Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rosinski brings out the tinfoil hat


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Gotta assume "Marty" is referring to Marty Hurney.

Oliver Luck has directly denied that Andrew staying in school had anything to do with the Panthers, but even if that's true it doesn't negate the possibility that Archie Manning might have said something to him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Gotta assume "Marty" is referring to Marty Hurney.

Oliver Luck has directly denied that Andrew staying in school had anything to do with the Panthers, but even if that's true it doesn't negate the possibility that Archie Manning might have said something to him.

Cam > Luck 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Moo Daeng said:

Yep. Timeline is off.

So then the question becomes whether Rosinski actually got this story from Hurney or just made it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looked back a little further.  Turns out there were two pie chart stories.

Richardson's "uncomfortable" press conference occurred on January 4th, 2011.  During that infamous presser, he pulled out a pie chart which was supposed to show that the NFL wasn't making as much money as was claimed.  This occurred three days before Luck's announcement on January 7th.  The incident where Richardson asked Drew Brees and Peyton Manning whether they knew how to read a pie chart occurred a month later on February 5th during an NFL/NFLPA negotiating session.

Now that said, Rosinski's story pretty clearly seems to be referencing the second incident, because why would Brees or Manning have cared about the first? It didn't involve either of them.

Is it possible Rozinski is just confusing the story (or that Hurney was, depending on who the ultimate source actually is)?  Perhaps what Archie Manning actually said was "good thing your kid stayed in school" or something of that sort.

Or perhaps nothing at all.  Who can say?

Regardless, without some clarification/revision, the story doesn't sound especially credible at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Which is why I'm all for trading Lamelo. Guy misses half of every season. I swear he just likes to sit on the bench to show off his street clothes. I think it negatively impacts the other guys who do the same. If guys don't want to play, they don't need to be here. Coach and gm need to get stricter
    • See, I have a different view of it. I think that just the opposite is very true, and often proven on our very own team.  Look at the impact that CMC had when he was here.  Look at how bring in two top rate IOL to play guard last season made a huge difference in finally getting a stable front for Bryce to live behind. It took a while for it to bear fruit, but those last games were just relevatory. And off ball linebackers like Luke Kuechly, not just running a defense but dictating the game when he's on the field, truly remarkable what a difference that makes. Personally, he had as much or maybe even more to do with that Super Bowl appearance as Cam did.  What I see in the NFL is teams trying hard to cover up for a lack of good linebackers by stacking the D-line. But it gives them a crust defense, one that is hard and crunchy on the outside but a feast within. Linebackers shouldn't just rule the middle of the field, but should be directing traffic and working as enforcers.  But hey, whatever. "Devalued" positions often come back to bite you in the ass when they are neglected. Ask anyone who has had to clean up the mess left behind by a former college coach who took over a pro team and brought their college recruiting mindset in. Yanno, like Matt Rhule did.   
    • I see it this way--XL was raw.  Raw players when drafted who are forced to start immediately are very raw players in the NFL-- How is he helped? TMac will shift the focus of the defense away from XL.  XL will be more experienced.  He will have an offseason of jugs work.  He is a very good athlete.  He can only get better.  Wallace?  Same thing.  He will get better with an improved defensive front and the addition of these heat-seeking head hunters at S.  I think about the players we will have on defense in 2025 that we did not have in 2024. Derrick Brown. DE Brown III NT Wharton DE Jones Edge Moehrig S Princely. Edge Scourton. Edge Ransom. S Cam Jackson NT Roseboom  LB While we may not know what we have, we know what we don't have--  
×
×
  • Create New...