Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Likeliest of 3 coaching staff scenarios


davos

Recommended Posts

How would you rank the likelihood of these three scenarios?   

  • Rivera gets retained, we bring back a recently fired Steve Wilks as DC
  • Rivera gets retained, we bring back a recently fired McDermott as DC
  • Tepper cleans house.  We hire a young offensive guy (I.E. DeFillipo Dan Campbell, Bieniemy, etc.)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I see absolutely zero chance of Ron Meeks getting a job here again.

Much as I hate to say it, if Eric Washington is out and it's Rivera's choice who to replace him with, don't be surprised to see Richard Rodgers get promoted to that job.

Please no

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It all depends on the finish. If we get ourselves straightened out and make a run down the stretch I doubt anything will change. If the downward spiral continues, I think we'll see a wholesale change. I don't think Tepper will let Ron simply scapegoat Washington. If there is a change, I think we'll go with an aggressive offensive minded coach. Looking at what teams like the Chiefs, Rams, and Saints are doing and then looking at our roster, o think we have to go with an offensive minded coach. We have a franchise QB and a lot of young weapons around him in an increasingly offensive driven league. I'd love an aggressive young offensive minded coach who would bring with him a seasoned veteran DC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, davos said:

How would you rank the likelihood of these three scenarios?   

  • Rivera gets retained, we bring back a recently fired Steve Wilks as DC
  • Rivera gets retained, we bring back a recently fired McDermott as DC
  • Tepper cleans house.  We hire a young offensive guy (I.E. DeFillipo Dan Campbell, Bieniemy, etc.)

 

What we have now is really worst case scenerio.  If RR was straight up trash it would be easy to cut ties, instead we have this zombie/undead push every year to just barely make the post season and then a quick exit.  Will  RR & Norv outwit Peyton or Belichek?  It just doesn't seem like it.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

I see absolutely zero chance of Ron Meeks getting a job here again.

Much as I hate to say it, if Eric Washington is out and it's Rivera's choice who to replace him with, don't be surprised to see Richard Rodgers get promoted to that job.

Hehe...fixed the f-up but not quick enough!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Manther said:

What we have now is really worst case scenerio.  If RR was straight up trash it would be easy to cut ties, instead we have this zombie/undead push every year to just barely make the post season and then a quick exit.  Will  RR & Norv outwit Peyton or Belichek?  It just doesn't seem like it.  

 

Well record indicates they have, at least RR, outwitted Belichek..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, davos said:

How would you rank the likelihood of these three scenarios?   

  • Rivera gets retained, we bring back a recently fired Steve Wilks as DC
  • Rivera gets retained, we bring back a recently fired McDermott as DC
  • Tepper cleans house.  We hire a young offensive guy (I.E. DeFillipo Dan Campbell, Bieniemy, etc.)

 

Not gonna happen. BTW why don’t we use Olsen more?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He's not wrong though. You talk like a politician on here. Leaving yourself just enough wiggle room to say you never fully counted Bryce out if you need to....But we can all see it. Just say you think he is a bust outright and you will have to type a lot less. Obfuscating your opinion behind QB3 competitions etc....
    • Most EVs are in the 90+ e-MPG meaning some measurement house somewhere compares the EV to a similar ICE model and works out how much is costs to charge (on average) versus fill up as a point of comparison. Talking long term, in the hundreds of thousands of miles?  No clue.  Some early signs are that EV batteries maintain 80% charge over 400k miles.  So there's that.   The challenge and charm of an ICE vehicle is being able to park it under a tree, get your jack stands out and tinker with your engine.  There's just not that same level of complexity in an EV.  I saw someone estimate there are 200 or so moving parts in an EV, and 2000 in an ICE vehicle.  I'm not a part counter so I can't really speak to that. I think that the EV is more the future than any type of combustion engine.  Those will still be around in specific purposes, but for most people - an EV will be the superior option in terms of efficiency.  I say that as someone who loves stupid horsepower numbers out of turbo 4 bangers and inline 6s...  I am one of those tinkers when I can be. A bigger issue for EVs is going to be the ownership versus lease.  Right now, there are INSANE leases on EVs, which is great, but what do you have at the end of that lease?  Nada, maybe some equity if you're lucky.  Where as I'm almost done paying for my car, and plan to keep it until the wheels fall off (or my son wrecks it when he starts to drive).  Will EV makers do the smartphone thing and build in planned obsolesce?  Stop updating software?  I love the tech in EVs, and I think getting more cars and trucks off the road is a good thing.  But I am still just a little concerned.  Capitalism has gotten far too extractive.  
×
×
  • Create New...