Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Speeding Ticket

Arroz con Panther

By Arroz con Panther,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

Arroz con Panther Contributor

Arroz con Panther

Posted
Posted

I got a speeding ticket on the way to work this morning on fricken Old Pineville Road in Charlotte, of all places. 45 in a 30. That road should not be 30 and no one goes 30 on it. I'm a little annoyed, but I know the drill. Hire a lawyer, get it dismissed, pay some money. It's my first ticket in probably 10 years and my first in Mecklenburg County. I have a couple of questions:

1) Does anyone have recommendations for a good "speeding ticket" lawyer?

2) How much did you have to pay when you got your last speeding ticket?

Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dex Community Regular

Dex

Posted
Posted

Is the fine less than the cost of hiring a lawyer? Mine was $260 for doing 85 in a 55. I went to traffic court, plead guilty and ended up paying $90. They also knocked it down from a speeding violation to a non-moving violation so less points or no points on my license. Just go to traffic court and kiss some booty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Anybodyhome Grand Master

Anybodyhome

Posted
Posted

Wait a couple days and the legal ads will begin flooding your mailbox.

Other options include just going to court and pleading. Advantage is you're standing in front of the judge and he looks at you and your driving record and probably fines you less than what the mail-in cost would be.

Can also plead guilty and ask for a "Prayer for Judgment":

Unique to North Carolina, a Prayer for Judgment Continued (PJC) is often used in traffic violations. It allows someone to plead guilty and ask for a “Prayer for Judgement,” meaning the offense isn’t entered against you. For example, you plead guilty to a speeding ticket, then ask for Prayer for Judgement. If granted, the license points will not be added to your record.

While this sounds like a great deal, a successful petition is not guaranteed or automatic. In addition, Prayer for Judgements can only be used twice in five years per household. Judges use a lot of discretion and vary widely in their granting Prayer for Judgements. This can cause increased insurance rates, driver’s license suspension, employment and housing issues, and other situations that involve background checks.

With a decent driving record, this might be what really saves you some cash. Those points will likely hurt your insurance for a couple years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Johnny Rockets Rookie

Johnny Rockets

Posted
Posted

The last ticket I got was in Cabarrus county a few months ago going 70 in a 55. State trooper pointed out to me on the ticket the option of requesting a plea deal online.  Literally took about 30 seconds and within 2 days I got a response from the DA offering an improper equipment violation instead. Paid the fine online and avoided court and lawyers. Officer told me it was something fairly new and the lawyers hate it because it cuts them out of the equation and saves people a lot of time and money. 

Not sure if that is an option in your case but look into it and if it is, I recommend going that route. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Johnny Rockets said:

The last ticket I got was in Cabarrus county a few months ago going 70 in a 55. State trooper pointed out to me on the ticket the option of requesting a plea deal online.  Literally took about 30 seconds and within 2 days I got a response from the DA offering an improper equipment violation instead. Paid the fine online and avoided court and lawyers. Officer told me it was something fairly new and the lawyers hate it because it cuts them out of the equation and saves people a lot of time and money. 

Not sure if that is an option in your case but look into it and if it is, I recommend going that route. 

Yep, good old taxation via citation. 

I live right up the mountain from Morrison, CO which is one of the worst examples of this. Over half of the town's revenue is generated by traffic citations. They run this same racket. Just pay the ticket before your court date and it's automatically reduced to improper equipment. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Arroz con Panther Contributor

Arroz con Panther

Posted
  • Author
Posted
7 minutes ago, Johnny Rockets said:

The last ticket I got was in Cabarrus county a few months ago going 70 in a 55. State trooper pointed out to me on the ticket the option of requesting a plea deal online.  Literally took about 30 seconds and within 2 days I got a response from the DA offering an improper equipment violation instead. Paid the fine online and avoided court and lawyers. Officer told me it was something fairly new and the lawyers hate it because it cuts them out of the equation and saves people a lot of time and money. 

Not sure if that is an option in your case but look into it and if it is, I recommend going that route. 

