Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A little info on Jonah Williams


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

19 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

If he made it to 16, how would you feel about putting him at right tackle with Taylor Moton on the left?

Not sure. Personally I would prefer Moton staying @ RT esp with the uncertainty of Daryl Williams (still can't believe we brought him back but I digress). I think Moton will excel at RT and if J Williams fell into our lap, it would make for solid bookends on the OL for years to come.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why are so many people afraid to play Moton at LT because they think he'll excel at RT? Here's the reality, RT is the easier position to play. Most LTs would likely look even better if they were playing RT. RT is for OTs who can't play LT (or the rare scenario where a team has two capable LTs but someone needs to play RT). Gross would've probably been a HOF RT, but instead he was a really good but not quite elite LT because a really good but not quite elite LT is still more valuable than a HOF RT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Why are so many people afraid to play Moton at LT because they think he'll excel at RT? Here's the reality, RT is the easier position to play. Most LTs would likely look even better if they were playing RT. RT is for OTs who can't play LT (or the rare scenario where a team has two capable LTs but someone needs to play RT). Gross would've probably been a HOF RT, but instead he was a really good but not quite elite LT because a really good but not quite elite LT is still more valuable than a HOF RT.

I'm really only concerned about that one guy who seems to be afraid of playing Moton at LT.

I'm blanking on his name. Ron something...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Why are so many people afraid to play Moton at LT because they think he'll excel at RT? Here's the reality, RT is the easier position to play. Most LTs would likely look even better if they were playing RT. RT is for OTs who can't play LT (or the rare scenario where a team has two capable LTs but someone needs to play RT). Gross would've probably been a HOF RT, but instead he was a really good but not quite elite LT because a really good but not quite elite LT is still more valuable than a HOF RT.

You make some good points LG. I guess we've been subpar protecting Cam for so long that I just want to see the best players at each position. Moton did a decent job @ LT during the preseason last year and perhaps he'll excel there after an offseason of preparation. But if we can get a bonafide LT in this draft (especially if there's a run on edge rushers before #16), we should jump at the opportunity. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'm really only concerned about that one guy who seems to be afraid of playing Moton at LT.

I'm blanking on his name. Ron something...

I've become so accustomed to watching us make bafflingly terrible OL depth chart decisions under Ron that I've simply come to expect it at this point. It seems as if we always find a way to NOT play our five best OL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Prowler2k18 said:

You make some good points LG. I guess we've been subpar protecting Cam for so long that I just want to see the best players at each position. Moton did a decent job @ LT during the preseason last year and perhaps he'll excel there after an offseason of preparation. But if we can get a bonafide LT in this draft (especially if there's a run on edge rushers before #16), we should jump at the opportunity. 

I just very seriously doubt that there's an OT available in this draft who would be a better LT than Moton as a rookie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only kid id consider at OT if Burns or Sweat are still on the board as well

 

 

People forget.  He was consensus the top OL in this draft and people had him going top 5 overall going into the National championship game.  He had a solid game vs Clemson but had 1-2 big bad plays vs Ferrell.  Then the questions magically arose that he is better suited at OG "because he isnt long enough".  Then he goes out and out measures Dillard.

 

Williams has played in NFL style offenses, played in 3 point stances etc............Unlike Dillard who played in a gimmick offense where you lineup wide spreading out with the QB throwing short pass only requiring guys to slide and mirror for a short period

 

Williams has run blocked in one of the best rushing attacks in college.    Unlike Dillard who played in a offense that ran the ball 1-2 times a game.

 

Williams played against the best of the best competition.  Dillards best competition he faced was about as good as Williams worst.

 

Williams gave up 2 bad plays in a national championship and people dinged him for it.   To one of the best edge rusher in this class, rd 1 guy who people say we may consider at 16.  While Dillard got bullied by day 2-3 guys in a Senior bowl, and people come up with excuses "well its just a all-star game" (yet those same people love to raise the stocks like Moton after a dominant Senior bowl wek and those just a all-star game excuses arent used there)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The only thing I know is nfl red zone. 
    • We put a ton of high draft capital into young WRs over the past few years. We drafted a WR in top 2 rounds of the draft in 4 out of the past 5 years. At some point, we need to rely on the dudes we drafted vs relying on veteran role players. That's the only way we're going to evolve as a team and take the next step to going back to winning again.  Remember when Cam lost KB and everyone thought it was the end of the universe? And 2015 happened.  Maybe losing Theilen and Coker will open some opportunities for some other guys to step up. 
    • So apparently in the time between the end of the last football season, and now, a TON of streaming sites have been taken down. From what I remember most of these idiotic offiicial streaming services that offer NFL games don't ever offer ALL of the games. I remember subscribing to one service on youtube last season that cost hundreds of dollars and it would still constantly tell me games were either blacked out or unavailable, which is totally ridiculous. Is there any one service that I can watch ALL of the games on?? It gets on my everlasting nerves already that there's so many different streaming sites and they are all expensive as hell. I don't want to take out an entire additional car payment to subscribe to 4 different streaming services to watch all the games. Is there just ONE I can subscribe to? The most comprehensive thing I have access to now is Sirius XM. It's only 10 ish bucks a month and I can listen to the home or away broadcasts of any game. Only thing is I can't WATCH the games but this seriously comes in handy if I'm out doing something, driving, or can't stay still at the moment to watch the games. But usually I'm off on Sundays, so I mostly want to watch them. 
×
×
  • Create New...