Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers work out new kicker


OceanPanther

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Billy_T said:

Stupid decision, reeks of desperation.

Only hurts the situation. 

Also, illustrates the lack of intellectual horsepower within the organization.....Mr. Tepper will rectify this deficit asap.

How is it stupid to see if there’s a better player out there? Answer: it’s not stupid, but it doesn’t fit your narrative

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Billy_T said:

Catanzaro, Ficken and Sturgis have all been cut by other teams in 2018....and it wasn't because they were doing well.

Do you really think there's any chance one of them is a "better player" than Graham Gano?

Sure. There's a chance. Doesn't mean they are, but kicking the tires is not a bad decision when your kicker gargles on a nutsack every fourth quarter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Billy_T said:

Stupid decision, reeks of desperation.

Only hurts the situation. 

Also, illustrates the lack of intellectual horsepower within the organization.....Mr. Tepper will rectify this deficit asap.

This week it just "reeks" of sending Gano a Western Union, but if he doesn't get the telegram then they've already done the ground work. Too bad our real kicker is in Kansas City.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if this messes with gano's head and he loses (more) confidence because of the competition being brought in then we don't need him as a kicker.

he's got to be mentally tough and work this poo out in his head because right now that's what his issue is, he's in a funk and he's the only one who can get him out of it.

we still have football to play and can't really afford to wait around for him to get right so they need to get a plan B and get it rolling.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The reset worked with proton.me.. wouldn’t work with my Gmail, Yahoo or Verizon email accounts 
    • Wish they started at 5:30 or 6 at the latest so I can watch it. I have to be in bed by start time.
    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
×
×
  • Create New...