Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jerry Richardson accuser speaks and provides proof


panther4life

Recommended Posts

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

Non...disclosure...agreement.

And I'm pretty sure she didn't negotiate it herself.

NDA is to collect money without speaking about an incident.

 

if she wanted to start a movement of women vs powerful men - it would have been better off making that effort.

 

she had a choice, and she chose NDA. Nothing wrong with her decision, but her motive has to stay consistent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It's the right move. Nothing they could say would help their case. Best to just remain quiet until new ownership is in place and the whole organization gets gutted. 

Kinda wonder how Rodrigue feels about all this given her own little spat with the team a while back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheCasillas said:

NDA is to collect money without speaking about an incident.

if she wanted to start a movement of women vs powerful men - it would have been better off making that effort.

she had a choice, and she chose NDA. Nothing wrong with her decision, but her motive has to stay consistent.

You don't have a daughter, do you?

And she's actually trying to get out of the NDA now.  It's not as simple as giving the money back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It's the right move. Nothing they could say would help their case. Best to just remain quite until new ownership is in place and the whole organization gets gutted. 

That's the problem with our twitter driven society, everyone wants a 150 letter hot takes. Any lawyer would always tell a defendant or person under investigation to keep their fugging mouth shut. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

You don't have a daughter, do you?

And she's actually trying to get out of the NDA now.  It's not as simple as giving the money back.

I understand that you are family man, and that you empathize with the victim. Thats respectable, and I have zero qualms against that. I respect you for that.

My concerns lie with the fact that she brings up standing up for women and African americans in her note, but when had the chance to do so when this originally occurred, she took money and remained quiet. There is not doubt she is a victim, and went through some eery poo. However, when she the moment to stand up and be brave, she didnt. It's as if her motive has changed now. 

 

Due to this action her message will not do anything but get click on a  website, a few forums posts, and maybe a couple lines on ESPN. In two weeks, this is will be nothing. 

The problem is that she is too late to have an impact. She should of gone public, and sued JR when it happened. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Now now now, I wouldn't say there is no logic, but there's just not a lot of in-depth thought put into Barnwell's  "analysis." Now to be fair to him (and other national writers), pre-season team rankings are basically clickbait. And...Barnwell, himself, said that "there's a lot of projection here." He basically admits that he doesn't know how the hell things are going to turn out with our receiver group. He also said that "I find myself" more intrigued by Coker than Legette; that does not mean that he said that fans should be, or that Coker will even be better than Legette (regardless of ESPN's per-route-run stat). So, yeah, Barnwell said some things, but even he has to basically admit that he doesn't know how bad or good that our playmakers will be in 2025.  Overall, what Barnwell is basically thinking is that the Panthers have gotten worse at the offensive skill positions, and baked into that is that others have gotten better. That's the argument in July (meaning, please don't give this any more weight than it's due). I would personally be surprised (not shocked) if we end up worse than the Titans, Pats and Giants at least. Once you throw in the Bills, Giants, Jets, Steelers, and even the Chargers, I personally think there are several teams' skill groups that may end up ranked lower than ours by the end of 2025.  @kungfoodudeis one of my dudes, but like others he is over the tipping point. He's had enough. Seeing is believing. I will say this though: Barnwell's piece is less about logic than just good ol' opinion. And to be honest, he might as well be a Huddler throwing out sh¡t in the summer based upon nothing but good feels or bad feels.  Our offense as a whole (just like any other team's) is going to depend upon the play of the O-line and especially the QB. How you can even rank the skill positions without expressly baking those two things in the cake is beyond me. I would dare say that that's not even logical. 
    • Football is not the professional sport where timidness and apprehension are justly rewarded. 
    • Bryce Young had a super high floor definitely at least won't be a bust safe pick we allegedly had seen in some time.......and went on to have one of the worst rookie seasons of all time.  They are all lotto picks.  And that is especially true for whatever they will be day 1 in the NFL.  I don't think Tmac is a sure thing year 1.  It's not like we watched him do his thing in the SEC.  He was a PAC12 guy.  I'm sure it will take time
×
×
  • Create New...