Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tidbit from the New York Times cheerleader story


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, t96 said:

What’s the problem?

Let me stop you because I think I've heard this before:

"Everyone involved did everything by their own choice. This was free economic activity among consenting adults. No one was forced at gunpoint to do any of these. All parties involved were entering into economic arrangements with full consent, and it is no one's business to interfere with the workings of the market."

The same glib freshman-level economic analysis that can be used to justify everything from sharecropping to indentured servitude to organ auctions. (And yes, NFL cheerleading is a fair sight better than any of those.) As the kids say, miss me with that.

When you charge $1200 to the client and pay the worker $100, there is a problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, panthers55 said:

The fix is going to be simple just do away with them completely. Saves money and hassle. 

This 100%, as before.

If we don't do that, though, it's time to make them real employees and treat them decently.

No more of this halfway sh*t.

Decide whether or not cheerleaders are worth the while. Pay them fairly if so, disband if not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I were a team owner right now, completely leaving aside any moral or philosophical or political questions, I would probably make the move to drop the c-squad just based on the newfound potential for controversy and "distraction" (football's stupidest but most useful term of art).

Of course, you'll get the usual wailing and gnashing of teeth from the "BY GAWD YOU ARE TURNING THIS INTO FLAG FOOTBALL" crowd. But you always get that. About everything.

As someone who has spent much of a lifetime ignoring and politely deflecting the gibbering of imbecile lucky-sperm-club boosters and booster-wannabes, let me just say that these people usually holler themselves to sleep. Let them cry and then let them nap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I read an article a few days ago that places like Seattle green bay and a few others are revoking tickets rights to holders that sell 100% of their tickets. That would do a lot of good league wide for bringing back some home field advantages. We aren't the only team who's stadiums get over run by visitors. It happens basically everywhere. That would go a long way to bringing ticket costs down 
    • yeah, you can basically copy and paste my thoughts from this time last year.   We are building an O more suited for Jake Delhomme than Bryce Young.  Tmac and XL sound great for the downfield gunslinger  Give them opportunities to make plays.  From what I have seen, and the scouting stuff I have read.....TMac does not project as a get open quick WR.  He is going to have to work on getting off the line at this level, getting open, etc.  Which is all good.  This you go to think people will be studs out the gate or you are hater logic just ain't what I do.   Take my XL stance last year.  I lobbied hard for him.  When we drafted him I immediately told folks to pump their breaks on the wild expectations.    If XL legitimately turned into what I think he can be.....his best setup in the league would not be paired w/ a QB like Young.  if Bryce was going to be the dude, I would have lobbied for Ladd vs XL.  I was an XL guy.   And again, I would have gone Warren/Jeanty this draft.   I would have invested in small ball talent for him to be the PG for. 
    • @TheBigKatare you going to Arizona? I'm thinking about making a road trip again. Haven't venture out since we got spanked in Miami a couple years ago
×
×
  • Create New...