Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

QB controversy is over

GoPanthers123

By GoPanthers123,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Uwontdoit81 Community Regular

Uwontdoit81

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, GoPanthers123 said:

Carry on.  We got a tough schedule ahead and you are onboard with who we have, or if not then it’s because Ron has to go. Allen didn’t warrant any hate by any of his actions on or off the field.

Rooting against Allen makes no sense anymore.

When did it ever?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Adb6368 Proficient

Adb6368

Posted
Posted

This may be hard to hear... our best case is that Kyle Allen proves to be a serviceable starter so that we can cut cam and use his cap space on other positions. 

Outside of Brady the key to winning a super bowl is a good quarterback on a friendly deal. That’s not hyperbole that’s a fact 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
332nd Mentor

332nd

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Adb6368 said:

This may be hard to hear... our best case is that Kyle Allen proves to be a serviceable starter so that we can cut cam and use his cap space on other positions. 

Outside of Brady the key to winning a super bowl is a good quarterback on a friendly deal. That’s not hyperbole that’s a fact 

Why outside of Brady? He makes team friendly deals because his wife has 8-10 times his net worth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, 332nd said:

Why outside of Brady? He makes team friendly deals because his wife has 8-10 times his net worth.

This. One of the huge advantages the Pats have enjoyed with Brady is that he has constantly given them a very team friendly deal. He makes average to below average starting QB money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

The OP stated: QB controversy is over.

Based on today's events, not sure why anyone would choose to disagree (at least until the Allen vs. Grier debate heats up).

Speaking for myself, it's because I don't believe there was one.

I define a QB controversy as a team having to decide between two viable choices.

After week two, Newton was no longer a viable choice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
NanuqoftheNorth Grand Master

NanuqoftheNorth

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Speaking for myself, it's because I don't believe there was one.

I define a QB controversy as a team having to decide between two viable choices.

After week two, Newton was no longer a viable choice.

Well, until today, there was some hope that Cam would return at some point during the regular season.

That hope generated intense debate for many fans as to how and when Cam should reclaim his role as starting QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
Just now, NanuqoftheNorth said:

Well, until today, there was some hope that Cam would return at some point during the regular season.

That hope generated intense debate for many fans as to how and when Cam should reclaim his role as starting QB.

I don't think there ever really was any hope.

Now one key difference in terms here: I believe a quarterback controversy only happens within the confines of the team itself. If you're talking about a quarterback controversy among fans, that's another story. 

Also, you're a poo poo head :Eyes_Emoji_42x42:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      We joke about how the NFL has a script for the season. But maybe it's not a joke?

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • rayzor
      Our guys working their azz's off to be the winners they know they are!!

      By rayzor · Posted

      Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Rocky Davis
      NHL Draft 2025

      By Rocky Davis · Posted

      Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...