Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

We had the slowest paced offense in 2017, currently tied for 4th slowest this season


GoobyPls

Recommended Posts

The Colts have the fastest pace. How's that working for them? The Saints, at 4-1 and with the most points in the league, are only .44 sec and 3 positions ahead of us. I would submit that in the world of significant stats, this one is near the bottom of the barrel. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

We will probably have the slowest pace by season end

https://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/pacestats

 

https://pantherswire.usatoday.com/2018/07/16/panthers-offense-played-at-slowest-pace-in-the-nfl-last-season/

 

It’s sad knowing Cam and this offense will never reach their full potential under this regime.

This is a faulty stat, you slow the offense to give the defense rest, the defense is currently and obviously been struggling lately. So big suprise the offense slows it’s pace of play.

NOTE.

After further review!!! this is a garbage stat. And means nothing. Panthers average .56 seconds slower per play pace than the New Orleans Saints.

stat means nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So infuriating.  It'd be one thing if there were a tangible benefit and the defense were actually playing well and the rest helped them.  This defense sucks, so why not speed up the offense, keep the opposing defense on their heels, and go for the jugular?  You win football games by scoring points.  Period.  Defense is a good thing, but in the end, you've gotta score.  We are the least aggressive offense in the NFL by a very large margin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DeAngelo Beason said:

So infuriating.  It'd be one thing if there were a tangible benefit and the defense were actually playing well and the rest helped them.  This defense sucks, so why not speed up the offense, keep the opposing defense on their heels, and go for the jugular?  You win football games by scoring points.  Period.  

Lol, this is exactly what's wrong with everyone complaining about this stat. You don't "win football games by scoring points.  Period." You win football games by scoring more points than your opponents. If that means limiting how much time your opponent has to score points, it means you have a better chance of winning. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, GoobyPls said:

We will probably have the slowest pace by season end

https://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/pacestats

 

https://pantherswire.usatoday.com/2018/07/16/panthers-offense-played-at-slowest-pace-in-the-nfl-last-season/

 

It’s sad knowing Cam and this offense will never reach their full potential under this regime.

Yet we are 3-1. 

I didn't bother to click the link. It's pointless. 

I don't want a fast paced offense, unless we have to score. 

You don't control a game with a face paced offense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, London Loves Luke said:

Lol, this is exactly what's wrong with everyone complaining about this stat. You don't "win football games by scoring points.  Period." You win football games by scoring more points than your opponents. If that means limiting how much time your opponent has to score points, it means you have a better chance of winning. 

Hence me using the term "defense is a good thing", which you conveniently didn't mark bold.

You're utterly delusional if you think that running the ball and playing defense in today's NFL is a winning formula.  The I-formation don't work like it used to buddy.  Defenses can stop that in their sleep - then they send they're 5 receiver sets out and massacre you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

Yet we are 3-1. 

I didn't bother to click the link. It's pointless. 

I don't want a fast passed offense, unless we have to score. 

You don't control a game with a face paced offense. 

Disagree.  You absolutely can control a game with a fast paced offense.  Especially in the league today.  You put much more pressure on the opposing offense when they know they have to score to keep up.  

 

It's a tried and true formula that works AGAINST the Panthers very often.  If you get a lead on us, we're not coming back from it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, London Loves Luke said:

Lol, this is exactly what's wrong with everyone complaining about this stat. You don't "win football games by scoring points.  Period." You win football games by scoring more points than your opponents. If that means limiting how much time your opponent has to score points, it means you have a better chance of winning. 

So many fans have no concept of basic football principles. 

You beat good teams with great offenses, by keeping their offense on the sideline. How do you do that?? With time eating, long drives that score points. 

The best defense, is an offense that can sustain drives, while putting points on the scoreboard. It's what you want, especially if the defense is struggling. Even if the defense was elite, you'd want to do the same thing, to maximize winning. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DeAngelo Beason said:

Disagree.  You absolutely can control a game with a fast paced offense.  Especially in the league today.  You put much more pressure on the opposing offense when they know they have to score to keep up.  

 

It's a tried and true formula that works AGAINST the Panthers very often.  If you get a lead on us, we're not coming back from it. 

Don't you wish anything in this post was true?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • To understand why a player with all the tools to be successful in the NFL would bust is remarkably difficult.  While Isaiah Simmons has had a disappointing career to this point, there is a reason he is back in Carolina.  Yes, special teams are important and he does well in that role.  My intent is to examine in what situations he has been successful and develop a theory about the reason he might have experienced success in some capacity vs. the times he has flopped.  Is he a CB?  A Safety?  A LB?  An Edge?  No.  He has been all of them at some point and has yet to settle into a position.  I think the Panthers will do the same thing.  I think I know (besides special teams) how they might use him effectively on defense.  First, think of Simmons as a unicorn. Create a position that he does not have to fit into, but one that fits into his skill sets.  I think we need to designate him as our Big Nickel, and then we need to modify that position into something of a rover, for lack of a better term.  He is a hybrid--but lets not make him the hybrid, let's make the position the hybrid.  Isaiah Simmons has been most effective in the NFL as a Big Nickel and on special teams, specifically in sub-packages where he can leverage his elite speed (4.39 40-yard dash) without the constant physical demands of a traditional linebacker.  A big nickel is a third safety, designed to match up with the big TEs, basically, and provide better run support.   Based on what I have read, Simmons is slowed when he has to know the Xs and Os and the position is focused on complex interpretations that may require adjustments in certain situations, etc.  He excels in special teams, for example, because he is turned loose and he simple reacts to what he sees in front of him, it seems.   I think the Panthers may create a big nickel role that turns him loose on defense.       Simmons has been in the league for about 6 years and has been issued five playbooks.  His position has shifted in an effort to find where he could best fit in.  Getting back to basics, here is a chart that demonstrates how much more effective he was as a big nickel than a traditional LB, that required more reading blocking and run game schemes:     Last season, Ransom was the big nickel, the Panthers are high on him and not looking to replace him by any means.  It is my theory that Ransom will be used alongside Moehrig in some situations.  He can also provide depth behind Moehrig.  It is also my opinion that Simmons may not be the ideal fit for every situation involving the big nickel.  Simmons could be used, for example, as a blitzing big nickel who can cover the flat and stuff the run, while Ransom may be the better lock-down TE coverage guy--I dunno.  But I see Simmons playing a bigger role on D.   Here is a comparison between Ransom and Simmons: Lathan Ransom: A 2025 fourth-round pick, he is viewed as a starter candidate to provide security opposite safety Tre'von Moehrig, with the Panthers high on his potential. Isaiah Simmons: Recently re-signed (March 2026), Simmons has thrived as a special teams ace but is considered a prime candidate to develop into a big nickel linebacker/safety hybrid due to his unique versatility. Context: The Panthers' defense under Ejiro Evero requires safety depth, and both players bring different strengths to that position group. Throw in Nick Scott, a pure free safety who just signed, it is starting to get a bit clearer.  Does this mean we will not draft a S?  Not at all.  Who do we have to give depth at FS?  Let's hope its Scott. It is my view that Simmons needs to find one or two things he does well on this defense and focus on that and not everything else.  What are his natural talents (6'4" 238 and runs sub 4.4--who does that?  Can you not make that work for you?)  This tells me the problem is mental.  Too many cooks in the kitchen.  Instead of asking him to do everything behind the DL, let's get him to do one thing that aligns with his skill set and history of success.  A situational big nickel/rover seems to be a fit.    
    • Who had us getting arguably the best receiver in the draft last April? Dan believes in sticking with his board. That's what the Panthers will do. It's that simple.
×
×
  • Create New...