Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

tough questions: are our wide receivers mediocre?


Recommended Posts

Thinking about it a little more it's a legitimate question to wonder if the staff is maximizing their skillset and if that kind of evolution will actually happen under a defensive head coach. You see other teams like the Packers out there just turning it on after cleaning house in the offseason. Yes Rodgers is fantastic and a future hall of famer, but they won 6 total games last year and so far they're already 7-1 after retooling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Forty-Eight said:

Are you sold on Samuel? You better not if you’re not even sold on Moore

Different reasons.

I feel like Samuel has the tools to be great, but I don't see it happening.

What bothered me with Moore last season was it felt like way too many of his big plays came on gadget runs or end arounds and such rather than passes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

I think they would greatly benefit from an established veteran to take some of the workload off of them and a redzone target. Damn, I'd love to get AJ Green from the Bengals and kill two birds with one stone.

That's technically what Torrey Smith was imagined to be, I thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mediocre is a fair term.  And to be honest, that still might be an upgrade given what we've had in recent years.

CMC is our best RB and WR.  Pure and simple.  I don't know how sustainable it is long-term to run so much of our offense through him, but I get why they do it.

 Olsen knows how to get open at TE, so as a collective group, I think we have enough talent.

Samuel can be inconsistent, but he still is getting open deep at least 2-3 times a game and we can't connect.

Moore makes tough catches and gets nice YAC, but he has also made some awful mistakes you can't have from your WR1.

The WR group isn't setting the world on fire, but they're not bad either.

Norv's offense isn't predicated on having to have a true WR1, but it's also true that with the limited time the offensive line is able to block, these guys aren't getting open consistently.

Nothing was going to matter on a day like today where the defense got gashed so severely on the ground.  It wasn't like SF was destroying us through the air.  They moved the ball some, and Kittle is a beast, but they didn't really need to an aerial attack for the most part.

But to your original point, this group is absolutely mediocre as of now.  I think they have the talent to be better (and I haven't thought that in years past), but it will require better line play to get there.

And these guys (especially Moore and Samuel) to be more consistent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is not a tough question. Our receivers are average. Moore is a solid # 2. Samuel is overrated as hell and should not be back after his rookie contract. Samuel is a nice offensive weapon but not at full time wr. 
 

If we don’t look at QB in the draft, it better be WR. Jeudy, Lamb, Ruggs and Higgins are all instant upgrade over Moore and Samuel. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Different reasons.

I feel like Samuel has the tools to be great, but I don't see it happening.

What bothered me with Moore last season was it felt like way too many of his big plays came on gadget runs or end arounds and such rather than passes.

That last paragraph describes Samuel more so D.J. Moore imo. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No poo tho you might could Jenkins for Legette. They got nothing at WR after the big 2 in Cincy. I don’t think you trade away OL depth. Could get a quality player in cuts. Really that 3-4 end spot what you should be looking for is someone who is stout with long arms and can push back the OL in both the run and pass game for others to make plays…. But we signed Wharton, sometimes I think Evero is a fraud ass nerd who should be an analyst at best.
    • you would honestly probably do Monroe Freeling more of a disservice by putting him in a position where is not yet ready to succeed. .we all knew Monroe Freeling struggled at the NFL combine in drills because of technique related issues & would need time to develop  & now all of a sudden before they even put the pads on Monroe Freeling is somehow a starting LT in the NFL ? if he struggled at the NFL scouting combine what do you actually think is going to happen in a live NFL game at LT ? .even our best LT of all time was not ready to start at LT when he was a rookie & he turned out to be a pretty good darn LT by the name of Jordan Gross ...just saying be patient Young Jedis
    • well i could go on & on but i will just highlight it by saying big difference trust me from the SEC & NFL.it's honestly like comparing apples & oranges especially when you are talking about a  LT. in the NFL you are going up against the most athletic freaks of nature the world has to offer . .the NFL also has much more exotic & complicated defensive schemes than what they are used to seeing at Georgis &  finally but most importantly you have to learn how to master complex bio mechanics where the body kick steps instantly as a reaction to these world class athletes rush without really making a conscious effort it's more of a learned muscle memory  & it can take thousands upon thousands of reps to master rproper technique for a LT in the NFL especially if you are still very raw like Monroe Freeling is    ...just saying 
×
×
  • Create New...