Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Seahawks claim Gordon off waivers


mc52beast

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, TheMostInterestingMan said:

Intentionally left games off to fit my narrative did I? Lol okay. He has two 100 yard games in the last 25 games he’s played. How’s that? Less biased for you? xD

 

For the record, it has nothing to do with his off field issues. I’m a full on supporter of legalization and a recreational user myself. However, I get really annoyed with fans who hear a name that was once relevant 5-6 years ago and immediately say “wow we are stupid for not signing him!”

100 yards is not a litmus test. Whether you agree or not, 1000 yards in a season is the litmus test, or ~67 yards per game. 

Nobody said we were "stupid" for not signing him. That's hyperbole. At the end of the day, nobody really expected us to sign him if we're being honest. Would it have helped us to sign him? No one will ever know. And that's pretty much the bottom line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/2/2019 at 10:46 AM, TheMostInterestingMan said:

LOL and this is exactly the delusion I’m talking about. Gordon hasn’t eclipsed 100 yards once this season. He had one single 100 yard game last season. 

 

In 3 years he’s had two games with 100 yards. That is... actually bang average. 

He’s been irrelevant since 2013 and people still act as though he’s Randy Moss.

 

366F16E9-2BCF-4E3D-8AC5-A99EED65026B.png

 

But he did avg 18 yards per catch in 2018 which means he is a deep threat. Something the Panthers cant seem to ever get outside of one year(2015).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You guys are just going to have to accept the fact that Dan Morgan is a mid GM best case scenario currently. I used to have people get very belligerent over defending Scott Fitterer too. And that's not hyperbole. People used to go to bat for that guy like he was blood related. We have a truckload invested in the OL and what do we have to show for it? The whole unit is already banged up including one of our big signings. Even without all that the group has largely take a step back from last year in pass protection. Then you get to the QB room and there's only two conclusions you can make about Dan Morgan. Either he deliberately ignored it two years in a row on his own accord or he took orders from Tepper to do so. Either scenario says he's not fit to be an NFL GM.
    • Frank, ceding control of the defense in no way verifies that Tepper told Canales to bench Young.    It certainly buttresses the idea that Canales would need permission to bench him but that is as far as you can take it.    After that it is pure speculation and it doesn’t make sense. 
    • Uhh, okay yes that happened. I didn’t like the pick either I am a 3rd or later RB guy. Always. Actually hated the CMC pick too. Hated the Stewart pick.  No one wants to talk about trading the #39 in that draft and what he did with that.  Got #52, #155, and the Rams 2025 2nd to boot.   The 52 and 155 plus our 142 5th rounder to go up for a Brooks Everyone wants to forget about the 2025 2nd for that Rams trade  which was used to move up for Scourton.  That Rams trade down was a great deal for us.     
×
×
  • Create New...