Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jags release Tashaun Gipson


TheCasillas

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

Did Reid not just set the safety market value? 

 

A defense needs a rangy FS while the SS takes the tight end out of the game. What answer are you looking for?

Read? Had Had Had. No one HAD set it yet. As it was plain to see I was speaking of before Reid signed. My whole point and problem is we set the market value. 

 And when’s the last time we had a “rangy” Safety? 2013? Since he wins with box Safeties why would he change now? You say we need a rangy safety. I agree. I just think it’s because of who we have at SS.

Adrian Amos/Tre Boston would be perfect as interchangeable Safeties. Both can cover and tackle. Not one limited in one phase of the game. Neither would be considered rangy. And we wouldn’t have LB in single high coverage. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Black&BlueBubba said:

Damn.  With all these safeties hitting the market did we jump too soon on Reid?  And overpay??

We got in a bidding war with ourselves... every other owner was too racist to sign him. Could’ve signed him 3 years 12m. Instead we paid a guy 3/21 when there’s a loaded S class. And to those saying no SS. Ever heard of Landon Collins? 

But at the end of the day I’d rather slightly over pay for Reid and still have him. Should be above average this year with an offseason under his belt. (Anyone saying he was above average last year is a moron). Torrey Smith on the other hand... 5m bc hes a nice guy. Franchise is just handing out money for free left and right 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People are forgetting no one wanted Eric Reid anyways. That means we could have offered a below market offer and it would probably have been the only offer he’d have gotten, but tepper doesn’t do business like that. He wanted to give Reid a fair offer and so he did. I think Reid was a great signing. No regrets here. This Tepper era is like a breath of fresh air. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Chosen Newton said:

People are forgetting no one wanted Eric Reid anyways. That means we could have offered a below market offer and it would probably have been the only offer he’d have gotten, but tepper doesn’t do business like that. He wanted to give Reid a fair offer and so he did. I think Reid was a great signing. No regrets here. This Tepper era is like a breath of fresh air. 

He certainly would have received offers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Chosen Newton said:

People are forgetting no one wanted Eric Reid anyways. That means we could have offered a below market offer and it would probably have been the only offer he’d have gotten, but tepper doesn’t do business like that. He wanted to give Reid a fair offer and so he did. I think Reid was a great signing. No regrets here. This Tepper era is like a breath of fresh air. 

Breath of fresh air? From a football perspective, the Tepper era thus far smells like the same old stale fart. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Moo Daeng said:

He certainly would have received offers. 

I disagree. I mean everyone knew Reid could ball when he was released from the 49ers, yet they didn’t sign him prioritizing his off field politics rather than on field playmaking ability, so what makes you think he would have been sought after now? Maybe after he dropped his case, but even then, a lot of these owners and fan bases still don’t like him, which is why he was left unsigned so long. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Panthers8969 said:

Also can someone give me some stuff on TG? That’s why I originally clicked this topic. Should’ve known it’d just be 2 pages of Eric Reid 

After his first contract with the browns he got a huge pay day with the jags. He was a top 5 safety with the browns. He has experienced some injuries over the last two seasons, but still a strong performer. The jags cut him bc it was an easy decision to make, they immediately get back  6 mil. Jags were in win now mode - so they threw a lot of cash at players and now they are in "get back to winning" mode. So that calls for money to pay a big deal QB likes foles. So yesterday they cut some weight. TG being one of them. I think we should bring him in @ weddle money

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Breath of fresh air? From a football perspective, the Tepper era thus far smells like the same old stale fart. 

Tepper is still a rookie, this is his first free agency, lets wait and see if we're on the same merry go round.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we can get another safety like Gipson for a decent deal (2-3 mil a year), I think we should do it and it takes one more draft pick we don't have to reach for. If a great FS falls in the 2nd or 3rd, sure jump on it, but don't reach. The fact that the market will have many FS's looking for jobs is good for us. Locking Reid up was a real good move. We didn't break the bank and over pay and yeah maybe we could have got it a few dollars cheaper, but it's still not a bad deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, musicman said:

If we can get another safety like Gipson for a decent deal (2-3 mil a year), I think we should do it and it takes one more draft pick we don't have to reach for. If a great FS falls in the 2nd or 3rd, sure jump on it, but don't reach. The fact that the market will have many FS's looking for jobs is good for us. Locking Reid up was a real good move. We didn't break the bank and over pay and yeah maybe we could have got it a few dollars cheaper, but it's still not a bad deal.

