Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why do you love the Huddle?


WarPanthers89

Recommended Posts

It really is amazing how much 'content' the users of this board create.  I mean seriously, don't you people have jobs?

But even the bad threads are more entertaining than most of the crap on bleacher report or ESPN.  So here I will remain as a lurker and occasional poster.  Keep pounding

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, arbnranger said:

Mr. Scot being serious. 

LinvilleGorge being reactionary and more recently a little on the deep end.

Jangler being weird as usual.

TheSpecialJuan being funny and creepy. 

Jon Snow being a dick and sarcastic. 

The huddler posting drunk or not, who knows. 

CRA, top dawg, t96, stbugs making solid posts also what’s his name (most of the time) with Patrice in his avatar 

Captain obvious is funny. 

Nanoq of the north is super chill and level headed. 

Shout out to the Cam fans Thered and killerkat, weirdo tiger-7 and a couple others. 

There are more that I missed that I enjoy but running low on time . 

Huddle Up!

Even with the knuckleheads ( who I do sometimes get a kick out of, like PU...) the huddle is by far the greatest forum of any sports team I’ve ever seen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
    • I dont buy the idea that it would create more competitive games Given this: Seed Current Format Record Proposed Open Seeding Record 1 Lions 15–2 Lions 15–2 2 Eagles 14–3 Eagles 14–3 3 Buccaneers 10–7 Vikings 14–3 4 Rams 10–7 Commanders 12–5 5 Vikings 14–3 Rams 10–7 6 Commanders 12–5 Buccaneers 10–7 7 Packers 11–6 Packers 11–6 That would mean Wild Card round would have been Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Vikings(14/3) v Bucs(10/7) Commanders(12/5) v Rams(10/7) Instead of Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Bucs(10/7) v Commanders(12/5) Rams(10/7) v Vikings(14/3) Then with the reseed it would mean that highest remaining seed would always draw the lowest remaining team.
×
×
  • Create New...