I read about that this morning. You can cut your speed to 9 mph over. I don't think your insurance goes up at 9, but I wasn't sure if you still received points on your license. I'll need to look into it a little bit more. I worry about going through the hassle, it not working, and then still having to lawyer up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bronn Contributor

Bronn

Posted
Posted

1. Get a printed out copy of your nice, clean driving record.

2. Show up for court the day you've been assigned.

3. Talk to the state's lawyer as you are called up to face the judge, and ask that they consider your nice, clean driving record and say something along the lines of you "not wanting to be financially penalized over the span of three years for an honest mistake" and that you "have demonstrated that you are a safe, aware driver" with your nice, clean driving record.

If you get a good draw on who you're talking to/dealing with that day, they might reduce it to something like "improper equipment" or dismiss the charge completely. You might still have to pay court costs (not sure what they are there) if you get it reduced or thrown out, but it should be less than a lawyer would charge you.

You don't HAVE to pay a lawyer to represent you. It is merely a convenience thing for most people.

At worst, if they deny your attempts at getting the charge reduced to something that won't add points to your license, you can ask for a Prayer for Judgement or a continuance to buy you more time to just go out and find a lawyer that will get it dismissed for you.

A speeding ticket really isn't much of anything, especially if you are willing to face the state/judge and demonstrate you're a responsible adult that is capable of handling your own business.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Arroz con Panther Contributor

Arroz con Panther

Posted
  • Author
Posted
22 minutes ago, Johnny Rockets said:

The last ticket I got was in Cabarrus county a few months ago going 70 in a 55. State trooper pointed out to me on the ticket the option of requesting a plea deal online.  Literally took about 30 seconds and within 2 days I got a response from the DA offering an improper equipment violation instead. Paid the fine online and avoided court and lawyers. Officer told me it was something fairly new and the lawyers hate it because it cuts them out of the equation and saves people a lot of time and money. 

Not sure if that is an option in your case but look into it and if it is, I recommend going that route. 

I believe this is what you were talking about: https://www.obsentinel.com/news/new-online-system-makes-processing-speeding-tickets-faster-easier/article_bc4761ee-be4a-11e7-aad8-7b21ad15c3b8.html

This is the part that scares me:

Quote

 If the district attorney offers an online reduction, the reduced charge, in the district attorney’s discretion, will be nine miles over the posted limit or improper equipment. 

If it gets dropped due to improper equipment, then I just pay the fine and I'm good. If it gets reduced to 9 mph over, it won't affect my insurance, but I think I still get points on my license. That's what I need to look into.

Edit: Just found this: A 9-over reduction does lead to a speeding conviction with two to three license points accumulated (2 points if the speed limit is less than 55 mph and 3 points if the speed limit is more than 55 mph), but these points will not impact your insurance premium if you have no active license points and would be removed from your driving record after three years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bronn Contributor

Bronn

Posted
Posted

You really should just go in person rather than dealing with any kind of online convenience thing IMHO.

I had a DA's rep once act like he didn't understand why I was showing him my driving record (which wasn't spot free by any means) and what exactly I wanted him to do for me.

I literally said:

"Look, sir. I've provided you with evidence that I am a somewhat safe and responsible driver, with both my driving record and by me being here today. I might have been going a little fast that day (12 mph over the limit,) but that choice should not impact me financially in the form of insurance hikes, etc. over the next three years."



He then turned to the judge and said, "Judge, the state moves to reduce these charges to improper equipment."

I paid my court costs (it was like 4-5 years ago, and I think it was to the tune of $185) and was on my way as if nothing ever happened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Johnny Rockets Rookie

Johnny Rockets

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, Arroz con Panther said:

I believe this is what you were talking about: https://www.obsentinel.com/news/new-online-system-makes-processing-speeding-tickets-faster-easier/article_bc4761ee-be4a-11e7-aad8-7b21ad15c3b8.html

This is the part that scares me:

If it gets dropped due to improper equipment, then I just pay the fine and I'm good. If it gets reduced to 9 mph over, it won't affect my insurance, but I think I still get points on my license. That's what I need to look into.

Edit: Just found this: A 9-over reduction does lead to a speeding conviction with two to three license points accumulated (2 points if the speed limit is less than 55 mph and 3 points if the speed limit is more than 55 mph), but these points will not impact your insurance premium if you have no active license points and would be removed from your driving record after three years. 

