Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Kalil


MHS831

Recommended Posts

While it may not be economical to cut Matt Kalil this season because we have a huge investment ($55m) in him,  this is just to explain that the contract was back loaded so that we can  escape the deal after the 2018 season. 

"There is a potential out after the 2018 season with $7.2M in dead cap money if Kalil is released after June 1. While 7.2 million dollars is nothing to sneeze at, that dead cap money actually spreads over 2019 ($2.4M) & 2020 ($4.8M), so if the Panthers part ways with Kalil after 2018, they will actually save $10.35M (5.4%) in 2019 cap space."

Since Kalil's cap figure counts $6.9m in 2018 and rises to $12.9m in 2019, there is little chance the GM drops that kind of coin on the worst lineman.  Furthermore, benching a $7m contract is not that unusual.  So there is a chance Kalil sits this year and there is little chance he is on the roster in 2019.

image.thumb.png.3e6ea93f0227bf4177535cbcff208196.png

Here is my theory, and my theories are never wrong 23% of the time.

Ron Rivera has been very reluctant to move Moton to LG--the obvious move.  Instead, we signed 43 linemen to audition for the LG job.  I think he wants the next Norwell to rise from the ashes and Moton to compete at LT.

So, if we can find a G in the pile of free agents, we can allow Moton to compete at LT.  Personally, I think he would be better at G, but he could be better at LT than what we have.

Potential LGs not named MOTON:

  • Tyler Larsen
  • Jeremiah Sirles
  • Amini Silatolu
  • Greg Van Roten
  • Dorian Johnson
  • Zach Banner
  • Duane Clausell
  • Brendon Mahon (UDFA) Getting a good feeling about him
  • Kyle Bosch (UDFA)
  • Taylor Hearn (UDFA)

NOTE: Signing Van Roten was interesting because it could be that Larsen, the backup C, is in the mix at LG.  If Larsen wins the LG job, Van Roten becomes the backup C, playing behind a guy who has missed 18 games in 2 seasons.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Carolina-Chuck18 said:

Kalil suck. Cut him after 18. 

 

The Panthers fans who believed what Rivera said about CAP are the same fans who believe that Moton won’t start at LG. 

One  of the reasons I posted this was I kept hearing that we were stuck with Kalil through  2019 (heard both sides). 
I feel that Moton will be a better G than T, but the way they are loading up at the LG position suggests that they really want Moton on the outside.  I think, with Gettlemen gone and Ryan Kalil in his last year (if that matters) that Rivera wanted Moton to compete with Matt.  If the best player gets the LG job, then it is Moton.  If they are satisfied that the second best available player is better at LG than Kalil is at LT, you could see Moton at LT and Larsen (for example) at G.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, MHS831 said:

While it may not be economical to cut Matt Kalil this season because we have a huge investment ($55m) in him,  this is just to explain that the contract was back loaded so that we can  escape the deal after the 2018 season. 

"There is a potential out after the 2018 season with $7.2M in dead cap money if Kalil is released after June 1. While 7.2 million dollars is nothing to sneeze at, that dead cap money actually spreads over 2019 ($2.4M) & 2020 ($4.8M), so if the Panthers part ways with Kalil after 2018, they will actually save $10.35M (5.4%) in 2019 cap space."

Since Kalil's cap figure counts $6.9m in 2018 and rises to $12.9m in 2019, there is little chance the GM drops that kind of coin on the worst lineman.  Furthermore, benching a $7m contract is not that unusual.  So there is a chance Kalil sits this year and there is little chance he is on the roster in 2019.

image.thumb.png.3e6ea93f0227bf4177535cbcff208196.png

Here is my theory, and my theories are never wrong 23% of the time.

Ron Rivera has been very reluctant to move Moton to LG--the obvious move.  Instead, we signed 43 linemen to audition for the LG job.  I think he wants the next Norwell to rise from the ashes and Moton to compete at LT.

So, if we can find a G in the pile of free agents, we can allow Moton to compete at LT.  Personally, I think he would be better at G, but he could be better at LT than what we have.

Potential LGs not named MOTON:

  • Tyler Larsen
  • Jeremiah Sirles
  • Amini Silatolu
  • Greg Van Roten
  • Dorian Johnson
  • Zach Banner
  • Duane Clausell
  • Brendon Mahon (UDFA) Getting a good feeling about him
  • Kyle Bosch (UDFA)
  • Taylor Hearn (UDFA)

NOTE: Signing Van Roten was interesting because it could be that Larsen, the backup C, is in the mix at LG.  If Larsen wins the LG job, Van Roten becomes the backup C, playing behind a guy who has missed 18 games in 2 seasons.

 

in a word...NO...Moton is a Guard and will be a guard... what RR wants is Kalil to put in the work this off season and be who he is supposed to be...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regardless of matt kalils contract and cap hit, he shouldn't be starting. I never understood ppl who say, we paid him so lets play him even tho he sucks. No, lets realize we made a mistake and bench him. Oh we paid kalil $55mil so lets keep him at LT and let cam get pummeled every other play......howabout we realize we made a mistake, bench him, get a replacement, and rememeber this stupid move in the future. I get it, at one point the players salary was correlated to the talent/impact they had. Not anymore with the salary cap going up and all these players being overpaid. Stupid ppl needa realize we decide who starts by talent. Not by how much theyre being paid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, MHS831 said:

Signing Van Roten was interesting because it could be that Larsen, the backup C, is in the mix at LG.  If Larsen wins the LG job, Van Roten becomes the backup C, playing behind a guy who has missed 18 games in 2 seasons.

I think that even if Larsen becomes our starting LG, he's still the backup center and #2 LG (I'd go Sirles at this point) steps in if R. Kalil gets injured. PLEASE NOT  SILATOLU!

This is all assuming that Moton doesn't get the LG job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, heel31ok said:

in a word...NO...Moton is a Guard and will be a guard... what RR wants is Kalil to put in the work this off season and be who he is supposed to be...

Or RR has history of being stuck his ways and wont change up for any reason. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know why but I just can see him on the left side of the line. Didn't they say that switching sides of the line is like learning how to write with your left hand after being a righty all your life? I'm just not sure really.

Matt Kalil is a liability. I don't care how much he's getting paid, bench him and let an UDFA give it a go. I'm sure they'd be better than what we have. It's Gettleman's fault we overpaid for a scrub when Andrew Whitworth was available at a cheaper price. I'll admit, I'm still salty about the deal (even though I did say I'd wait and see).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...