UFA thread

[Paintballr]

13 hours ago, JARROD said:

Tepper,...

well now we see the Tepper influence.

the Honeymoon is over.

yuck

Lol what?

[bobcat91]

I complained about guys we drafted but I'm not getting worked up about UDFA. There's a reason they weren't drafted.

[JARROD]

22 minutes ago, Paintballr said:

Lol what?

As far as the draft and direction. 

[JARROD]

36 minutes ago, Toomers said:

  That’s the uninformed masses that you’re a part of. 

 I’ve screamed for months that the LTs sucked in this draft. So why would I not complain when we waste 2 quality picks on a lazy one. 

 Then compound it by wasting another pick on a backup QB we hope never plays. 

Who are our 3-4 DEs, FS, NCB. 

 Then a ton of talent falls to the 5th and we take a JAG RB. With Mack and Omenihu still there. 

And Hurney typically being too lazy to bring in some quality UDFAs. 

I can’t believe this, but I find myself totally agreeing with you lately.

im going to try to take the calm reserved road from here in and hope Hurney and the coaches have a much better feeling about Little than we do. 

I’m probably the most ok with Miller, hoping he’s a Hightower, then Godwin maybe, then I’m warming up to Burns the best way I can, hope the scouts see he can play much stronger than I saw.

the quarterback and running back are both totally wasted picks for me. CMac is like our Marshall Faulk so if we truly wanted a guy to do similar things to split carries then this draft pick is going to have to do a lot to dispel what he looks like. 

Grier,... I’m still like what the hell. Belicheck skipped him, could have drafted him before us and they have picks to waste— went with Stidham— we could have at least waited and took him a round later.

im not going full sour grapes but this will take a bit to warm up to, if ever.

[Carl Spackler]

1 hour ago, stbugs said:

Lol. Aw, did someone cry a little when I said Hurney ignored UDFAs? You had to login as your  alias @Cavscout and poo my post and pie yours. Damn, that’s sad. Also, great response to my post.

I don’t have an alias and never have. I joined this board in 2009. Not surprised you don’t know how to handle multiple people disagreeing with your stupidity, though. 

[Carl Spackler]

1 hour ago, Toomers said:

  That’s the uninformed masses that you’re a part of. 

 I’ve screamed for months that the LTs sucked in this draft. So why would I not complain when we waste 2 quality picks on a lazy one. 

 Then compound it by wasting another pick on a backup QB we hope never plays. 

Who are our 3-4 DEs, FS, NCB. 

 Then a ton of talent falls to the 5th and we take a JAG RB. With Mack and Omenihu still there. 

And Hurney typically being too lazy to bring in some quality UDFAs. 

We used our first pick on a 3-4 DE, dumbass. 

[Toomers]

3 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

We used our first pick on a 3-4 DE, dumbass. 

No we used it on a 3-4 OLB dipshit. 

  3-4 DEs are a completely different position. But I wouldn’t expect either one of your alts to know that. 

[Carl Spackler]

Just now, Toomers said:

No we used it on a 3-4 OLB dipshit. 

  3-4 DEs are a completely different position. But I would expect either one of your alts to know that. 

I don’t have an alt, you fuging mongoloid idiot. Check the IPs for all I care. I can’t believe you’re so stupid that you think multiple people disagreeing with your bullshit means they have to be the same person. Miss me with this trash. 

[Carl Spackler]

LOL Stbugs and toomers both argued with me, I guess that means they’s the same person

[Toomers]

1 minute ago, Carl Spackler said:

I don’t have an alt, you fuging mongoloid idiot. Check the IPs for all I care. I can’t believe you’re so stupid that you think multiple people disagreeing with your bullshit means they have to be the same person. Miss me with this trash. 

You’re the only one disagreeing with me. Some other entity is pushing pie buttons, and must be scared to actually say why he disagrees. But I’m sure it’s just coincidence. 

  

[Toomers]

4 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

LOL Stbugs and toomers both argued with me, I guess that means they’s the same person

Just sign in to the other account and prove us wrong. 

 And maybe you can teach us about DEs since no one knows but you.

[Carl Spackler]

12 minutes ago, Toomers said:

You’re the only one disagreeing with me. Some other entity is pushing pie buttons, and must be scared to actually say why he disagrees. But I’m sure it’s just coincidence. 

  

I mean I guess, I’m not some 51-year-old dude and after just looking at the guy’s profile, I don’t even agree with half of what he says.

So I’ll leave it up to you: what’s more likely, two people disagree with you, or one person created an account 11 years ago with the intent of finally outing himself as an alt today? Additionally, how could my alt be older than my actual account? I discovered the Huddle in 2009 and joined then. I’ve heard a lot of poo in that decade, but never that I have an alt because someone else dislikes your poo. I rarely react to posts anyway. 

[MasterAwesome]

36 minutes ago, Toomers said:

You’re the only one disagreeing with me. Some other entity is pushing pie buttons, and must be scared to actually say why he disagrees. But I’m sure it’s just coincidence. 

  

That’s why you think it’s an alt account? Cause you’re getting pooped from the shadows? That’s literally what 99% of people who use the poop feature do...it’s for cowards who don’t have confidence enough in their arguments to articulate why they disagree with a post. They just want you to know they got triggered but they can’t actually rationalize their feelings.

[LinvilleGorge]

51 minutes ago, MasterAwesome said:

That’s why you think it’s an alt account? Cause you’re getting pooped from the shadows? That’s literally what 99% of people who use the poop feature do...it’s for cowards who don’t have confidence enough in their arguments to articulate why they disagree with a post. They just want you to know they got triggered but they can’t actually rationalize their feelings.

Perfectly stated.