Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers played more zone defense than any NFL team last year


Manther

Recommended Posts

https://pantherswire.usatoday.com/2018/06/20/panthers-played-more-zone-defense-than-any-nfl-team-last-year/

...There are a lot of reasons why a team might prefer playing more zone. In Carolina’s case, the major one may be about hiding its holes in the secondary.

The Panthers have the top linebacker corps in the league and all three starters have no problem covering receivers one on one. The problem is their defensive backs get burned for big gains far too much when playing man. That’s also a reason why they blitzed more than most teams in the NFL, too.

 

With Worely gone, and the new additions, we should have smaller/fewer holes.  I too believe we blitzed more to compensate for our weak secondary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand some zone, especially to hide corners and it fits the system at times.  But my biggest issue with zone...

It's not like we're playing the worst QBs in the league.  In division, you get Brees and Ryan twice. Last year, we also played Brady, Stafford, Wentz, Rodgers, and even a guy like McCown in NY is smart enough to pick his spots against a zone.  Like it or not, you HAVE to play more man now to not allow QBs the luxury of having their receivers sit alone 8 yards down field with nobody within 5 yards of them.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, CarolinaNCSU said:

I understand some zone, especially to hide corners and it fits the system at times.  But my biggest issue with zone...

It's not like we're playing the worst QBs in the league.  In division, you get Brees and Ryan twice. Last year, we also played Brady, Stafford, Wentz, Rodgers, and even a guy like McCown in NY is smart enough to pick his spots against a zone.  Like it or not, you HAVE to play more man now to not allow QBs the luxury of having their receivers sit alone 8 yards down field with nobody within 5 yards of them.  

Yes.  Strategy for zone is different for man to man.  You flood zones and work the seams.  In man to man you exploit mismatches.  You have to keep the offense guessing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Manther said:

https://pantherswire.usatoday.com/2018/06/20/panthers-played-more-zone-defense-than-any-nfl-team-last-year/

...There are a lot of reasons why a team might prefer playing more zone. In Carolina’s case, the major one may be about hiding its holes in the secondary.

The Panthers have the top linebacker corps in the league and all three starters have no problem covering receivers one on one. The problem is their defensive backs get burned for big gains far too much when playing man. That’s also a reason why they blitzed more than most teams in the NFL, too.

 

With Worely gone, and the new additions, we should have smaller/fewer holes.  I too believe we blitzed more to compensate for our weak secondary.

You're fuging dreaming. It's the same if not worse than last year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The reality is our defense blitzed too often with poor coverage behind it particularly our safety play. We were also too predictable in our blitzes and rarely disguised them. We didn't have the players to play a lot of man but this year will be different.  We are still going to use a lot of zone but should be less predictable and use more variety in our coverage.  Add we have more athletic and fast corners and the result will be much better than last year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, panthers55 said:

The reality is our defense blitzed too often with poor coverage behind it particularly our safety play. We were also too predictable in our blitzes and rarely disguised them. We didn't have the players to play a lot of man but this year will be different.  We are still going to use a lot of zone but should be less predictable and use more variety in our coverage.  Add we have more athletic and fast corners and the result will be much better than last year. 

This is right.

 

2 minutes ago, RumHam said:

You're fuging dreaming. It's the same if not worse than last year. 

This is wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RumHam said:

You're fuging dreaming. It's the same if not worse than last year. 

And you have no clue what you are talking about.  But if you keep saying negative things about the team you might finally be right about something.  But not about this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, panthers55 said:

And you have no clue what you are talking about.  But if you keep saying negative things about the team you might finally be right about something.  But not about this.

