Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A sneak peek at our Hybrid defense.


Recommended Posts

So the recent theory is we are going full 3-4. While I think we will play more 3-4 I really think we are going to see all kinds of fronts, with all kinds of players.  I happened to stumble on this on YouTube.  He does a really good job breaking down what we used last year from a Hybrid scheme.  Both 3-4 and 4-3.  Also makes a good point of showing that guys that we normally wouldn’t think about putting inside or outside.  We lined up Addison, Butler, Pep and others both inside and outside. It’s all bout creating confusion.  

I am really looking forward to how this plays out this year.  And as long as RR doesn’t turn the keys over to Washington it should be really fun to watch. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are running a 3-4 for sure. You don't draft Burns and Miller if you don't plan on using them to the best of their abilities. We have long athletic LB's who can rush the passer and have the ability to drop into coverage. We needed speed and we finally got it on defense. Burns is not a traditional 4-3 DE and not a 4-3 OLB(though he could probably play it), this pick was made specifically for a 3-4 defense. Drafting Miller in round 4 was the seal of approval.

*Forgot we also signed a 3-4 OLB in Irvin.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Black&BlueBubba said:

So the recent theory is we are going full 3-4. While I think we will play more 3-4 I really think we are going to see all kinds of fronts, with all kinds of players.  I happen to stumble on this on YouTube.  He does a really good job breaking down what we used last year from a Hybrid scheme.  Both 3-4 and 4-3.  Also also makes a good point of showing that guys that we normally wouldn’t think about putting inside or outside.  We lined up Addison, Butler, Pep and others both inside and outside. It’s all bout creating confusion.  

I am really looking forward to how this plays out this year.  And as long as RR doesn’t turn the keys over to Washington it should be really fun to watch. 

 

Very well done IMHO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There seem to be a percentage of fans that seem afraid to let go of the 4-3.  I wonder why?

I'm sure all teams run some variations of the 4-3 and 3-4 regardless of what is considered their base.  Also I'm sure there are some that are more hybrid then others, but at a certain point I wonder if you are diluting your talent.

I'm fine with being versatile but here are only so many resources (draft picks and cap space) to go around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Black&BlueBubba said:

So the recent theory is we are going full 3-4. While I think we will play more 3-4 I really think we are going to see all kinds of fronts, with all kinds of players.  I happen to stumble on this on YouTube.  He does a really good job breaking down what we used last year from a Hybrid scheme.  Both 3-4 and 4-3.  Also also makes a good point of showing that guys that we normally wouldn’t think about putting inside or outside.  We lined up Addison, Butler, Pep and others both inside and outside. It’s all bout creating confusion.  

I am really looking forward to how this plays out this year.  And as long as RR doesn’t turn the keys over to Washington it should be really fun to watch. 

 

Good stuff 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Trill OG said:

We are running a 3-4 for sure. You don't draft Burns and Miller if you don't plan on using them to the best of their abilities. We have long athletic LB's who can rush the passer and have the ability to drop into coverage. We needed speed and we finally got it on defense. Burns is not a traditional 4-3 DE and not a 4-3 OLB(though he could probably play it), this pick was made specifically for a 3-4 defense. Drafting Miller in round 4 was the seal of approval.

*Forgot we also signed a 3-4 OLB in Irvin.

 

I agree we will be running more 3-4 especially with the guys we selected.  But I also think we will see all kinds of fronts. Its not going to be an either- or.  Its going to be all of the above.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, fortyrod said:

This was helpful, thanks!

Yeah I thought it was a really interesting look into what we did last year.  I think people just get stuck into the fact of running one or the other defense in their minds.

For instance above they pointed out that Irvin is a 3-4 OLB. He can be.  But he played at Seattle and Atlanta that run hybrid 4-3’s. And while Burns and Miller looks” like 3-4 guys right now I think they have the ability in the future to run an occasional 4-3  Would’t want to see it all the time but it will depend on who we are playing. 

To be clear I would rather run a 3-4.  But we will change it up depending on the team and situation.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Rubi said:

They just don’t have the personnel for an effective 4-3. The switch is necessary. And they have some pieces for it now  

Very questionable about the personnel for a 3-4 as well. There is a good amount of talent in the front 7 but putting it all together is going to be unconventional.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Black&BlueBubba said:

So the recent theory is we are going full 3-4. While I think we will play more 3-4 I really think we are going to see all kinds of fronts, with all kinds of players.  I happened to stumble on this on YouTube.  He does a really good job breaking down what we used last year from a Hybrid scheme.  Both 3-4 and 4-3.  Also makes a good point of showing that guys that we normally wouldn’t think about putting inside or outside.  We lined up Addison, Butler, Pep and others both inside and outside. It’s all bout creating confusion.  

I am really looking forward to how this plays out this year.  And as long as RR doesn’t turn the keys over to Washington it should be really fun to watch. 

 

After watching the video, I feel a lot more comfortable. RR and crew are going to surprise this year. If not, my dolphin friend will poo talk me all year lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, KSpan said:

Very questionable about the personnel for a 3-4 as well. There is a good amount of talent in the front 7 but putting it all together is going to be unconventional.

Feels like a bunch of stuff thrown against the wall doesn’t it 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think the qualification has changed over time though. A deep ball play used to take 4 to 6 seconds for the receiver to get to that spot on the field. Now a receiver can be there in 2.5. That's less time than most QBs have to set and throw. In my mind a deep route takes time to develop. A crossing route and a deep route can't take the same amount of time at full speed. You can have 4 deep balls on the same drive,  almost 5 if you do 5 20 yard throws goal line to goal line. That doesn't even make sense when you say it out loud. 
    • The sad part is it looks manicured enough that he's aware it's running away from him.  Also, I just wanted to give you some fun loving grief on King Haynes today having a chance to throw a game winning TD, and was wildly errant, and ultimately picked off to end the game.  So happy I won't have to hear anything else about The Golden Calf of Bristol lite ever again watching college football.
    • I just think Panthers believe in Bryce far more than the fans do and he is most likely going to be the QB at least the next two seasons. the real shot of us moving from Bryce is not getting an extension, till then they are going to give him every chance to succeed and I just want to win. 
×
×
  • Create New...