Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Last year, or first year?


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Jerry Richardson is gone. It's likely he won't be setting foot in Panthers facilities ever again. David Tepper is now in charge of anything and everything Panthers related...

..sort of.

Tepper has already acknowledged that he has a steep learning curve ahead of him for at least the next year or so. Add in that for the moment, his primary responsibility is still running his hedge fund. Kent Babb speculated that he'll make a transition to Panthers ownership being his primary thing within the next year or so, but we don't know that for certain.

There's talk of a team president being named, and while that may happen soon it hasn't yet. Outside of Tina Becker's "resignation", Richard Thigpen's firing (no quotes needed) and a few title changes and minor hirings that Tepper didn't really have anything to do with, the organization is largely the same as it was before he took over.

So with that in mind, will you regard this coming season as the last of the Richardson era or the first of the Tepper era?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, dpm0409 said:

First of the Tepper era for me. 

He now officially owns the team, sooo idk how it could still be classified as the JR era?  Just my opinion though.

If someone put together an organization with zero input from you and you just purchased it, would you deserve credit for any success they had?

I firmly believe that Tepper will put his stamp on the organization, but I question whether that's going to be this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jackofalltrades said:

Good question, not sure. I’ll probably write it off as a transitional year and hope for the best. 

I think that's probably how a lot of folks will see it, and it's fair.

If you had to choose one or the other though...that's the premise of the question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Moo Daeng said:

You are obsessed with Richardson

I'm obsessed with good discussion.

You're obsessed with trying to convince people you're better or smarter than you actually are, hence why you dump on other people's comments so much.

FYI: That's also what makes you boring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I read that Pittsburgh is a possibility.  I think of college QB studs who had some form of mental quirk yet tons of talent--but their issue made being a team leader difficult and it led to their demise--going back:  Jamarcus Russell, Art Schlichter, Jeff George, etc. I think people forget that the QB must not only have talent, but they must lead.  
    • I wish I knew more details, but the NIL money to 20-year olds combined with easy access to gambling sites is a side effect that these kids may not have considered.  To your point,A famous 2009 Sports Illustrated article titled “How (and Why) Athletes Go Broke” estimated that 78% of retired NFL players go bankrupt or face significant financial stress within two years of leaving the league.  I am guessing that ego and $$$ and the thrill of competition (most pro athletes love competition because they are the winners) makes it a powerful temptation.  Throw in the ease of gambling on your phone which is always in your hand, and I see your point x 10.
    • Freeling got some reps at RT when they gave Moton a rest day--I sorta hope Freeling gets brought along slowly as you describe.  It would be better for him for reasons you provide.  We have a really good problem. 
×
×
  • Create New...