Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Players can now be ejected by officials in New York


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Interesting development, though it seems like it's not exactly what they needed.

I could see them allowing remote officials to eject players for acts that the on field refs may not have been in position to see, but it seems odd to allow them to simply increase the severity of a foul already flagged with an ejection.

Have to see how it plays out I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This will make all those long ass reviews even more gut wrenching.  If they already take forever to decide if a foot was in or out you may as well go wash your car while they decide whether to make a decision like throwing a player out of the game. And you can bet the symbol on the helmet or name on the jersey will absolutely come into play in the decision. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, tondi said:

This will make all those long ass reviews even more gut wrenching.  If they already take forever to decide if a foot was in or out you may as well go wash your car while they decide whether to make a decision like throwing a player out of the game. And you can bet the symbol on the helmet or name on the jersey will absolutely come into play in the decision. 

There is no need to suspend play while those types of decisions are made.  None at all.  If it takes a play or two for officials at a remote location to look at the angles and see that a player deserves to be ejected, fine.  It's better than a player staying in.  Look no further than OBJ's hit on JNo.  SOB should have been GONE.  If this move corrects situations like that, sign me up.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The first game that comes to mind is the 09 NFC championship game when Minnesota lost to New Orleans.  Had the refs done their job and seen what Greg Williams was doing, the Saints would still be without a Super Bowl. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The only thing I said was he was part of the staff that made part of the decisions, and that I am judging the decisions made by that group as a whole. As assistant GM, you can pretty much guarantee his input held more sway than an intern or the guy that takes coffee requests. Fitterer didn't operate in a vacuum. Neither does Morgan now. While Fitterer did have the ultimate decision, to say that Dan had no input in ranking boards, evaluating FAs, trade offers or anything else would be asinine. We all know he did. Otherwise what the hell was his job as assistant GM? He wouldn't have been kept for 3 years if he was arguing every decision Scott ever made.    And the actual quote was "Morgan has done a bang up job in the draft and FA. Compared to what the last guy did, he is kicking ass and taking names." So is XL kicking ass and Brooks taking names from last years draft or did I get it backwards? We took Wallace over Payton Wilson because he was an injury risk after trading up for a RB with a torn ACL? Which one of the kicking ass and taking names was that?  Maybe we should review the thousands of gameday posts calling for XL to get off the field because he's a bust and can't catch a cold. We could review the posts about Brooks but... And Wilson. He's at 118 tackles this season vs 36 for Wallace.  I gave credit to Dan for a good draft this year. But I'm also not ignoring last year's draft either since he did that one after the last guy too.  That's not a strawman. 
    • And then, in week 18, we can take Mayfield out of the game and whoop Bridgewater's @$$ for good measure! Let the former QB revenge train roll on!!
    • If we keep our guards in tact ($$$) and go with Mays at C, some OT depth would be nice. I think we should be happy about CB with Thornton's development (pre injury) and Smith Wade. I think Ransom is developing nicely, but I would like to see a FS type for situations. We suck at ILB and Edge (as a whole). We should be OK at RB.  I hope we sign Dowdle to a short contract. QB?  There are signs of hope and development.  (I don't like our backup QB) TE?  Good draft for TE, but I think we are developing with Evans, Sanders, and Tremble. WR?  A #2 with Coker and Horn in the slot.  XL?  What is that? We should be good in 2026. Morgan does more than draft.  Free agency has been strong too.  (Just emptying my brain on your comment--sorry)
×
×
  • Create New...