Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Olsen tries to calm down the chicken littles


panthers55

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

I didn't say everyone was negative, I simply said if you are positive and optimistic  posters here call you a homer. Just like you have called me the other day. Again,  believe what you want and think whatever you like.  It doesn't matter to me and I don't care what other folks do. I state my opinion which apparently isn't the popular one these days.

No. You said there were posters that see everything as negative. And no one would give a damn about you if you didn’t attack every word said that wasn’t raining sunshine on the team. Then telling us how your positive outlook is a better way to live. Or you calling a guy slob-bobber because he dared defend Cam from getting all the blame for the OL issues? I’m sure you would NEVER do something like that. 

   Again, no one cares if you wouldn’t act like every comment you don’t like has no merit because it’s negative, but everything you say is credible, even though you’re a self-admitted homer. How are you “unbiased”, but others are just negative. 

   It’s not like I’m alone in this. How many more people need to tell you the exact same thing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Toomers said:

No. You said there were posters that see everything as negative. And no one would give a damn about you if you didn’t attack every word said that wasn’t raining sunshine on the team. Then telling us how your positive outlook is a better way to live. Or you calling a guy slob-bobber because he dared defend Cam from getting all the blame for the OL issues? I’m sure you would NEVER do something like that. 

   Again, no one cares if you wouldn’t act like every comment you don’t like has no merit because it’s negative, but everything you say is credible, even though you’re a self-admitted homer. How are you “unbiased”, but others are just negative. 

   It’s not like I’m alone in this. How many more people need to tell you the exact same thing. 

Wow.  Doubt we can have a conversation with all that animosity. Sorry you feel that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

Don't know why all the negativity. Who said I was better than anyone else? I didn't. In fact the other day I said I prefer to be positive and optimistic but that is me and I speak for myself. No one else 

I just don't agree that objectivity or critical observation has to be negative. We all see what we want to see 

Lol you started this thread to criticize all the chicken littles and you wonder why you get criticized? 

laughing GIF by Landon Moss

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

Wow.  Doubt we can have a conversation with all that animosity. Sorry you feel that way.

 The same guy that will throw a wall of senseless text at anything has nothing for that? It’s not animosity. It’s despising double standards and hypocrisy. 

  Either way, that no conversation part is the desired result anyhow. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Moo Daeng said:

Everyone was bitching in 2015 preseason. The sky was falling in regards to the offense.

Every year seems to be the first football season Huddlers have ever encountered 

The only people saying the sky is falling are the ones pretending like we are champions when we have never won any rings. The majority of people on this site are just discussing our team and what we see and hope and fear.

Our coach is 3-8 following an epic collapse last year but hey, we got embarrassed in a SB after a really fun and exciting year so that shows you how good of a coach he is to lose the biggest game to date in his coaching career. It's also a year where we have to win because we have never lost on an odd year. But there is nothing to discuss because that would be just mean to the team who we are not just fans of but also a cult where we must worship our overload?

Naw, I'll keep enjoying some of the actual insightful posters on here and keep laughing at the cheerleader squad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Toomers said:

 The same guy that will throw a wall of senseless text at anything has nothing for that? It’s not animosity. It’s despising double standards and hypocrisy. 

  Either way, that no conversation part is the desired result anyhow. 

If you didn't want to converse then why did you respond to me in a post not directed to you. You jumped in spoiling for a fight and now just keep up the attack. In my vocabulary animosity and despising something or someone are synonymous. Let's just move on, after all I wasn't talking to you and you don't want to talk to me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

If you didn't want to converse then why did you respond to me in a post not directed to you. You jumped in spoiling for a fight and now just keep up the attack. In my vocabulary animosity and despising something or someone are synonymous. Let's just move on, after all I wasn't talking to you and you don't want to talk to me. 

  You STARTED this thread with the sole purpose of pissing off certain people and your hypocritical ass knows this. It’s exactly why you used the term “chicken littles”. Or is that ok when you do it. Just don’t count. Who was it directed to? I can guarantee I was on that list. You don’t seem to have a problem jumping from thread to thread to quote me. And I haven’t started 5 threads EVER. 

  I despise your two-faced hypocrisy. Seems to be a line forming. But IDGAF about you. You want to throw more crap like this up and act innocent, have at it. But when people respond like you do to negative comments, don’t act shocked like you are above all that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Toomers said:

  You STARTED this thread with the sole purpose of pissing off certain people and your hypocritical ass knows this. It’s exactly why you used the term “chicken littles”. Or is that ok when you do it. Just don’t count. Who was it directed to? I can guarantee I was on that list. You don’t seem to have a problem jumping from thread to thread to quote me. And I haven’t started 5 threads EVER. 

