.

 

Loading up on Nike pro combat garbage that is going to look laughably dated in 10 years isn't the right approach for anybody, much less a team that is trying to build its own legacy as a respectable,long tenured organization.

 

I genuinely think our uniforms are some of the cleanest in the league.

I don't think we necessarily need to do too much, just a small tweak here and there. Get rid of the panther that shows up everywhere, fix the stripe so it's more consistent across all bodies, and maybe fix the stripes on the helmet/pants.

Also make the helmets black. That's a must. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

REFERRING TO THE AWFUL UNIS:

Call me crazy, but I like the Rams white horns on blue helmet with the white unis.   They are going to break TOTALLY away from the St; Louis Rams gold in 2019.

image.png.03f7cdd6a9c3060a3eb9bdbe79930d9f.png

By the way, the Steelers and Packers should not wear the throwbacks.

The Patriots should go back to their red UCLA jerseys with the image.png.325986edd6e078e900d7931e2dfc46bd.png helmet.

The one they wear now looks like our helmet and I hate Brady. 

In addition, Jax is getting rid of the two-tone helmet that looks as if they were torched in a kiln accident.

image.png.e45826174db8f63efa2bd91dd7b6f8e0.png

I think they are going to an all-gold helmet next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...