Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

RR: Cockrell to push Bradberry for #1 CB


MHS831

Recommended Posts

Only reason I can think of for the decline of Bradberry was Wilks' move to DC. Now he's gone. Bradberry was almost as bad as Worley last season. He looked lost on almost every play and QBs were not afraid to throw his way. I hope we continue lighting a fire under the picks DG made. He made a lot of terrible picks and we need to fix his mistakes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, MHS831 said:

This sounds as if we are OK going into the season with Bradberry, Cockrell, and Seymour, but a drafted CB is probably in the mix.  Interesting comments about competition--sounds like they got rid of Worley because he would not push Bradberry.

Thoughts that went through MHS' brain while reading this:

  • No mention of Gunter.
  • Boy, Worley would hate this. 
  • Does this also bash Bradberry?
  • It is interesting that 65% of respondents to the survey are OK with the CB situation.
  • I wonder who invented jelly?

https://www.derp/2018/4/7/17210252/nfl-carolina-panthers-ross-cockrell-james-bradberry-ron-rivera-no-1-cornerback-competition

 

 

Gunter re-signed after the interview with RR but before this article was published. Take it for what it is but that's why there was no mention of him at that time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Soul Rebel said:

Is it just me or is there overreaction to Bradberry's 2017 play?

He turned in a pretty amazing rookie year and had a sophomore slump. He's still a really good corner, IMO and until I see another season like I did in 2017, I believe he is a potential CB1. I think our defense as a whole got exposed more last year than I can remember. Coleman was downright awful last year, Worley was Jekyll and Hyde and even guys like Luke and Shaq had moments of lapse. I think Wilks was to blame for a lot of it too. 

I think Cockrell will push Bradberry and we will have two solid starting corners....something we have not had for awhile. It's kinda like our WR position.... we don't have a true WR1, but Funch is pretty close to it and as a whole our unit is solid. 

Not just you, and it was not a real sophomore slump...We blitzed way too much.  40% of the time in 2017 vs. 25% in 2016.  I am confident that we helped Worley more and left Bradberry on an island.  OK, let's say there are 30 passes in a game.  That means 12 passes were thrown during a blitz, when the CB was in man coverage.

In 2016, the QB throws 30 passes, but only 7.5 of the passes were during blitzes.  Let's say that of the 12 passes thrown in 2016, the QB completes 60% of those--about 7 passes.  In 2017, 60% of 7.5 is about 4.5.  The difference is 2.5 passes when completed have big play potential.   Who makes the big plays?  The #1 WR in most cases.  So,, if the difference is 3 passes a game that are most likely to break a big play, it is reasonable to suggest that blitzing may have cost us about more 50 yards per game than in 2016.

And let's look at the Panther reaction to this issue in the off season.  They let Coleman go (in his prime) and they  trade Worley.  That (to me) suggests that Bradberry was asked to do too much for a Zone CB and they put him in a bad situation.  Bradberry was the lone sheriff when the town was raided by the bad guys. 

Someone said, "He gave up a lot underneath." He sure did.  That is where a good WR (the #1) goes when he sees a blitz.  Bradberry had deep third or deep half responsibility because Adams was old and limited and Coleman was leaning toward Worley (an example-could be the other way around at times).  Bradberry was playing zone CB, and he knows what routes the offense runs out of certain formations.  Blitzing causes the WR and the QB to get on the same page and improvise.  Not what Bradberry does.

Finally, take a look at the QBs he faced after week 2:  Brees, Brees, Ryan, Ryan, Winston, Winston, Brady, Rogers, Stafford, Wentz,  and a few hot-handed veterans Keenum and McCown.

So Bradberry needs someone to take #1 from him.  He would be a much better #2 than Worley.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, thomas96 said:

If we can get anything out of a rookie DE, Hall, Obada or Cox and Pep, Addison and Horton can replicate or build upon last year and if Poe is as advertised as an interior pass rusher (the aspect of his game that Star didn't have) then I honestly think we'll be in great shape defensively regardless of who is at CB. Cockrell is a really solid signing and I think could have a Kurt Coleman like impact but at corner. I hope we get an instant starter at S in the first 3 rounds too but I really think if we can get a pass rush that resembles 2013 then our secondary should be just fine with what we've got back there. Need Shaq to take that step forward into TD's 2013 role though. The 4 game suspension should allow him to take a stranglehold on that role and when TD comes back he can become a rotational guy like Blackburn was then. If CB is BPA early then great go for it and keep stacking the defense but if it doesn't turn out that way I still feel good about the group we have.

I don't understand why we get so worked up about DBs--this team wins and loses based on the front 7.  Always have.   The big question mark is DE.  I am fine with Bradberry, Cockrell, Adams and Searcy at this point because the draft will probably strengthen these spots.  I do not see any help at DE beyond the roster.

Obada could be the hidden gem.  Wouldn't that be fun?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

I don't understand why we get so worked up about DBs--this team wins and loses based on the front 7.  Always have.   The big question mark is DE.  I am fine with Bradberry, Cockrell, Adams and Searcy at this point because the draft will probably strengthen these spots.  I do not see any help at DE beyond the roster.

Obada could be the hidden gem.  Wouldn't that be fun?

We gotta be able to cover better than we did last year. We were 3rd in the NFL in sacks and our secondary still got picked apart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds like Worley was just a scrub after all.  Think about how much Bradberry was struggling at one point.  The number 2 guy couldn't even challenge for snaps as the lead cover man, because he was too busy riding the pine for his own spot.  Add in his comments in the press, all those PIs and getting out run down field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, MHS831 said:

I don't understand why we get so worked up about DBs--this team wins and loses based on the front 7.  Always have.   The big question mark is DE.  I am fine with Bradberry, Cockrell, Adams and Searcy at this point because the draft will probably strengthen these spots.  I do not see any help at DE beyond the roster.

Obada could be the hidden gem.  Wouldn't that be fun?

It's not a coincidence that we had our best year with our best dbs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, MtnProwler said:

Gunter re-signed after the interview with RR but before this article was published. Take it for what it is but that's why there was no mention of him at that time.

Makes sense. Good point.  I personally like Gunter as depth and on special teams--he is young and can evolve into a good player (see Norman, Josh).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

We gotta be able to cover better than we did last year. We were 3rd in the NFL in sacks and our secondary still got picked apart.

No doubt.  When we blitz, I think of it like in hockey when you pull your goalie to get an extra man advantage on one side of the field.  Eventually, you get burned and it is not a good idea to do a lot.  We blitzed too much, and with poor safety play for much of the season, it bit us.  Once the QB has seen your blitzes, he learns the giveaways.  I love listening to Romo call a football game because he sees it and points it out.  So if we show these looks to the QB 40% of the game, it puts a lot of pressure on the DBs if the blitz is picked up.  I know you know this, but Bradberry is a Zone CB who had to play man a lot.  Norman went from 2016 in Carolina (25% blitzes) to Washington where they blitzed more and his numbers fell. 

Covering better (and I agree) requires help in front (pressure) and help over the top.  We were third in sacks but only Cleveland blitzed more than us...when they didn't get there, we were outnumbered and outclassed.  We played some smart QBs last year (Brady Rogers Brees x 2, Ryan  x 2, Stafford, Cutler,  etc. 

I think Bradberry needs to compete and it would not surprise me to see him as the #3 outside CB by the end of camp. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...