Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Breaking down Cockrell as a Zone CB


MHS831

Recommended Posts

    IMO, the Cockrell signing gives us 2 solid #2CBs. Both still young enough to have time to improve. Could we use a #1? Probably. Can we go to war with these 2? Absolutely.

 

   Top of my list is the best FS we can get. Get that kid, and we have a shot at a really good Defense. 

 

    With the next 2 picks I would take the combination of TE, and CB. I say combination, because I can't make up my mind which way the value works out to our best advantage. I think we need talent at TE a bit more than at CB. But a 2nd round CB could make a run at Bradberry and Cockrell. Decisions, decisions. 

 

    That last 3rd goes toward the best RB left. With this class, there is a real good chance we can still get a kid that can produce right out of the gate. 

 

    As is, I believe we can be competitive. If the draft falls right? We can be a dangerous team. Especially if Norv, and Cam hit it off. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Panfan35 said:

 I think adding a top-tier running back is more important then a tight in at this moment and so combination of running back and corner is more Likely

 

    This class is chock full of talented RBs. No need to go after one too early. 

 

    But then again, it does come down to how you rank your needs. And how you plan to address them. 

 

    Ideally, I would take the best TE available at #24. But as we really need to solidify that FS position. I would much rather use that 1st and get one of the best FS in the draft. 

 

    Then use the next two picks on TE, and CB. Where there is still good talent available. RB can hopefully wait until that 2nd 3rd. 

 

    That's just how it is. If you don't see it that way. Well... I just don't know what to tell ya. lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

Ideally, I would take the best TE available at #24. But as we really need to solidify that FS position. I would much rather use that 1st and get one of the best FS in the draft. 

At that point I'm not so sure there will be a safety on the board worth a 1st, so hopefully Hurndawg has OG/DE/TE/CB also queued up and ready to go.  If the Hernandez kid, OG from UTEP, is still waiting there at 24, do not pass GO, do not collect $200, just turn in the damn name.  Hell, if Hernandez is gone, I'd go with the OG/OT/C from Georgia, Wynn, almost over any other position if he is still there.  Hernandez is likely the most dominating OG in the draft.  Wynn is true 1st round value that can play any position on your OL and could play OG for you this year and next hear slide to the middle to replace Kalil.  And, since he's also played OT a lot in college he can back-up those positions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

    IMO, the Cockrell signing gives us 2 solid #2CBs. Both still young enough to have time to improve. Could we use a #1? Probably. Can we go to war with these 2? Absolutely.

 

   Top of my list is the best FS we can get. Get that kid, and we have a shot at a really good Defense. 

 

    With the next 2 picks I would take the combination of TE, and CB. I say combination, because I can't make up my mind which way the value works out to our best advantage. I think we need talent at TE a bit more than at CB. But a 2nd round CB could make a run at Bradberry and Cockrell. Decisions, decisions. 

 

    That last 3rd goes toward the best RB left. With this class, there is a real good chance we can still get a kid that can produce right out of the gate. 

 

    As is, I believe we can be competitive. If the draft falls right? We can be a dangerous team. Especially if Norv, and Cam hit it off. 

I am OK with the CB tandem right now--but I would add one late (deep draft) to compete with Seymour.  I think Cockrell eliminated a need in the draft.  I was curious about your feelings about LG--not mentioned.

1. Justin Reid FS, Stanford.  I think we are in a position to trade back about 5 spots and still take Reid. I am assuming we would get a fourth to do so, so I am adding a 4th rounder below.

2. TE Mike Gesicki, Penn St.  Look at his production and combine numbers. 

3.  OL Tyrell Crosby, Oregon.  He was excellent at Oregon, allowing no sacks and no hits in 2017. Very athletic.  Only 6-4, so he could play tackle, guard, and might make a better Center.  In other words, he can play all positions on the line of scrimmage.  I would move Moton to LG and develop Crosby as depth while working him as a center for 2019.  And if Moton is not an option at LG, Crosby would be nice there. 

