Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

We had the slowest paced offense in 2017, currently tied for 4th slowest this season

GoobyPls

By GoobyPls,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

caatfan Newbie

caatfan

Posted
Posted

The Colts have the fastest pace. How's that working for them? The Saints, at 4-1 and with the most points in the league, are only .44 sec and 3 positions ahead of us. I would submit that in the world of significant stats, this one is near the bottom of the barrel. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Doc Holiday Grand Master

Doc Holiday

Posted
Posted
36 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

We will probably have the slowest pace by season end

https://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/pacestats

 

https://pantherswire.usatoday.com/2018/07/16/panthers-offense-played-at-slowest-pace-in-the-nfl-last-season/

 

It’s sad knowing Cam and this offense will never reach their full potential under this regime.

This is a faulty stat, you slow the offense to give the defense rest, the defense is currently and obviously been struggling lately. So big suprise the offense slows it’s pace of play.

NOTE.

After further review!!! this is a garbage stat. And means nothing. Panthers average .56 seconds slower per play pace than the New Orleans Saints.

stat means nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DeAngelo Beason Mentor

DeAngelo Beason

Posted
Posted

So infuriating.  It'd be one thing if there were a tangible benefit and the defense were actually playing well and the rest helped them.  This defense sucks, so why not speed up the offense, keep the opposing defense on their heels, and go for the jugular?  You win football games by scoring points.  Period.  Defense is a good thing, but in the end, you've gotta score.  We are the least aggressive offense in the NFL by a very large margin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
London Loves Luke Newbie

London Loves Luke

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, DeAngelo Beason said:

So infuriating.  It'd be one thing if there were a tangible benefit and the defense were actually playing well and the rest helped them.  This defense sucks, so why not speed up the offense, keep the opposing defense on their heels, and go for the jugular?  You win football games by scoring points.  Period.  

Lol, this is exactly what's wrong with everyone complaining about this stat. You don't "win football games by scoring points.  Period." You win football games by scoring more points than your opponents. If that means limiting how much time your opponent has to score points, it means you have a better chance of winning. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pantherclaw Grand Master

pantherclaw

Posted
Posted
13 hours ago, GoobyPls said:

We will probably have the slowest pace by season end

https://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/pacestats

 

https://pantherswire.usatoday.com/2018/07/16/panthers-offense-played-at-slowest-pace-in-the-nfl-last-season/

 

It’s sad knowing Cam and this offense will never reach their full potential under this regime.

Yet we are 3-1. 

I didn't bother to click the link. It's pointless. 

I don't want a fast paced offense, unless we have to score. 

You don't control a game with a face paced offense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DeAngelo Beason Mentor

DeAngelo Beason

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, London Loves Luke said:

Lol, this is exactly what's wrong with everyone complaining about this stat. You don't "win football games by scoring points.  Period." You win football games by scoring more points than your opponents. If that means limiting how much time your opponent has to score points, it means you have a better chance of winning. 

Hence me using the term "defense is a good thing", which you conveniently didn't mark bold.

You're utterly delusional if you think that running the ball and playing defense in today's NFL is a winning formula.  The I-formation don't work like it used to buddy.  Defenses can stop that in their sleep - then they send they're 5 receiver sets out and massacre you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DeAngelo Beason Mentor

DeAngelo Beason

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

Yet we are 3-1. 

I didn't bother to click the link. It's pointless. 

I don't want a fast passed offense, unless we have to score. 

You don't control a game with a face paced offense. 

Disagree.  You absolutely can control a game with a fast paced offense.  Especially in the league today.  You put much more pressure on the opposing offense when they know they have to score to keep up.  

 

It's a tried and true formula that works AGAINST the Panthers very often.  If you get a lead on us, we're not coming back from it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pantherclaw Grand Master

pantherclaw

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, London Loves Luke said:

Lol, this is exactly what's wrong with everyone complaining about this stat. You don't "win football games by scoring points.  Period." You win football games by scoring more points than your opponents. If that means limiting how much time your opponent has to score points, it means you have a better chance of winning. 

So many fans have no concept of basic football principles. 

You beat good teams with great offenses, by keeping their offense on the sideline. How do you do that?? With time eating, long drives that score points. 

The best defense, is an offense that can sustain drives, while putting points on the scoreboard. It's what you want, especially if the defense is struggling. Even if the defense was elite, you'd want to do the same thing, to maximize winning. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pantherclaw Grand Master

pantherclaw

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, DeAngelo Beason said:

Disagree.  You absolutely can control a game with a fast paced offense.  Especially in the league today.  You put much more pressure on the opposing offense when they know they have to score to keep up.  

 

It's a tried and true formula that works AGAINST the Panthers very often.  If you get a lead on us, we're not coming back from it. 

Don't you wish anything in this post was true?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      The running back situation....

      By strato · Posted

      okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Captain Morgan
      OTA's

      By Captain Morgan · Posted

      Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • WUnderhill
      Myles Garrett Traded to Rams

      By WUnderhill · Posted

      How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...