Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Seahawks consider trading Frank Clark


Raleigh PF

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Sub Zero said:

They want a 1st I promise you.. They lost Earl with no compensation because they wouldn't come off their high demands..

Wouldn’t demanding a 1st when a team offers a 2nd be the same thing all over again?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Reebis21 said:

Wouldn’t demanding a 1st when a team offers a 2nd be the same thing all over again?

Yep and they are stubborn enough to play him on the tag this year and lose him for nothing next year because they didn't get the value they wanted for him..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Reebis21 said:

I think this is a two part question...after trading for him, what kind of contract r u willing to offer? 

He is a 25 year old coming off 2 season in a row of double digit sacks.  He is looking for DeMarcus Lawrence money.. If you're not willing to pay 22 to 24 mill a year on a 5 year deal forget about it...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hawks are selling the farm. Remember, their ownership at the crossroads because of the death of Paul Allen. I don't believe they will pay Wilson or Wagner. 

John/Pete seems to have a system in place, where he can just let veterans walk and rebuild. 

Honestly, teams have a small window to win, else their "stars" start asking for the moon, because they believe they are the next coming of you know who...

What will the Panthers do, when Cam asks for $40m / year? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, JoePanther said:

Hawks are selling the farm. Remember, their ownership at the crossroads because of the death of Paul Allen. I don't believe they will pay Wilson or Wagner. 

John/Pete seems to have a system in place, where he can just let veterans walk and rebuild. 

Honestly, teams have a small window to win, else their "stars" start asking for the moon, because they believe they are the next coming of you know who...

What will the Panthers do, when Cam asks for $40m / year? 

pay him $40m

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Most teams OLs are dealing with injuries at the end of the season. So by that token all QB play should be horrific across the board, but it's not.  Using the OL as an excuse anytime a QB plays bad is just lazy.  This is the same OL when Bryce had his good games not so long ago.  So do they suck just when Bryce does bad? Obviously they played well enough when y'all were doing your victory laps and saying 'you told us Bryce was the man' in the victories. It goes back to my stance with Bryce all along...he's a low end starting QB.  He'd be a great backup. Bryce is going to have a few really nice games a season at this point in his career, with a few WTF games mixed in, but very middling overall.
    • Good Lord! I bet the O-line play wasn't the worst since 1980.  And @thebdawg, injuries absolutely can make for a bad showing at the end of the day. That's not an excuse, it's just a fact.
    • Defense stepped up after that and held them to a FG. Offense proceeded to turn it over on downs right after.  Was it an incredibly dumb penalty, of course it was. The defense played their asses off though and got zero help from the offense. If you force them to punt at that point instead of the penalty do you really think the offense does anything differently?
×
×
  • Create New...