3. RB Kalen Ballage Arizona St.  6-2, 230 and runs a 4.46.  I suspect he can tote the rock between the tackles. 

4. (trade) Brandon Parker, OT NC A&T Needs a year to develop, but he has long arms, good footwork.  Impressed at Senior Bowl.  High character kid from good family (I know his dad very well). Local scouts predict he will start in the NFL.

5. Siran Neal, SS Jacksonville State.  A college CB that loves to tackle--projects to a S in the bigs.  Imagine a SS with some cover skills.  (Torn between Neal and Marcus Allen here, fwiw).

6. Isaac Yiadom, CB.  Big and ran good time at combine.  Had  a good senior season.

7s.  BPA

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

2. TE Mike Gesicki, Penn St.  Look at his production and combine numbers.

  I'm not excited by the combine but each to their own. I enjoy the senior bowl more- last year Hunt and Kamara excelled there and were promptly ignored. Gesicki was completely anonymous there while Goedart looked impressive and Gesicki's performance strikes me as a red flag. I have Gesicki pegged as a mirage. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mc52beast said:

We can definitely “go to war” with the corners we have now... the question is can we be competitive in the South enough to win it? I’m saying no, so drafting a corner is important. 

 

 

    We have two solid CBs. Can you say the same about that S position? So even though we may still need to take a chance on a CB, we defiantly need to look at the S position.

 

    Do you trust Cap? If not, we need to also look at RB. Throw in TE as well.

 

    That is four positions. And we have 4 of the top 100 picks. I am just glad I don't have to figure out how to go about getting this done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Seoul_Panther said:

  I'm not excited by the combine but each to their own. I enjoy the senior bowl more- last year Hunt and Kamara excelled there and were promptly ignored. Gesicki was completely anonymous there while Goedart looked impressive and Gesicki's performance strikes me as a red flag. I have Gesicki pegged as a mirage. 

The production at Penn St was there.  Not sure the Senior bowl provides enough chemistry between QB and TE/WR to judge either, but I see your point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

    We have two solid CBs. Can you say the same about that S position? So even though we may still need to take a chance on a CB, we defiantly need to look at the S position.

 

    Do you trust Cap? If not, we need to also look at RB. Throw in TE as well.

 

    That is four positions. And we have 4 of the top 100 picks. I am just glad I don't have to figure out how to go about getting this done.

I think we are looking for both a FS and SS--Searcy and Adams are not exactly cornerstones.  CB?  We are better.  Bradberry disappointed last year, but we should be in a better situation last year.  When you blitz nearly every down, you put zone CBs at a disadvantage.  Bradberry was usually locked on the #1 WR.  Tough sledding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, tiger7_88 said:

At that point I'm not so sure there will be a safety on the board worth a 1st, so hopefully Hurndawg has OG/DE/TE/CB also queued up and ready to go.  If the Hernandez kid, OG from UTEP, is still waiting there at 24, do not pass GO, do not collect $200, just turn in the damn name.  Hell, if Hernandez is gone, I'd go with the OG/OT/C from Georgia, Wynn, almost over any other position if he is still there.  Hernandez is likely the most dominating OG in the draft.  Wynn is true 1st round value that can play any position on your OL and could play OG for you this year and next hear slide to the middle to replace Kalil.  And, since he's also played OT a lot in college he can back-up those positions.

 

    I'm sorry. But this is not the year to throw high draft picks at the lines. You can get quality G play almost anywhere in the draft. Plus we have other options as well. 

 

    We need skill position players, especially at DB. You can probably throw in TE, and RB. When you need athletes as badly as we do. You have to get them higher in the draft.

 

    Now, if Hurndog happens to bring in a FS that can solidify our backfield. Then you can have your guard. Otherwise, you are going to have to get him later in the draft. 

 

    In most years, I would be with you. This just happens to be one of those years that bucks the trend.

 

    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do we have a rating on how many of those running backs can also pass block and pick up blitz?

stewarts true value was that. Norvs offense traditionally with those downfield throws require someone to block effectively.

thats who we are looking at, narrow those down.

so I agree with the tightend FS, but a draft full of running back prospects has how many that can block like Stewart did?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...