Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trade Deadline News


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, t96 said:

I probably wouldn’t do it but let’s say that move was enough to get us wins against the Packers, Seahawks and Saints once, then into the playoffs to compete... Is that not worth a late 2nd? And it’s no guarantee he’d walk in the offseason. He could easily have 2-3 more elite years left in him

If I felt that our DBs we our weak point, and we were only 1 guy away from a serious push?  Sure.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know this wouldn’t be popular in the slightest but if I’m Hurney and I know Cam isn’t coming back until after Green Bay at the earliest, I’d think long and hard about selling. We aren’t beating GB without Cam. So at minimum we’re at 4 losses in an extremely competitive conference with some tough games remaining. 
 

Teams are giving up a lot these days. It’s something that should at the very least be discussed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, *FreeFua* said:

I know this wouldn’t be popular in the slightest but if I’m Hurney and I know Cam isn’t coming back until after Green Bay at the earliest, I’d think long and hard about selling. We aren’t beating GB without Cam. So at minimum we’re at 4 losses in an extremely competitive conference with some tough games remaining. 
 

Teams are giving up a lot these days. It’s something that should at the very least be discussed

Who would you sell that would be worth buying?

I'm not so sure that taking that route wouldn't just be Hurney setting the table for his replacement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

I know this wouldn’t be popular in the slightest but if I’m Hurney and I know Cam isn’t coming back until after Green Bay at the earliest, I’d think long and hard about selling. We aren’t beating GB without Cam. So at minimum we’re at 4 losses in an extremely competitive conference with some tough games remaining. 

Teams are giving up a lot these days. It’s something that should at the very least be discussed

I'd trade anybody for the right price, but my idea of "the right price" is generally pretty high.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We ain’t going to do poo... we going to sit back and watch everyone make moves to get better. “Answer is on the roster” Rivera won’t let us do anything. Don’t get hopes up. Little over an hour left and no word we’ve kicked tires on anyone

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Catufb85 said:

We ain’t going to do poo... we going to sit back and watch everyone make moves to get better. “Answer is on the roster” Rivera won’t let us do anything. Don’t get hopes up. Little over an hour left and no word we’ve kicked tires on anyone

It's what we do and why we lose. We need a LT in a bad way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Who would you sell that would be worth buying?

I'm not so sure that taking that route wouldn't just be Hurney setting the table for his replacement.

I’m sure some teams would be interested in McCoy, Irvin, Olsen, Bradberry and Shaq are both free agents to be. Anyone on 1 year deals. 
 

If your plan isn’t to bring both (JB and ST) back then I’m of the belief you should get something for them before you lose them and get nothing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...