That is odd because I was offered improper equipment and no points on my license. I wouldn't take 9 mph over, as that will be points on your license and with your clean driving record you should get nothing. I mentioned it because it worked for me and was extremely convenient and took about 5 mins of my time and some $ but much less than a layer would have cost me.   If that isn't going to work for you, show up as Bronn said. I just liked that I got the same outcome without any of the hassle. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Johnny Rockets Rookie

Johnny Rockets

Posted
Posted
41 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yep, good old taxation via citation. 

I live right up the mountain from Morrison, CO which is one of the worst examples of this. Over half of the town's revenue is generated by traffic citations. They run this same racket. Just pay the ticket before your court date and it's automatically reduced to improper equipment. 

 Maybe some see it as a racket but I was legit speeding so I only have myself to blame and appreciated the convenience. No court, no lawyers, no hassle. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Johnny Rockets said:

 Maybe some see it as a racket but I was legit speeding so I only have myself to blame and appreciated the convenience. No court, no lawyers, no hassle. 

It doesn't necessarily automatically qualify as a racket, but when you have municipalities that are literally funding their existence through traffic citations and create a streamlined method to collecting those "taxes" to encourage quick payment and discourage any resistance then yeah, I think that qualifies as a racket. The state of Colorado tried a couple of years ago to enact legislation limiting the percentage of revenue a municipality can drive through traffic citations but it failed. Some states have similar laws already on the books.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Zaximus Grand Master

Zaximus

Posted
Posted

I got a ticket some years back on 485, like a 85 in a 65 at that time.    I went into the Mecklenberg courthouse, got in line, and a guy was walking down the line looking at your ticket.    Took mine, marked it to 7 over and said go there and pay fine.    I went and paid fine, and then left.     Basically he was going down the line doing it for everyone.

I wouldn't worry about a lawyer honestly, just go in there and take care of your business.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • ForJimmy
      Emanuel McNeil Warren + Jacob Rodriguez

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      I'm not sure 19 is too high for Rodriguez anymore.  He looks to be moving up boards, but it could be smokescreens.  
    • MHS831
      Panthers WR Xavier Legette named potential trade candidate for 2026 offseason

      By MHS831 · Posted

      I see XL this way---great athlete.  Good person.  When we drafted him, we knew he was raw.  One year of WR in college (starting) and in HS, he was a QB, I believe. We knew we would need patience with him.  I think year 3 will be make or break.  He is older, and I think that people with his athletic ability have always been better than those with less---but those with less can become more successful.  Why is that?  in my view, it is mental. XL can learn the mechanics and nuances of playing WR if he becomes focused on it and works at it.  I had the opportunity to talk to Armanti Edwards one day after OTAs (great guy) and he discussed how overwhelming it was.  He seemed shocked.  At that time, I knew that Fox hated the pick (I heard him mock Armanti to another coach when he saw Edwards drop a punt from a jugs machine--then I saw Armanti look back at Fox as if to suggest that he was feeling the pressure to please the coach. We forget that these are kids in their early 20s.  At the time, Fox was a lame duck.  Remember when he had Clausen as the #3 QB and was forced to move him up the ladder?  I liked Fox, but I think the climate and culture was influenced by the politics.  Currently, I see another Wr from SC who is struggling, but he is ina  very nurturing, positive culture. Let's see what happens with XL.  I am frustrated too---but XL was a second round talent who was raw and we traded up to get him.  He had 500 yards as a rookie--lets call 2025 a sophomore slump and see if we can't get at least 50 yards per game out of him.  If not, cut bait.
    • rebelrouser
      Schrader / Jeremiah mock draft experiment

      By rebelrouser · Posted

      Sadiq feels like a lazy comp.  Sure he would be a big improvement over what we have but at a position we don't and maybe can't (midget qb) utilize.  I hope the staff puts together a list of players you automatically take at 19 (Freeling, Lemon, Downs, Faulk) and if none are there, trade back to look at (Thieneman, McNeil-Warren, Proctor, Lomu, Allen, Iheanachor, Banks, Woods).  I get the people that think an OT would be a waste because we temporarily patched that hole, and ILB and safety are a waste because that is high to take those particular positions, but by trading back we get extra picks to fill every need.  A draft that has an OT, S, ILB, slot WR, and C would really put us in a good position moving forward if we get an extra first three rounds additional pick.   
×
×
  • Create New...