Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Postions most often drafted between picks 20-28


panther4life

Recommended Posts

Was killing some time over at http://www.nfl.com/draft/history/fulldraft?season=2011&round=round1#round1

and was able to compile this list of players taken between picks 20-28 with our pick being the median (pick 24).

I used every draft since the new CBA (2011-2017)

This = 63 players total. Here is the breakdown of positions taken in that range, in order of most to least.

  1. DE (10), CB (10), WR(10)
  2. LB (7)
  3. TACKLE (6), Guard (6)
  4. QB (4), DT (4)
  5. SAFETY (3)
  6. TE (2)
  7. RB (1)

PICK 24 ONLY

Corners led the way with 3, Tackle's,LB,DE, AND Guard each had one taken.

Hurney himself has picked within that same criteria 3 times and netted the following.

  • Gamble at 28 in 04
  • Deangelo Williams at 26 in 06
  • Beason at 27 in 07

* We would have picked 29th in 09 but traded that pick to move up and get Otah at 19 the prior year.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First off, this was some quality data mining @panther4life. Really usable information there!

At picks 20-28 it's often not about what your need is, but about grabbing the best of the remaining players and the spread of positions taken really seems to reflect that.

Then, looking at Hurney's picks during that frame in the draft, he's done excellent. Each of those guys were league leaders in their day. In truth, his run of 1st Round picks has been exemplary, with only Otah standing out as a bust (and that was due to injury -- something no one can predict).

While the final say in the pick is officially Hurney's, a lot of weight goes to the opinions of the scouting department. The question I have is do we have as good a set of scouts as we used to have or did we have a lot of turnover there during Gettleman's tenure? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Over previous years? Sure is 😆
    • An odd little vibe I've noticed here of late: some folks are "all or nothing" to an absolutely extreme level when it comes to Bryce. Here's a bit of truth telling though: There are, in fact, things Bryce does well. Likewise, there are areas in which he's improved over his time here. He has, on several occasions now, legitimately helped us win games. On the flipside, there have been failures in other areas as well as coaching that we're not in any way his fault.  And finally , it is also genuinely possible that the team may see him as the future, even if we don't. The craziest part, though? It's actually possible that they're right and we're wrong. All of this is true, and more, yet if you accept any of these premises people go from zero to apesh-t in under three seconds 😳 Anything less than total disavowal of Bryce and / or agreement that he's the worst QB of all time and suddenly you're a "stan". Oy 🙄 The reality though?  Bryce is indeed an NFL quarterback. Not a great one, probably backup level good, and I've seen way worse. Now, if you run that statement through your personal Google translator and it comes back with some version of "I want to throw 50 million a year at Bryce for the next 10 years", that's not really my issue it's yours  I don't wanna make him the franchise quarterback, but it's not my call. Win or lose, the team is going to do what they think is best. And as always, if it disagrees with what I think we should do, I'm gonna hope I'm the one who's wrong. Internet clout means nothing. Watching my favorite team win at my favorite sport meas fun 😁
×
×
  • Create New...