Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tyreek Hill's son removed from home


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, L-TownCat said:

CPS doesn't just cruise around looking for kids to snatch.

It is determined by several agencies; DSS, CPS, LEO, and magistrates or judges would have had to issue warrants and emergency custody or child removal papers. (months possibly years of investigations)

I may not be able to say "whodunit" but the fact that it WAS done is evident without trial.  Its common sense. 

 

So, if you are sooo bad at caring for your own child that the gov says "Damnit, give it here" you suck as a human.  

Thats not an insult its really just biology.  A human that won't see to the survival of its young as its supposed to is defective.

 

But he's fast! Automatic pass, KC should have already released him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, PootieNunu said:

But he's fast! Automatic pass, KC should have already released him

I get the snark, but its bigger than that.  

Its not about the Chiefs and their star, its about the League.  The league does not want to deal with losing commodities.

Hill moves the needle so he gets special treatment.  

UDFA with same story gets cut and the league buries the story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, L-TownCat said:

I get the snark, but its bigger than that.  

Its not about the Chiefs and their star, its about the League.  The league does not want to deal with losing commodities.

Hill moves the needle so he gets special treatment.  

UDFA with same story gets cut and the league buries the story.

If he plays one snap this season I will be pissed, hope someone tries to break him on the field, and i never wish injury on someone but this trash has it coming. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PootieNunu said:

A child is not removed from the home for no reason, this is the same child the girlfriend was pregnant with when he choked her and punched her in the stomach.

I can tell you that this is undeniably false.

I had a co-worker who's first born was hurt while being watched by their sister-in-law. Due to the nature of the injury, DSS was involved and the child removed from their home despite them being out of the country at the time of the incident.

It took nearly nearly a year along with a pitbull attorney to get DSS to return the child (fortunately, they were being cared for by another relative that lives nearby). I'll never forget how much that incident took on my co-worker mentally and physically. He literally aged years in less than one.

 

Not saying that this is the case with Hill, but to assume that DSS wouldn't insert themselves into others' lives without being completely justified is incorrect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, GeorgiaBoyz said:

Innocent until proven guilty ? 

Or 

Guilty until proven innonvent ? 

What did he do for you to be convincting him already ?

Yes he’s completely innocent, nothing was going on and they just came ripped his child from his house because they’re haters on a vendetta rampage. His history of law issues are all just asinine false reports and part of a mastermind conspiracy.

 

These things are not things that just happen to normal, everyday people. You have a better chance of being hit by lightning multiple times than having all this poo going on in you’re life and being completely innocent.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know this is way beneath what we're talking about here, but the thought crossed my mind. Fantasy football is going to be nuts this year. No Gronk, Olsen is an injury risk, Hunt is suspended for eight games, Hill may be banned from playing (he should be), Cam may not be a first-round draft pick if his shoulder isn't healing well, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Icege said:

I can tell you that this is undeniably false.

I had a co-worker who's first born was hurt while being watched by their sister-in-law. Due to the nature of the injury, DSS was involved and the child removed from their home despite them being out of the country at the time of the incident.

It took nearly nearly a year along with a pitbull attorney to get DSS to return the child (fortunately, they were being cared for by another relative that lives nearby). I'll never forget how much that incident took on my co-worker mentally and physically. He literally aged years in less than one.

 

Not saying that this is the case with Hill, but to assume that DSS wouldn't insert themselves into others' lives without being completely justified is incorrect.

I don’t you know the full details, sounds to me you probably got a biased viewpoint from a ‘co-worker’. He probably was stressed due to the realization of his mistakes. It’s the parents responsibility to look after the care of their child. Not their ‘sister-in-law’. If the parents have that poor of judgment to allow a child to be watched by inadequate individuals, it’s on them. DSS looks at the situation not narrowing down blame. Obviously adults were making bad decisions in regard to the care of their child. Had DSS not stepped in a the child was hurt again by poor judgment everyone would blame DSS.

It is about the child, not the parents and when it comes to children I’d rather them be more strict, more cautious then not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Seems like these off field issues guys are starting to catch up to KC. First Kareem Hunt, now Tyreek Hill. Both looked like fantastic gambles for awhile.

There are two groups of people I know of that have a major thing for "bad boys". Number one, teenage girls. Number two, certain Panther fans.

We've got some folks on here who regularly lobby for us to go after guys that get released from their previous teams for character issues, even major ones. But stuff like this is why you avoid those kinds of risks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Arroz con Panther said:

I know this is way beneath what we're talking about here, but the thought crossed my mind. Fantasy football is going to be nuts this year. No Gronk, Olsen is an injury risk, Hunt is suspended for eight games, Hill may be banned from playing (he should be), Cam may not be a first-round draft pick if his shoulder isn't healing well, etc.

This is what is ruining football. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...