Agreed.  One thing Gettleman always said that I agreed with, BUT he never came close to doing until the offseason he was fired, was "Sign your needs in FA, so when you draft, it's BPA."  

I really feel we have the chance to do something special this offseason in that regard.  The market is shaking up nicely for everything except pass rushers...  but, if we could come out of FA with something like Barr, Paradis, Gipson, and help at tackle and on the edge, I would be absolutely ecstatic.  Only thing is...  I have a feeling the only place we'll get the edge rushing help will be the draft because FA hasn't even started and the second-tier rushers are already priority.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Moo Daeng said:

He certainly would have received offers. 

Just like he’s did a season ago? Oh wait... he wasn’t signed until the season started. Reid played well in SF and went unsigned bc of his protesting. If owners had a problem with that then, why would they not still have a problem with it a year later? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Proudiddy said:

Agreed.  One thing Gettleman always said that I agreed with, BUT he never came close to doing until the offseason he was fired, was "Sign your needs in FA, so when you draft, it's BPA."  

I really feel we have the chance to do something special this offseason in that regard.  The market is shaking up nicely for everything except pass rushers...  but, if we could come out of FA with something like Barr, Paradis, Gipson, and help at tackle and on the edge, I would be absolutely ecstatic.  Only thing is...  I have a feeling the only place we'll get the edge rushing help will be the draft because FA hasn't even started and the second-tier rushers are already priority.

Yeah that’s how we ended up with Matt Kalil. Not a realistic strategy to think you can solve all needs in FA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Panthers8969 said:

Yeah that’s how we ended up with Matt Kalil. Not a realistic strategy to think you can solve all needs in FA

No you can't, but Kalil wasn't due to addressing a need.  They WANTED to sign Ryan's brother.  Bad talent evaluation or loyalty to a tenured player ruined that one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean, this year we should've easily been a playoff team in my opinion. We should have easily had two or three more wins--at least one--had not Bryce crapped the bed. But let's be serious about human nature and what we know about our FO. I wouldn't bet the farm that Bryce will be anything but the defacto starter in 2026, because (inconsistent though it was) we have exceeded expectations this year, and some in the FO probably believe, rightly or wrongly, that Bryce is at the center of that. You know, piece of bread seems like a meal if all you've had is a cracker. That being said, Bryce has shown plenty of inconsistency if not a downright pattern of flaws. He's a third year QB, and some, if not most, of his metrics aren't pretty. It could be argued that he should be further along (for me it's not really arguable). So, hopefully the decision makers will acquire a couple of plan Bs. I would hate it and love it if we identified "our guy" in the draft, and that it was somehow achievable to acquire him with a couple of high draft picks or even less. But we already pulled the trigger on Bryce with arguably awful results, so that's got to make the decision makers a little skittish to repeat a mistake that should be still fresh on everyone's mind. That being said, I think that it's more likely that we acquire a player like Mac Jones, Malik Willis or Trey Lance in free agency, and also target a day two or day three developmental pick in the draft with some real upside. That pick for would be Drew Allar who should slide to day three (I'm thinking). I think that this is more realistic than them releasing Bryce from his starter's role from the get-go, or someone just flat out playing themselves definitely into the starter's role by the time the season begins.  Now, again, if we can find "our guy" that changes the narrative and is expected to be the starter from day one, I'd be excited, if not downright ecstatic, but I don't think that's a realistic expectation.  Getting back to the team in general, If we don't make some improvements, including QB, I wouldn't bet that we'd necessarily be a playoff team next year, because, the rest of the NFCS is likely to improve next year. I don't expect that teams in our division will be necessarily able to "backdoor" themselves into the playoffs next season. So we're going to have to hit on at least a couple of picks, get healthy along the line, and fundamentally change the way we're calling plays because lightning probably isn't striking twice. I'm hoping that we'll have a real breakthrough season by 2028, because this season and next season aren't likely to be it because removing ball-and-chains ain't easy unless you got the key, and It's still gonna take some time to find it.
    • Necas is not the missing piece here.
×
×
  • Create New...