you've seen the future? on paper, we have two rookies who are considered potential secondary starters. We have one "veteran" starting corner with Bradberry. Adams is 37 and if you think Kurt fell off, very good chance Adams will too. We already have a practice squad player potentially beating out the free agent corner we signed. I'm sorry, but hopefully i'm wrong, but i would not go into a season with this secondary. We started two rookie corners two years ago and we finished badly. The article even says we had to blitz to hide our bad secondary last year. If they ball out, great, but this will be our achilles heel, if anything this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, RumHam said:

you've seen the future? on paper, we have two rookies who are considered potential secondary starters. We have one "veteran" starting corner with Bradberry. Adams is 37 and if you think Kurt fell off, very good chance Adams will too. We already have a practice squad player potentially beating out the free agent corner we signed. I'm sorry, but hopefully i'm wrong, but i would not go into a season with this secondary. We started two rookie corners two years ago and we finished badly. The article even says we had to blitz to hide our bad secondary last year. If they ball out, great, but this will be our achilles heel, if anything this season.

We dont talk about Pepper's age or Thomas Davis as a big deal.  Brady is 41.  Age is surely a factor but it isnt the most important one.  Adams was an all pro in 2015 at 34.  He still a good player.  While he likely has lost a step, he makes up for it based on experience and leadership and being in the right place at the right time. 

We have 4 corners with starting experience, Munnerlyn, Bradberry, Cockrell, and Doss. And the article said we blitzed last year to cover up a poor secondary it didn't say we hadn't made improvements. Or if it did it is uninformed much like you. So if you want any credibility at all how about stating facts to support your position instead of making things up and taking a sky is falling approach.  

And anyone who has been here for years and pays attention also would admit that when I predict things I am right much more than wrong.  I observe what is going on, listen to the experts, pay attention to how things are evolving. Then I make educated inferences based on patterns and history and make my predictions.  Instead of deciding what I think ahead of time and only pay attention to those things that fit my preconceived notion like you are doing.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RumHam said:

you've seen the future? on paper, we have two rookies who are considered potential secondary starters. We have one "veteran" starting corner with Bradberry. Adams is 37 and if you think Kurt fell off, very good chance Adams will too. We already have a practice squad player potentially beating out the free agent corner we signed. I'm sorry, but hopefully i'm wrong, but i would not go into a season with this secondary. We started two rookie corners two years ago and we finished badly. The article even says we had to blitz to hide our bad secondary last year. If they ball out, great, but this will be our achilles heel, if anything this season.

Cockrell || practice squad player>>>Worely.  Worely was one of the worst corners in the league.  Cockrell is average.  We had to to make changes to compensate.  I don't think that will be the case anymore.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

We dont talk about Pepper's age or Thomas Davis as a big deal.  Brady is 41.  Age is surely a factor but it isnt the most important one.  Adams was an all pro in 2015 at 34.  He still a good player.  While he likely has lost a step, he makes up for it based on experience and leadership and being in the right place at the right time. 

We have 4 corners with starting experience, Munnerlyn, Bradberry, Cockrell, and Doss. And the article said we blitzed last year to cover up a poor secondary it didn't say we hadn't made improvements. Or if it did it is uninformed much like you. So if you want any credibility at all how about stating facts to support your position instead of making things up and taking a sky is falling approach.  

And anyone who has been here for years and pays attention also would admit that when I predict things I am right much more than wrong.  I observe what is going on, listen to the experts, pay attention to how things are evolving. Then I make educated inferences based on patterns and history and make my predictions.  Instead of deciding what I think ahead of time and only pay attention to those things that fit my preconceived notion like you are doing.  

"And anyone who has been here for years and pays attention also would admit that when I predict things I am right much more than wrong."

I'm guessing that's the point of the huddle. those four corners are menacing, aren't they. Captain won't see the field and may not make the team. Saying i'm uninformed it's fuging stupid when we have differing opinions. We both know what we have on the lineup, you're just wearing rose colored glasses to make yourself feel better. I'm excited about our offense and our front 7. No one will run on us. When teams realize they don't have to run on us, that's going to be the problem. We should stomp Dallas in the first week, but taking on our rivals this year is what I fear the most. There's also the part that some of us have been here so long that we've fallen for these lies and stuck up for players being brought in. Many people here loved Godfrey and he ended up being poo. IF you just want to be told youre right, then so be it. And watching ESPN doesn't make you an expert. Let me know when you watch film on these guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CarolinaNCSU said:

I understand some zone, especially to hide corners and it fits the system at times.  But my biggest issue with zone...

