Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Message board Scouts let's see what you got.


Sub Zero

Recommended Posts

Just a quick skills check.. After watching this all defensive snaps look at Brian Burns .. What are your observations.. Give atleast 5 no more than 10..

Example : Offensive Philosophy for the offense..

Stats for Burns..

Defensive alignments..

Stuff like that and more..

Get them boys!! Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only needed to watch two minutes to see the following:

1) Has a ridiculously quick first step

2) He sets and holds the edge well in the run game and is disciplined.  Most of our young DEs we've had before (Delaire, Hall, Ealy, etc) struggle keeping playing time because they are not disciplined and do not set the edge (it's not all about just getting after the passer).

3) He's been asked to drop into coverage

4) He takes plays off when he's tired (definitely coachable)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, X-Clown on 1 said:

Only needed to watch two minutes to see the following:

1) Has a ridiculous quick first step

2) He sets and holds the edge well in the run game and is disciplined.  Most of our young DEs we've had before (Delaire, Hall, Ealy, etc) struggle keeping playing time because of they are not disciplined and do not set the edge (it's not all about just getting after the passer).

3) He's been asked to drop into coverage

4) He takes plays off when he's tired (definitely coachable)

This...ppl

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Michaelinraleigh said:

I watched the first 1:50

As I've been saying bad pad level and definitely bad hands. Doesn't deliver a consistent good punch nor does he maintain separation and work his leavers as he moves flat down the line of scrimmage. 

I'll break down more later.

I can't wait..lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A few observations..

1. All the worry about his size.. BC didn't run to many plays his way.. He didn't get pushed back alot held his ground pretty well...They double teamed him 50% of the time.. They chipped him repeatedly with a RB or TE.. And paid for it when they left there OT on a island..

2. I like how he was able to move around.  Rush from either side.  Lined up in the middle and dropped in coverage (got beat a few times 1 on 1) .. He has alot of versatility..

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm no scout but I'll tell you what I see; both the good and the bad.

  • As mentioned above, his pad level is not great at all which can be hard on a taller lankier guy.
  • Has to use his hands better when getting off blocks.
  • Has to continue to build up his frame. There's times where he's being pushed around by bigger OT's
  • If he's going to really be an OLB and not just a pass rushing DE then his coverage has to improve
  • I think his effort isn't always there. Hard to tell from film.
  • Definitely has a fast first step
  • He is very disciplined when it comes to containment and forcing runs inside. That won't help him get on the stat sheet much but it is what you typically ask your ends to do.
  • Needs more power to finish his tackles.
  • Seems to get lost in the muck sometimes but being a step back from the LOS might help him.
  • Frankly he isn't as disruptive as I'd like for a first round pick to be and he's going to be a project. Hope I'm wrong, and I do believe he'll develop with better coaching and size, but I don't see him pushing for ROTY.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gets shoved around by bigger tackles

hands aren’t the greatest

looks to rely on pure athleticism at times

coverage skills are slightly above average

 

Hes going to be a project starting out. Ron said as much when asked if he would be starting day one...

“Brian will be part of the rotation”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, mc52beast said:

Hes going to be a project starting out. Ron said as much when asked if he would be starting day one...

“Brian will be part of the rotation”

Thats a 1st rounder folks.

A good rotational fit.  Everything a team wants in a first rounder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, mc52beast said:

Gets shoved around by bigger tackles

hands aren’t the greatest

looks to rely on pure athleticism at times

coverage skills are slightly above average

 

Hes going to be a project starting out. Ron said as much when asked if he would be starting day one...

“Brian will be part of the rotation”

