Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would the Panthers be interested in Greedy Williams?


micnificent28

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, WhoaaaCAM said:

He's a great player but without a pass rush no CB will succeed in our defense. I'm hoping Ed Oliver falls to us if we get pick 7

 

That’s a defensive tackle. We can’t ignore end any longer if we’re going defensive line. Peppers is 38 and addition is at least 30. Fresh legs needed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, micnificent28 said:

That’s a defensive tackle. We can’t ignore end any longer if we’re going defensive line. Peppers is 38 and addition is at least 30. Fresh legs needed.

I just said "pass rush", being able to collapse the pocket from the interior would be a godsend from our defense. At 7 we should probably go BPA and ultimately one of the big guys will likely be there at that pick. Outside of Bosa there is no edge I like inside of the top 8.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, WhoaaaCAM said:

I just said "pass rush", being able to collapse the pocket from the interior would be a godsend from our defense. At 7 we should probably go BPA and ultimately one of the big guys will likely be there at that pick. Outside of Bosa there is no edge I like inside of the top 8.

I think Gary is just as good as Oliver and has the versatility to slide inside and push for the interior same as you would get from Ed Oliver.. whom I love. But after double dipping at dt and butler I just can’t bear another defensive tackle in a super deep defensive tackle class. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We don't need CB with the 1st pick. We have Bradberry, Jackson and Cocktrel. 3 good corners. Get a CB in the 3rd. I agree DE or DT with the 1st pick unless a great OL (especially Tackle) is there. Heck an amazing C to anchor the line would be good to. No matter who, they need to hit a home run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, musicman said:

We don't need CB with the 1st pick. We have Bradberry, Jackson and Cocktrel. 3 good corners. Get a CB in the 3rd. I agree DE or DT with the 1st pick unless a great OL (especially Tackle) is there. Heck an amazing C to anchor the line would be good to. No matter who, they need to hit a home run.

I think slot was a major weakness.. we don’t know anything about cockrell. If you draft a defensive tackle he right away comes in behind Poe and short sorta of like butler was being star and short. I don’t like the idea of taking  a luxuary defensive tackle when you can get starters right away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, musicman said:

We don't need CB with the 1st pick. We have Bradberry, Jackson and Cocktrel. 3 good corners. Get a CB in the 3rd. I agree DE or DT with the 1st pick unless a great OL (especially Tackle) is there. Heck an amazing C to anchor the line would be good to. No matter who, they need to hit a home run.

No we need a good corner , we are in the NFC south and have one of the worst secondaries in the NFL . Donte Jackson is solid , cockrell is unknown , bradberry is a decent rotation corner 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, micnificent28 said:

I think slot was a major weakness.. we don’t know anything about cockrell. If you draft a defensive tackle he right away comes in behind Poe and short sorta of like butler was being star and short. I don’t like the idea of taking  a luxuary defensive tackle when you can get starters right away.

If we drafted Williams, who would you put in the slot?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

If we drafted Williams, who would you put in the slot?

Jackson moves to slot in nickel and put greedy on the outside.  Bradberry has one more year left on deal, probably let him walk after next year cuz i dont see him being worth crazy money right now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course

The dude is the mpst hyped and best projected CB to come out of DBU since Patrick Peterson 

And there has been some good ones to come out of there since.  Tre'davious White, Donte Jackson, etc.

CB isnt up there with a issue as youd see DL, OL, etc

But any time a elite CB projected top 5 falls, you grab him.  And lets not forget.  Remember the Norman fallout? This is a contract year for Bradberry coming up.  And id be weary of giving him top #1 CB $$ as inconsistent as he's been.  And if he walks after next season, itll be similar to Norman all over.  In the meantime Donte Jackson could play Nickel. And this draft is Deeep at DL so you would still get a solid player in the 2nd

 

 

But Greedy aint going to fall to us.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...