Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Could Saints be trouble this season


Recommended Posts

I know a few on here hate to admit it, but they are a very good team.....and Brees is still a great QB. They will be in the hunt this year again. Just telling it the way it is. They are the team we have to beat to win the South.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

    Two things I can't stand. Folks who ask a question in their title. Then provide no context, nor offer up an answer in their OP. And the Dutch. 

Anyone can post something whether it is a question in title or anything else for that matter. Why are you complaining about how someone comments/posts?  If you don't like it there is a way to not click and read it plain and simple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rbsponsel52 said:

Easy way to not read anything is not to click and read very simple.

 

    See...therein lies the problem. You asked a question in your title. Would it not seem logical that the answer, or your take on the answer, would be in the OP?

 

    Now, with that said. How am I to find such answers, without opening said thread? 

 

    You tricked me into opening this...thing. Then got upset when I mention the problem with this...thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

    See...therein lies the problem. You asked a question in your title. Would it not seem logical that the answer, or your take on the answer, would be in the OP?

 

    Now, with that said. How am I to find such answers, without opening said thread? 

 

    You tricked me into opening this...thing. Then got upset when I mention the problem with this...thing.

That is the saddest thing in this forum. People always have to criticize others just because they do not like what is typed in. Try this instead. Read and just make a positive comment or statement and leave it at that. Don't need all that negative crap in here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He can’t even learn to run routes. No chance in hell he can do both that and pick up blocking schemes 
    • Well he had essentially a 70% completion rate for almost three thousand yards.  Biggest issues were awkward and inconsistent release.  I wouldn't call arm strength bad, but not great.    
    • I see him being better and most of that is a few downfield passes that were seemingly non existent.    But it is what is around him that has dictated the trajectory more than the quarterbacking. He is game manager level and unable to dictate to defenses.  And even if I am wrong and he is the reason we ‘upwarded’, we are bumping our heads on the ceiling and only making meager gains. If it is an incline it is awfully shallow degree wise. Like a finance graph that tracks your progress and hovers around the rate of inflation. Barely breaking even.  Is that where you want your money?  We make up these deadlines expectations and generally he does the minimum of what he needs to do to hang around.    It does not encourage me to believe that when we get into a game against a good run d that we cannot break down with our run game, to believe that we can pivot to the air and successfully counter their strategy.  But they run it back again. Of course I am gunshy of a repeat of the same thing we have watched for three years.    oh, and yes his durability is his most impressive positive for my money. I fear the other shoe dropping on that and the contractual consequences that will follow.   Last  of all, too late to edit my mistake here but would like to acknowledge it: the last three years has done very little to convince me that I was not wrong in not wanting him. One too many “not”s. 
×
×
  • Create New...