Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A practice facility in South Carolina?


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Forget training camp. We talkin' 'bout practice.

Could the Panthers have a practice facility in South Carolina?

Quote

It took only three questions during David Tepper’s introductory press conference before the new Carolina Panthers owner fielded a one about whether he planned to keep the team in Charlotte.

And while Tepper said Charlotte was the “logical place” for the stadium, he also said he wants to have a presence in both Carolinas.

That could mean shifting part of the team’s operations across the state line.

 

Quote

Tepper could consider building a new practice complex that includes mixed-use development, according to an industry insider who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the discussions are preliminary. Tepper is said to be open to considering sites on either side of the state line.

The Panthers’ current practice facility — located behind Bank of America Stadium on the opposite side of a rail line — includes two grass fields and another with an artificial surface. The team does not have an indoor facility, and sometimes practices at the Charlotte Convention Center during heavy rains.

 

Quote

The Dallas Cowboys in 2016 opened a state-of-the-art practice complex in suburban Frisco that features a 12,000-seat indoor facility that also hosts local high school games.

That $1.5 billion development spans 91 acres and also includes retail and restaurant space, a 16-story hotel and a sports therapy facility.

The Cowboys’ complex – dubbed the Star – could be what Tepper was referring to when he made a reference to “development” Tuesday.

 

Quote

Charlotte businessman Felix Sabates said he has spoken with Tepper about the possible benefits of doing business in South Carolina.

“David Tepper loves Charlotte. But he also has to do what’s right for him,” Sabates said Wednesday. “He has never mentioned to me anything about South Carolina. But I have mentioned it to him because sometimes I get the feeling that our city council (members) are not too willing to help anybody except themselves.”

 

Quote

Sabates put together a local ownership group to buy the Panthers early in the sale process and met with South Carolina Gov. Henry McMaster about his plans to build a new stadium near Carowinds in Fort Mill.

Sabates, a Charlotte Hornets minority owner and former NASCAR team owner, said the Carowinds site offered easy access to I-77 and ample land to build parking lots, a revenue stream that is limited at Bank of America Stadium.

 

Quote

Sabates said McMaster was receptive to having the Panthers in South Carolina, in contrast to North Carolina lawmakers, whom Sabates said did little for Panthers founder Jerry Richardson.

North Carolina did not help fund the Panthers’ renovations that began in 2013. But the state provided minimal assistance, including highway patrol for game-day traffic for several years in the mid-1990s.

Charlotte has lost a number of businesses over the years to tax-friendly South Carolina.

 

Quote

And while Tepper weighs putting a practice site in South Carolina, Sabates doesn’t get the impression the hedge fund manager is considering moving the stadium there.

“I don’t think he would do that. David loves Charlotte,” Sabates said. “He’s got huge plans for Charlotte.”

Hey, a lot of folks want him to build an indoor practice facility, right?

Like the slogan says "Two states, one team".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe a mixed use practice, mls, soccer facility. HS football doesn't mean a fraction of what it does in Texas and won't bring in didly for money. But a more diverse complex might.

If they just want indoor practice facilities they can build them where they practice now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fun fact, back in 94, the Panthers practiced at Winthrop. I remember my brother taking me.  

Truth be told, York County is killing it right now and I wouldn’t be surprised to see the Panthers practice site down here.  A few of the minority owners (or former minority owners) own chunks of land in Fort Mill and I’m sure would love to sell it to Tepper.  On top of that, Rock Hill is aggressively pursuing any and all business/tourism opportunities.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Pimpdaddy said:

...im all for cuttin SC out of the picture and making sht the Charlotte Panthers...no money for stadiums and such comes from SC but only from the good citizens of Meck Co...its Carolina not Carolinas.

The owner of the team disagrees.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sabates quotes.. more Sabates quotes....The guy is quoted in every damned article about a team he could never afford because he's the only person dumb enough to talk at length about things he has no knowledge/control over.

 

I thought Teppers comments alluded to one simple thing. Charlotte better play ball with incentives to keep the team in Charlotte or he will consider every option in the Carolinas. Both of them. 

I know players would be disappointed to have to commute to South Carolina. Most of them are walking distance to BofA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I was looking for a place in South Carolina for a practice facility. I would look in to the old knights stadium. The building is gone and was sold to Cato in 2015 but I don’t think they have done anything to it and don’t think they can afford too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, bull123 said:

sabates is a blowhard that is not an inner circle guy, but wants to be

he does make a single good point, in that CLT City Council is pathetic, and that SC is a better place to do business in

a mortgage company today announced leaving CLT and moving to Ft Mill and will create 1100 new jobs....maybe that militant protester councilman & that dimple idiot lady that all you voted for can speak to that

And the one that basically lead the charge to the bathroom bill disaster, the one that called police terrorists, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Congratulations do they know who the father is?
    • In my opinion Fitterer was probably right about not paying McCaffrey. Now not wanting to "pay RBs" in my opinion isn't something you want to set in stone, to me it all comes down to the individual.
    • Maybe I'm just not understanding, but everywhere that I have read says that signing bonuses go against the cap prorated by as much as five years. The following example uses Andrew Luck's rookie contract as an example. "Take Andrew Luck, the first overall pick in the 2012 NFL draft. Luck signed a four-year contract with the Colts worth $22.1 million and included a $14.5 million signing bonus. Rather than a $14.5 million cap hit in 2012, the Colts spread out his signing bonus over the life of his contract. The hit against the cap would be $3.625 million per year over four years instead of a direct cap hit of $14.5 million directly in 2012. This gave the Colts more leverage and cap flexibility in signing other players." https://www.the33rdteam.com/nfl-signing-bonuses-explained/ I don't know why some of you think that signing bonuses aren't counted against the cap over the length of the contract, but whatever.   "The bonus with a signing is usually the most garish aspect of a rookie contract. Bonus is the immediate cash players receive when they ink a deal. It factors into the cap, but only for the whole contract duration, in terms of salary cap calculations. In the case of Bryce Young’s $24.6 million signing bonus, that’s prorated to approximately $6.15 million per season over a four-year deal. This format allows teams to handle the cap and provides rookies with some short-term fiscal stability, which is important given the high injury risk in this league." https://collegefootballnetwork.com/how-rookie-contracts-work-in-the-nfl/ I understand how signing bonuses can be a useful tool in order to manage the cap, and as one of the article suggests, signing bonuses may become important if you have a tight cap, but the bill is always going to come due. I'm not necessarily referring to you Tuka, but it seems to me that others simply don't want to understand that fact which is why they're reacting to what I'm saying negatively. How odd. In any event, I have a better general understanding of why signing bonuses are used now, and it's generally to fit salaries under the cap. Surely players, whether they be rookies or not, love a signing bonus because they get a good portion of their money up front. This in turn gives them more security and probably amounts to tax benefits as well. I also understand why teams would not want to use signing bonuses, particularly for players or draftees who have a higher probability of being gone before a contract even ends.
×
×
  • Create New...