Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The London Chargers?


Raleigh PF

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

Ya, not saying it’s impossible. Just a nightmare.

Totally agree, but this is talking about the Chargers here...one of the, if not the poorest team in the league.

Spanos wants to make money, he wasn't doing that in SD, looks like he may not be in LA....so......here we are.

I think that St. Louis would be a good landing spot for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, thefuzz said:

Maybe, just maybe, the coaches need to figure out a way for these guys to be more adaptable?

The teams try to make these young men robots.  Again, I'm not saying it's not an issue, but it's not as big of an issue as most are making it out to be.

Yeah, natural biological circadian rhythms are super easy to overcome.

It's not a huge issue traveling within the continental U.S., but it will be for trying to manage the schedule of a team based in London.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, thefuzz said:

Totally agree, but this is talking about the Chargers here...one of the, if not the poorest team in the league.

Spanos wants to make money, he wasn't doing that in SD, looks like he may not be in LA....so......here we are.

I think that St. Louis would be a good landing spot for them.

I think there are several good possible landing spots for the Chargers...

 

 

... provided Spanos stays in San Diego and sells the team to somebody else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, jfra78 said:

Can we have Cincinnati and Miami too?

Why not... 8 team divisions, 17 game seasons, play divisional teams twice and play the team in the other three divisions that finished the opposite of where you finished... ex) Finish 1st in East division play 8th in West Division. Teams that wins the Super Bowl gets the top 3 picks of the draft with no salary cap penalty.

 

NFC South

1. Carolina Panthers

2. Cleveland Browns

3. New York Jets

4. Tampa Bay Buccaneers 

5. Miami Dolphins

6. Cincinnati Bengals

7. Arizona Cardinals

8. Washington Redskins 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Riverboat Ron said:

Why not... 8 team divisions, 17 game seasons, play divisional teams twice and play the team in the other three divisions that finished the opposite of where you finished... ex) Finish 1st in East division play 8th in West Division. Teams that wins the Super Bowl gets the top 3 picks of the draft with no salary cap penalty.

 

NFC South

1. Carolina Panthers

2. Cleveland Browns

3. New York Jets

4. Tampa Bay Buccaneers 

5. Miami Dolphins

6. Cincinnati Bengals

7. Arizona Cardinals

8. Washington Redskins 

Superbowl every year! Make it happen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He had games where he was a top 10 QB that week, vs Saints, Falcons, Eagles, Chiefs, Bucs.  Amazing performances that I think show what he can do consistently.  
    • We both know there's more that goes into batted passes than just the height of the QB. Most people here have readily acknowledged this and there were numerous discussions about it before we drafted Young. But if you are presenting a POV that Bryce's height hasn't tied to issues with his footwork then there's nothing anyone is going to be able to say to sway you and you know this. Even beyond the footwork I recall a redzone play where Bryce couldn't see around his right tackle at all where a receiver was waiting practically alone in the end zone for a touchdown. There are real world circumstances that are going to show up over the course of the upcoming season and it's up to Bryce and Dave Canales to make adjustments and do anything they can to mitigate negative instances and yes that begins with Bryce's footwork again. Thanks for your time. Have a nice weekend.
    • I'm arguing that should those supposed deficiencies, like height or pocket footwork, be as consequential as you and others have claimed, then there would be a clear, observable impact in the data. That's not unreasonable. For example, batted passes are often used as a size-related concern (see: Baker Mayfield), yet Bryce ranked among the lowest in deflections at the line. If his stature is such a limitation, why isn't it showing up there? Or are you suggesting that's why his passing yards fall short of your expectations? If the latter, I would hope that you're not discounting yards left on the field due to drops (of which he led the league in).  Also, asking for specific, measurable benchmarks isn't aggression... it's accountability. If that feels uncomfortable, it might be worth reflecting on how much of your anti-Bryce argument is grounded in subjective perception rather than objective metrics. So, again: do you have any specific KPIs beyond total passing yardage, height, and weight that you consider relevant to evaluating whether a QB is top-10? If you want to add YPA and passing yards per game to those metrics, that's fair, just be clear about it. But let's not pretend that asking for clarity is some kind of provocation. I'm simply trying to understand the actual criteria... not just the vibes.
×
×
  • Create New...