Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Front 7: Panthers Sack Counter!


saX man

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, DeAngelo Beason said:

Two points:

First and most importantly, we've only played four games, and each player has missed time this season.

Second - not having sacks does not mean "not effective".  

Mccoy and Short are making a total of 21m this season alone. Poe has been the most effective and best DT so far. McCoy hasnt been too bad. Short has dropped off since getting paid. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, PanthersAddict said:

What's your definition of an effective DL? Our DL is looking great, doing what they should, eating up blockers, stopping the run and collapsing the pocket so the DE/LB can rush the QB. I honestly dont know how much more you can ask for at this point.

48 be likeD-qbEVJVUAAStE3.jpeg.4ef482d6efcad79dd62ab7a0849d7477.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, TheRumGone said:

I’d like to think this too but he’s been underwhelming in the sacks department. 
 

10 sack kk might be gone but even if he doesn’t get that production he’s still a good player who can make impact plays.

If all KK does is soak up two blockers and push the pocket, he's doing his job in this defense.  You can't double team everyone, and I'm pretty sure there aren't too many tackles in the league very excited about the idea of one on one blocking the likes of Addison, Irvin, Burns, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, BrianS said:

If all KK does is soak up two blockers and push the pocket, he's doing his job in this defense.  You can't double team everyone, and I'm pretty sure there aren't too many tackles in the league very excited about the idea of one on one blocking the likes of Addison, Irvin, Burns, etc.

Yeah I agree. This was a thread for sacks which is what I was responding to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...