Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Run and Shoot


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Some folks on here might be too young to know what that term means. 

For those who do, I'm finding that a lot of our current receiver lineup (Moore, Samuel, Smith, Byrd) would have fit pretty well into a run and shoot attack like the Lions, Oilers and Falcons used to run.

Run and shoot was almost like backyard football, less rigid than a lot of offensive systems.  It was different for the QB too, less strict progression and more "find the open guy".

Norv Turner is definitely familiar with this kind of offense, but he's never run it.  I don't expect he would here either, but pondering our personnel we have with the way those old offenses used to run, I kind of wonder if some of those concepts could work with who we have. 

And if you remember, Turner did say in his "summer" feature that offense didn't need to be complicated.  Norv's quote, "just find the open guy and throw it to him" is run and shoot in a nutshell.

To others who remember the old run and shoot offenses - or who get the concepts, anyway - what would you think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would Norv make that big of a switch?  Or are we trying to recreate the important elements of his offense?  I thought Norv was coming to adjust the offense, not make a wholesale change of things.  Better teaching, play calling, and execution were the goals, I thought.

Camp is going to be very interesting, that's for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

I actually think Cam Newton would love the improvisational nature of such an attack.

And heck, he's tall enough to have good downfield vision and find the open guys.

Right...Cam always plays best when we go uptempo and no huddle and play aggressive. We drafted him number 1, he's been mvp, we should play the style and tempo that suits him best in my opinion 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, d-dave said:

Would Norv make that big of a switch?  Or are we trying to recreate the important elements of his offense?  I thought Norv was coming to adjust the offense, not make a wholesale change of things.  Better teaching, play calling, and execution were the goals, I thought.

Camp is going to be very interesting, that's for sure.

Hard to say.  Not his base attack, but with that said Norv has (occasionally) shown willingness to be flexible.  Plus he knows he's never worked with a quarterback quite like Newton.

I wanna say he could work in some concepts here, at least as part of a "hurry up" kind of attack.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, poorboysrev said:

Right...Cam always plays best when we go uptempo and no huddle and play aggressive. We drafted him number 1, he's been mvp, we should play the style and tempo that suits him best in my opinion 

That's kinda what they did with read-option, but I'm not a fan.

With the receivers we have, run and shoot could potentially be the better choice.

And heck, all of us watching would sure be having a blast :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Good game so far.  Solid trench battles, two young well built defenses, and my 2 fave coaches.  Stafford is really damn good.  SEA OL is overperforming.  
    • Okay then. To me that means Russell Wilson was Coryell. Because I see the proposition completely in the Russell Wilson punt/pass put it up for grabs mold. Count on the receiver to catch it or knock it down.    And the reason I thought that was the intent with Legette is the abysmal downfield game from 2023. As in, there was barely any.   I look at it as if… the result of a deep attempt isn’t as important as the opponent understanding they have to defend it. So I was all for some 50/50s. Coryell, Walsh whoever.  I do favor the Coryell approach personally but also very much value versatility, it doesn’t have to be strict. Just make the defense defend the whole field, however you do it. It has to include downfield throws.     
    • Sold, or in the process of being sold. Could be either way. Consider this for a second... Last season, our defensive coordinator steered what many have called the worst defense in NFL history.  Canales would absolutely have been justified in firing him, and no one would have blamed him if he had.  But what did he do? He gave Evero another chance to come back and prove he could be better. Does that tell us something about Canales? I think it does. Now apply that to Bryce 😕
×
×
  • Create New...