Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

QB market : Eagles pick up Foles options


trueblade

Recommended Posts

Even if Cam wont be ready to go for a few weeks to start the season, I would absolutely fuging hate to waste cap on a QB. 

As per usual, we don't have that much space and we have gaping holes all over the Dline, Oline, limited DB depth (also per usual). 

A lot of things are pointing at 2019 being a sort of rebuilding year , even if Hurney strikes gold on the first 2 or 3 draft picks again. 

I think its way smarter to trot Allen or Heineke out there or draft a late round QB so we dont have to waste money and we can use our limited cap towards rebuilding both sides of the line. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sheil Kapadia of The Athletic believes the Eagles are "bluffing" and will not assign the franchise tag to Nick Foles unless they already have a trade partner in place.

The Eagles have made clear that Carson Wentz is their starter, so it wouldn't make much sense to assign Foles the franchise tag, which would net him close to $25 million. No team in their right mind would pay that amount for a backup quarterback. The Eagles are clearly posturing to drum up trade interest, though Kapadia suspects the odds of Foles being dealt are still "pretty slim." In all likelihood, the reigning Super Bowl MVP will hit the open market.
 
 
Source: The Athletic
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Foles was never an option here anyway.  Best case, is Foles actually going to a QB needy team, and pushing an unsigned vet like Fitzmagic or Tyrod to us should Cam not be ready to start the year.  Maybe another early BYE, let Fitz start the first 4-5 games, Cam comes back.

That said, I don't see any way Cam doesn't start the season the way reports have sounded, and just Cam's reluctance to ever miss any time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...