It's not like we're playing the worst QBs in the league.  In division, you get Brees and Ryan twice. Last year, we also played Brady, Stafford, Wentz, Rodgers, and even a guy like McCown in NY is smart enough to pick his spots against a zone.  Like it or not, you HAVE to play more man now to not allow QBs the luxury of having their receivers sit alone 8 yards down field with nobody within 5 yards of them.  

The likes of Julio Jones and Mike Evans being covered one on one with our secondary last year? Yikes. Yeah, the secondary sucked, but we were running all of that zone and doing all of that blitzing in an effort to mask that known weakness. Yeah, we probably over-did it with the blitzing, but like Shula, Wilks' biggest weakness as a play caller is that if something isn't working he doesn't change his strategy, he just doubles down on what wasn't working to begin with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Those were the days lol 
    • Have you even been reading my posts?  I'm not so sure because you seem to insinuate that I'm expecting some monster year 1 season, but I've time and time again said I'm only expecting 800 yards from him as a rookie.  Because like you said, it's not in his control, we have a bunch of good receiving options and two 1k yard RBs in what should be a run first offense. And yes, I'm very much a T-Mac homer, I've never once denied it, I'm an Arizona alumni who has been open about that from the very first thread I made about him over 18 months ago. But that doesn't mean I'm blindly expecting him to be an All Pro as a rookie, I just know more about his game than most people here who watch his highlights and breakdowns.  Which generally focus on the things he does best and worst to highlight his best abilities (his downfield contested catches) and where he needs to improve (separation) as those are the two things fans care most about when talking about the draft. What those breakdowns don't cover much are the "boring and mundane" things he does very well and exactly what you are talking about needing for Bryce.   He was constantly used in the short passing game, whether they be WR screens or quick slants, to get the ball in his hands and let him make plays, it's why he was 5th in the Big 12 in YAC last year.  With his size and hands, when he runs a quick 5 yard slant in front of the defender and the QB delivers the ball on time with anticipation, creating buckets of separation isn't needed, he's going to make the catch and then get some YAC for a 1st down.  Go watch the 30 minute YT videos that string together every catch he made last year (or the same thing from 2023) and you'll see those plays constantly, but in the analyst breakdowns leading into the draft those things don't get discussed as much as the big plays and then the things he needs to work on, because they're just not as "sexy" to talk about as those. Per your ask... He has 3 main things he needs to improve upon, and again, "needing to improve" doesn't mean "he's terrible" at them, just things he can get better at, like all young players have things to work on. 1.  His get off at the snap.   For all the amazing things he did for us at Arizona, this was always the thing that would frustrate me the most, as he generally was a bit slow to fire off the line.  The nice thing is even in the minimal clips we've seen from rookie mini camp, his initial fire off the line already appears to have been sped up a lot, he clearly has been working on that in the lead up to the draft. 2.  His separation Yea, he's not a 6' quick twitch athlete, so his separation is never going to be at the level of a Chase or Jefferson.  I've always admitted that, but because he's not one of those guys, he also brings a lot of things that those others can't.  His catch radius and hands are why I'm not as concerned about his separation, because he's so good at making those contested catches by snatching the ball away from his body to where the defender can't get to it to break it up. But yes, he does still need to get better here, just as all rookies have things to improve upon. 3.  Using his body more physically This is something that he did at times, but he also is just a great athlete for his size and would often rely on his physical abilities to make defenders miss him in the open field than just power through them, which is fine in college.  But yes, at the next level, as he gets older and stronger, I'd like to see him use it more like Evans does, and that will come with time as he builds strength and develops that part of his game. Again, I implore you to to spend an hour watching those "Every catch from the X season" for his last two years in college.  If/when you do, I think you're going to be very surprised by the number of times we used him in the short passing game and let him gain YAC to move the ball down the field.
×
×
  • Create New...