Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is Eric Reid invisible?


Udogg

Recommended Posts

29 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

In the end, we just don't know what it would do to the team's locker room chemistry or if he'd become a huge distraction. His abilities aside, I'd rather not take the risk if I were a team owner/manager/coach.

Don’t think he would really be that much bigger of a distraction than someone like Smith has the potential to be. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, PantherNation123 said:

Yeah you have literally 0 evidence that this is true. We have no idea what he is asking nor do we know if we have even been in touch

Honestly, I can understand on some level us not reaching out (the distraction), but to claim he is asking for above market value as the reason is just so obtuse. 

Edit: and clearly he is fuging good enough

Reid has slid back some on his play abilities and is not the player he was and he is not worth a big paycheck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CRA said:

Don’t think he would really be that much bigger of a distraction than someone like Smith has the potential to be. 

 

This is about the rift between the owners and players; no owner wants a player putting him in a bad situation--forced to support black lives matter and lose 30% of your white paying customers or support standing for the Anthem and lose the locker room. I do not agree with the 30% who think the players should stand, but I understand the economics behind it.  Does Reid pose a threat on that level?  Probably.  The NFL owners, after all, are not supporting patriotism over civil rights--they are concerned about the bottom line.  Does that excuse their lack of empathy?  their lack of creativity and leadership to come up with a viable solution?  Their lack of a backbone?

I 100% support the players' position, but I do not think they should act in any manner that might cause the owners to lose customers.  You have first amendment rights, but if you exercise those to offend the client in any business, you are subject to termination and exclusion. The NFL owners are risking their money to put people in the seats and to attract TV viewers to watch football without politics.  Having said that, the players are in a position to lead, but most leaders become martyrs and are willing to pay that price--Jesus, Lincoln, MLK, Ghandi---etc.  Is it right?  Who decides?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

 

This is about the rift between the owners and players; no owner wants a player putting him in a bad situation--forced to support black lives matter and lose 30% of your white paying customers or support standing for the Anthem and lose the locker room. I do not agree with the 30% who think the players should stand, but I understand the economics behind it.  Does Reid pose a threat on that level?  Probably.  The NFL owners, after all, are not supporting patriotism over civil rights--they are concerned about the bottom line.  Does that excuse their lack of empathy?  their lack of creativity and leadership to come up with a viable solution?  Their lack of a backbone?

I 100% support the players' position, but I do not think they should act in any manner that might cause the owners to lose customers.  You have first amendment rights, but if you exercise those to offend the client in any business, you are subject to termination and exclusion. The NFL owners are risking their money to put people in the seats and to attract TV viewers to watch football without politics.  Having said that, the players are in a position to lead, but most leaders become martyrs and are willing to pay that price--Jesus, Lincoln, MLK, Ghandi---etc.  Is it right?  Who decides?

Didnt you get the memo?  Unless you support the players right to say and do whatever they want, whenever they want, you do not "100% support the players position".  You are either with them or you are with the enemy.  No middle ground to internet social justice warriors. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, tondi said:

Didnt you get the memo?  Unless you support the players right to say and do whatever they want, whenever they want, you do not "100% support the players position".  You are either with them or you are with the enemy.  No middle ground to internet social justice warriors. 

Yes, we are a polarized nation right now.  I can agree with the premise, just disagree with the platform. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The Seahawks won an emotional, divisional, overtime rivalry game vs the Rams on a Thursday night (Dec 18).  That gives them 10 days to prepare for the Panthers, but the Christmas holiday fell a week later--I bet they were afforded an extra day for travel-many coming back east.  Following the Panthers, Seattle plays at San Francisco for the division title (in all probability).   The Rams finish the season with games against the Falcons and Cardinals, two likely wins, pushing them to 13-4.  The Niners finish the season with home games against the Bears and Seahawks. Seattle finishes the season with the Panthers on the road and SF in California.   It is easy to see how preparing for the Panthers, during the holiday break and with the Niners waiting for them in SF a week later for (what could be) the NFC West title and #1 Seed in the NFC, could create the perfect trap game scenario.  The Panthers at home are 5-2.   In the past 2 weeks, the Seahawks struggled to beat the Phillip Rivers Colts in Seattle and then pulled off a miraculous, emotional victory at home vs. the Rams.  I am not convinced that they are as good as advertised. Seattle is a TD favorite in Charlotte.  I feel that Carolina by 3 may be more accurate.  While I am still not confident in this team's consistency and it never seems to dominate, it sure feels like a trap game for Seattle to me.  How could they NOT be thinking of San Francisco right now?  They are not used to being in this position (current players) and it is human nature.  Carolina 27, Seattle 24. 
    • It is a tough decision.  There is another factor.  Is he in game shape?  A tired Hunt is not better than an "in-shape" Corbett.  When coming off an injury, it is natural to want to protect the injured area, even if it is completely healed.  This can cause you to contort your body for no reason, lose fundamentals, and it could lead to other injuries.  For example, I had a knee in high school that required getting taped.  That made me aware of the knee (not used to tape on my knee) and I pulled my groin (favoring or dragging the leg with the tape).  The trainer explained the groin injury the way I do here--but scared money makes no money.  If he is cleared to play, he is cleared to play.  Watch him, rotate him in for a series, etc.  Specifically, I would want to watch the matchup--who is winning more--Corbett or Hunt?  How is the defense reacting (if at all) to Hunt being in?  Etc.  
    • Shannon was sued for $50 million (settled out of court, I believe) for forcing sex on his girlfriend during a two-year relationship.  He denies it, but ESPN let him go last April.  Chad Johnson's wife filed a police report because he head-butted her in a car and was put on probation. I had to google it.  I watched the Ray Rice video and when you see it, you realize just how vile and cowardly abusing a woman really is.  But for the same point Aussie tried to make, these women are defenseless, and being phyiscally bigger and stronger does not validate your actions.   I can't even stand to watch Steve Smith.  I can't normalize this kind of behavior--again, I do not think R-P had that in mind when he posted this.  When the reason was exposed, we should realize that we are talking life (quality of) and death (in some cases) here.  
×
×
  • Create New...