Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers among league’s worst at running into brick walls


Manther

Recommended Posts

According to Josh Hermsmeyer (@friscojosh on Twitter), the Panthers run the ball against at least 7 man boxes on early downs more often than all but 3 other teams....

According to this chart, the Panthers have a run success rate of 31% and a drop back success rate of 48%. With that in mind, it makes little sense for the Panthers to devote roughly two thirds of these plays to the run.

https://www.derp/2018/6/14/17463436/carolina-panthers-among-leagues-worst-at-running-into-brick-walls?utm_campaign=catscratchreader&utm_content=chorus&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter

 

Tell us what we didn't already know.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

I don't know if this really applies irt running into a brick wall, but I know that some coaches like to take the opportunity to throw the ball deep on second and short.  If it fails, you still have 3rd and a makeable amount of yardage.  I don't remember us ever doing it.

That's because we regularly got very few or negative yards on first and 10. If we were getting 5+ yards every first down, I'd be pleased as punch, but that's hard to do against a loaded box. Our receivers weren't good enough to force the D to spread out and soften up the box.

edit: That changes this season!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, shaqattaq said:

That's because we regularly got very few or negative yards on first and 10. If we were getting 5+ yards every first down, I'd be pleased as punch, but that's hard to do against a loaded box. Our receivers weren't good enough to force the D to spread out and soften up the box.

edit: That changes this season!

I agree, it didn't happen often.  But it did happen.  

I can't remember what game it was, but after one, I went thru the play by play on nfl.com, and looked at our second and short plays.  8 times we had second and three or less, and 8 times, we ran the ball.   If you want to establish the run and then throw deep on occasion, which was our professed style, then at least 25% of the time on second and short, you should throw the ball deep just to loosen things up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

I agree, it didn't happen often.  But it did happen.  

I can't remember what game it was, but after one, I went thru the play by play on nfl.com, and looked at our second and short plays.  8 times we had second and three or less, and 8 times, we ran the ball.   If you want to establish the run and then throw deep on occasion, which was our professed style, then at least 25% of the time on second and short, you should throw the ball deep just to loosen things up.

At what point int he season was it? Newton's shoulder was still not 100% early.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of the biggest changes I’d like to see is more play action on 2nd and short. Of course there are no guarantees but I think it makes all the sense in the world to take a shot deep on a 2nd and 1 or 2 and if we don’t pick it up try running it on 3rd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CashNewton22 said:

One of the biggest changes I’d like to see is more play action on 2nd and short. Of course there are no guarantees but I think it makes all the sense in the world to take a shot deep on a 2nd and 1 or 2 and if we don’t pick it up try running it on 3rd.

I'd be happy if we just saw 2nd and short more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Saca312 said:

Logic: Stop running all the time when it doesn’t work

Rivera: “We need to go back and establish the run even more”

Something about Saints typical horrendous defense having a sudden turn around when the running game is top 10..... I wonder what the correlation is?

Saints 2017:  Ingram - 1,124 yds Kamara - 728 yds = 1,852 yds 

(11-5 NFCS champs)

Falcons 2016: Freeman - 1,079 yds Coleman - 520 yds = 1,599 yds 

(11-5 NFCS champs, SB Appearance)

Panthers 2015: J-Stew - 989 yds CAM - 636 yds = 1,625 yds 

(15-1 NFCS champs, SB Appearance)

 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean, I wouldn't classify him as elite, but he is good. Are you arguing that he's JAG? There aren't many elite pass rushers in the league today in my opinion. Carter and Thibodeuax don't seem to be. I mean, come on. Sometimes rushers get to the QB, sometimes they don't. Sometimes injuries slow a player down. I haven't seen Hutchinson enough, but he just got paid like an elite pass rushers, and we all know that Parsons is. Who else is really elite? Crosby and Watt can rain terror, at times.  Hendrickson is good, but a Johnny-come-lately. Other guys seem to be on the same level as Burns. The days of Pep or Reggie White have been gone. 
    • With Canales I'm not nearly as concerned about his mismanagement of the RB situation (which you could argue is being overblown to a degree yes) as I am with how woefully inept he is at preparing coaching and managing his team on gamedays against opponents and their coaching staffs with winning records. The team has been blown off the field too many times under his watch now. But I will concede that even if we fire him we will just end up with another figurehead of sorts. It's plainly obvious or at least it should be that our ownership is still meddling and pulling strings.
    • It's definitely not but what he and Darnold and now Jones are all doing does show that if you have a guy who checks a lot of the prerequisite boxes putting them in the right situation can make all the difference. The problem for the folks wanting to apply this logic to Bryce is that little "checks a lot of the prerequisite boxes" issue.
×
×
  • Create New...