  I despise your two-faced hypocrisy. Seems to be a line forming. But IDGAF about you. You want to throw more crap like this up and act innocent, have at it. But when people respond like you do to negative comments, don’t act shocked like you are above all that. 

Look the title was a little provacative. How boring to say Olsen said the sky isn't falling.. Sure. I figured someone might say they don't think being worried is being a chicken little. Fine. A little debate is good.But honestly the vitriole is quite overblown. Good job derailing the thread with your nasty personal attacks.  Next time skip anything I write or post.   I come here for discussion not insults and personal attacks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, panthers55 said:

Look the title was a little provacative. How boring to say Olsen said the sky isn't falling.. Sure. I figured someone might say they don't think being worried is being a chicken little. Fine. A little debate is good.But honestly the vitriole is quite overblown. Good job derailing the thread with your nasty personal attacks.  Next time skip anything I write or post.   I come here for discussion not insults and personal attacks. Don't take your personal problems out on me.

I don’t have personal problems. Don’t try to deflect from the truth by playing the victim of a bunch of crap YOU started. You make smart ass comments about negative comments daily. You attack people(slob-bobber?) all the time. You provoked all this. And now, once again, you didn’t do nothing. 

  I didn’t derail anything. Plenty of people had an issue with you before I said a word.   I responded when you started that “people” see everything negative cop out. Asked for some names. Still waiting. And now you want to blame my fictional personal problems because you can’t remember which lie you told last. 

  It’s so adorable that when you almost take the blame for what you did, you still have to blame someone else. Gotta keep that “never wrong” persona intact.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Captain Obvious said:

“We’ll put our full squad out there (Week 1) and unleash everything we got,” Olsen said. “and if it’s not good enough, we’ll get back to the drawing board and keep going.”

 

Doesn't look too convincing.

Quiet confidence brosef. He seems ready to rock. Will find out soon 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No. Physical tools alone aren't enough. There are plenty of examples of draft busts to support that. Aost all of them had the physical tools and that wasn't enough. But Bryce is a perfect example of the opposite. Absolutely elite intangibles aren't enough either. If you simply don't have the physical abilities all the football intelligence and work ethic in the world won't be enough to overcome it. Just look to the sidelines every Sunday. We call those people "coaches".
    • As much as I despise Billy B, his philosophy on QBs is how I would approach things if I were a GM. You always keep looking for your next starter.  He has Bledsoe, who got injured and his backup ended up being the GOAT. Even while he had that going, he kept getting his next guy and developing them. When Brady got hurt, Cassel stepped in and went 11-5 and they missed the wild card by dumb luck. Who knows how far they would have gone if they had gotten in. Jimmy Gs career started in NE. There were others, but he always kept looking.  You can't be afraid to keep looking for your next starter, but it looks like we're afraid to look for more than a marginal one. If you're going to offer a $25m contract with incentives, that screams marginal QB. It also screams you're just a transition until we find our guy. After a 10 or 11 win season, he's not accepting that offer. And then you're in a Daniel Jones situation. Do you pay for a year of success and pray it wasn't a one year wonder?  To this point, Bryce has really produced nothing, yet for whatever reason, our FO has not even sniffed at the idea that we need a real QB room with real QBs. Dalton was never starter potential, Plummer was a joke. KP certainly isn't, neither is Grier.  Our approach to the QB room needs to be one of strength not fear. Bring in guys who can compete or who you think can compete. This is THE elite position, in an elite sport, paid premium salary, where production matters. Either you produce or you can lose your job. It's not mean, it's just the reality of the position.  And I'm really just tired of our candy ass approach to it. 
    • If you plug Bryce onto the Pro Bowl roster you might have a chance to compete for a SB. If he's surrounded by top tier talent with a top tier defense on the other side, a field flipping punter, and a kicker good from 60+ you might have a chance. But that means you basically have to recreate Saban's Bama in the NFL and that's impossible... and Bryce couldn't win a championship in that environment either. What the Panthers didn't realize when they got so obsessed with his "PG mentality" was that what they were looking st was a "barely checks the box PG". The basketball equivalent of Bryce would be an undersized PG with marginal athleticism who can make the basic plays but adds nothing to the team in terms of elevating the overall team. Not a great shooter, not a great defender, not a great driver. Just a guy who can basically get you into the offense and be a matador on defense. Basically a placeholder while you look to upgrade the PG position. 
×
×
  • Create New...