Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Let's talk Saints...


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

We may need to add a third digit to the scoreboard to accommodate the number those fugs are going to hang on us.

I definitely think 60 is a lock. 70 is very possible, since they'll wanna go for the record number of points in a single game. 

But realistically I'd say something like 63-13. We'll lose 24-21 or 27-20 to the Falcons in Week 16, then drop a tough 77-9 decision in Week 17.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, dpm0409 said:

We can't get to the QB at all on defense......and when you go up against Brees with that being the case....game over man

Hell, it was game over with Baker fuggin' Mayfield

I thank God we didn't have to play Nathan Peterman and the Bills in the regular season. Peterman's stat line would be something like 22-26, 327 yards, 4 TD. 

Just remember, he was unstoppable against us in the preseason. The worst QB in the modern NFL was Tom Brady in his prime against our starters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I will as soon as you withdraw your fandom from the Patriots. Informative threads are great but all of these estrogen and emotion driven threads you start are ridiculous.
    • Will be there tonight and expect nothing from the Canes. They are soft and won't go after anyone, nor will they respond when, not if, Florida starts bullying them. Not to mention Freddie is in net. I fear this will be an ass-kicking.  
    • Is this not a bit contradictory?  Also surely if any of us are smart enough to evaluate what we're seeing in real time, a former NFL QB can at least manage the same.  Especially considering he's basing his analysis on hours (maybe generous?) of reviewing All-22 footage which he can play back over and over again, focusing each time on different position groups, match-ups, progressions, etc. which is simply impossible for a fan to fully assess in real time.  Unless you're actually at the game, we basically only get the QB/O-line in frame during the broadcast and even in that limited window of the field, there is simply too much happening.  I'm usually broadly focusing on Bryce, maybe peeping the footwork (or lack thereof) and just the overall pocket and whether there is any pressure coming.  I'm not able to watch every individual one-on-one o-line match-up on top of it to see who got beat, who didn't pick up a blitz, which o-lineman didn't shift to help double-team, or whatever else. I think the truth is somewhere in between (as is almost always the case).  Knowing the play call, audible, etc. is pretty important when judging individual performances, which is why we should always take PFF grades with a grain of salt.  But yeah we can also get a pretty good overall sense of how a player is performing just from watching the game on the couch on Sundays.  I still think there's a lot of value in a review video like this.  As long as you have the bare minimum media literacy to take the interesting insights while also acknowledging inherent biases from a video like this (i.e. obviously focusing on the good over the bad).
×
×
  • Create New...