Didn't see none of that 1st observations at all.. Do you have a time stamp?? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The referee assigned to this game is Shawn Smith. This is a critical data point for betting purposes because his crew has one of the most distinct, long-term statistical biases in the NFL. "Road Team" Bias: Historically, Shawn Smith is known as the "Road Team Referee." In a league where home teams usually win ~55% of the time, home teams in Smith's games have historically won at a rate far below league average (often hovering around 40-42%). Against The Spread (ATS): The trend is even starker here. Home teams have covered the spread at a rate of roughly 37-40% in his career. The Mechanism: Analysis shows his crew tends to call a higher rate of False Start and Unnecessary Roughness penalties on the Home Team. This negates the traditional home-field advantage (crowd noise causing false starts for the visitors). Impact on This Game: This specific assignment heavily favors the Buccaneers (Road Team). If you believe the referee influences the game, Smith's presence suggests the Panthers will struggle to get "home cooking" calls and may face untimely procedural flags that stall drives. The Panthers have only had Shawn Smith officiate four home games since he became a head referee in 2018, and they are all losses. Date Opponent Result Score Nov 24, 2024 vs. Kansas City Chiefs Loss 27–30 Oct 9, 2022 vs. San Francisco 49ers Loss 15–37 Dec 12, 2021 vs. Atlanta Falcons Loss 21–29 Nov 25, 2018 vs. Seattle Seahawks Loss 27–30 Considering the how rare it is for Shawn Smith to officiate a Panthers game at all, this seems like an odd time to assign him to a Panthers game, unless the NFL wants to kill the Panthers season once and for all.  The Panthers' offensive line situation creates a "perfect storm" for referee Shawn Smith's specific tendency to call False Starts on the home team. The "Carousel" Factor (Communication Vulnerability) The most damning stat for the Panthers' offensive line in 2025 is their lack of continuity. The Stat: By Week 13, the Panthers had already fielded their 10th different offensive line combination. The Impact: False starts are often "communication penalties"—they happen when a guard doesn't hear the center's snap count or a tackle anticipates the wrong cadence. A unit that hasn't played together struggles with non-verbal communication. The Shawn Smith Multiplier: Shawn Smith’s crew calls False Starts at a high rate on home teams. He will likely look for flinches on the exterior of the line. A disjointed line that is constantly rotating players (due to the injuries of starters like Cade Mays and the illness issues with Robert Hunt earlier this season) is "fresh meat" for this specific referee bias. The Specific Culprits (2025 Penalties) Ikem Ekwonu (LT): Leads the team with 4 False Start penalties this season. He is the most frequent violator on the line. Taylor Moton (RT): Has been flagged for 3 False Starts. The Trap: Smith’s crew often focuses on the tackles (the players furthest from the ball) jumping early to get an edge on speed rushers. Since Ekwonu struggles with this discipline naturally, having a referee who hunts for it is a massive disadvantage. The "Managed Outcome" Synthesis The "Bucs Cover" Script: If the desired outcome is a Buccaneers win to solidify their playoff standing, the officials simply have to apply the letter of the law. Calling strict False Starts on a confused, banged-up Panthers O-line will consistently put them in "3rd and Long" situations, killing their drives and allowing the Bucs (-3.5) to cover easily. The "Close Game" Script: If the desired outcome is "Week 18 Drama" (keeping the division tied), look for the officials to ignore the Panthers' twitchy tackles. If Ekwonu jumps a split-second early and no flag is thrown, it effectively neutralizes the Bucs' pass rush, allowing the Panthers to keep the score close. Summary of the Edge Vulnerability: Extreme. The Panthers are playing backup interior linemen (like Jake Curhan or practice squad call-ups) next to jumpy tackles. Betting Implication: This strongly reinforces the Bucs -3 or -3.5 play. The combination of a "Road Team Referee" and a "Home Team O-Line in chaos" suggests the Panthers will beat themselves with procedural penalties. Based on the collision of the hard data (Referee bias + Offensive Line injuries) and the soft narratives ("Managed Outcomes"), here is the definitive recommendation. If you have to place a single Moneyline bet to win this game straight up: The Pick: Tampa Bay Buccaneers (-165) While the "Entertainment Script" hints at a Panthers upset to keep the division messy, the structural disadvantage the Panthers face in this specific matchup is too massive to ignore. Here is why the Buccaneers are the stong moneyline play: 1. The "Shawn Smith" Road-Field Advantage This is the decisive factor. In the NFL, Home Field Advantage usually accounts for about 1.5 to 2 points of value. The Reality: Referee Shawn Smith negates that advantage entirely. His crew calls penalties in a way that historically suppresses home crowd momentum (False Starts, holding). The Result: You are essentially getting the Buccaneers on a neutral field (or even a "pseudo-home" field) against a team with a worse roster. 2. The "Drive-Killer" Synergy To win as an underdog, the Panthers need to play a clean, mistake-free game to keep drives alive. The combination of Panthers' 10th O-Line combo + Jump-prone Tackles (Ekwonu) + A Referee who hunts False Starts is a recipe for disaster. The Scenario: Expect the Panthers to face multiple "1st and 15" or "3rd and 12" situations due to procedural flags. These drive-killers will force them to punt or settle for field goals, while the Bucs' offense (led by Mayfield) stays on schedule. 3. The "TV Product" Counter-Argument You asked about the "Managed Outcome." While a Panthers win creates "chaos," the NFL also values Star Power in the playoffs. Baker Mayfield and the Buccaneers are a proven national TV draw with recent playoff history. If the league has to choose between "Chaos" (Panthers) and "Ratings/Legitimacy" (Bucs), the "Script" likely leans toward ensuring the Buccaneers—the more marketable team—secure the division lead. They won't "fix" the game against the Panthers, but they won't intervene to save them from their own penalties. Final Verdict Betting on the Panthers requires you to hope for a miracle 4th-quarter collapse. Betting on the Buccaneers requires you to trust that a superior roster—aided by a favorable officiating crew—will control the game for the first 45 minutes. Take the Buccaneers Moneyline. The "Safe" money is on the Ref. The Prediction: Tampa Bay Buccaneers Win and Cover Projected Score: Buccaneers 27, Panthers 17 The Bet: Buccaneers -3 (or Moneyline -165) Confidence Level: High on the Winner; Moderate on the Spread (due to potential "garbage time" variance).
    • He isn't a good HC. I think he has proved that conclusively.
    • The missed tackle percentage is on that screen cap.
×
×
  • Create New...