Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Supposing we do hire McDaniels, Caserio or both


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

How are you going to feel about bringing in people from"The Patriot Way" when we've bashed them as cheaters for years and years?

(heck, McDaniels was reportedly caught doing some shenanigans in Denver)

Related: Does the revelation that David Tepper is close to the Kraft family affect your opinion of him in any way?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you're not cheating, you're not trying

There was an anecdote on Robert Mays podcast yesterday, where he said he spoke to Rivera about using technology on the sidelines, and Rivera told him he wouldn't use it, not because it wasn't effective, but because he felt it was unfair to the opposing coach and lacked integrity

Literally, Rivera refused to use technology because it was 'unfair'.  Big reason Denver knew all of our plays in the Superbowl was how naive Rivera was.

In case you dont believe it, here's the podcast

https://www.theringer.com/2019/12/5/20997877/ron-rivera-fired-whos-next-plus-brady-vs-mahomes-and-a-stacked-week-14

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

Even if we start winning like crazy?

I will leave the puppies be. 

I just can’t stomach that guy. Maybe I’m being unfair but to me everything about him screams douchebag par egg say lontz.

On top of everything else he drafted The Golden Calf of Bristol in the first. I just don’t think I’m at a meaningful risk of confronting that reality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bobowilson said:

If you're not cheating, you're not trying

There was an anecdote on Robert Mays podcast yesterday, where he said he spoke to Rivera about using technology on the sidelines, and Rivera told him he wouldn't use it, not because it wasn't effective, but because he felt it was unfair to the opposing coach and lacked integrity

Literally, Rivera refused to use technology because it was 'unfair'.  Big reason Denver knew all of our plays in the Superbowl was how naive Rivera was.

In case you dont believe it, here's the podcast

https://www.theringer.com/2019/12/5/20997877/ron-rivera-fired-whos-next-plus-brady-vs-mahomes-and-a-stacked-week-14

Yikes!

Yeah, I'm pretty sure a lot of other coaches aren't really that concerned about being fair to the opponent. The Patriots sure as hell aren't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 1of10Charnatives said:

I will leave the puppies be. 

I just can’t stomach that guy. Maybe I’m being unfair but to me everything about him screams douchebag par egg say lontz.

On top of everything else he drafted The Golden Calf of Bristol in the first. I just don’t think I’m at a meaningful risk of confronting that reality.

The general read from people is that McDaniel's was given way too much power too soon when he should have been concentrating only on coaching.

Is that true? Don't know, but if he's hired here I certainly hope it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bobowilson said:

If you're not cheating, you're not trying.

You would be hard pressed to type something I disagreed with more strongly when it comes to sports. I have always found this to be a rationalization of cheaters to attempt to excuse their behavior. 

True champions do not cheat.

Period.

Having said that, I don’t disagree that if Rivera refused to use technology on the sideline that wasn’t specifically forbidden by the league, he was being naive and probably just rationalizing his own dislike of technology. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Realistically speaking, there is a certain amount of hypocrisy that comes with being a sports fan.  Your opinion of certain players and actions frequently has a lot to do with who they play for.

I suspect if this happens, we'll get the chance to see just how deep our own sports hypocrisy goes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, 1of10Charnatives said:

You would be hard pressed to type something I disagreed with more strongly when it comes to sports. I have always found this to be a rationalization of cheaters to attempt to excuse their behavior. 

True champions do not cheat.

Period.

Having said that, I don’t disagree that if Rivera refused to use technology on the sideline that wasn’t specifically forbidden by the league, he was being naive and probably just rationalizing his own dislike of technology. 

Well I think the pile of trophies in Foxboro disagrees with you......

The truth is, professional and revenue college sports are rife with cheating. It's no surprise, because millions and billions of dollars are at stake. It is no different than insider trading or some of the financial industry misconduct that has been exposed over the past 20 years. When that much money is involved, people will take short cuts. It is human nature.

It doesn't make it right, it just makes it what it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, bobowilson said:

If you're not cheating, you're not trying

There was an anecdote on Robert Mays podcast yesterday, where he said he spoke to Rivera about using technology on the sidelines, and Rivera told him he wouldn't use it, not because it wasn't effective, but because he felt it was unfair to the opposing coach and lacked integrity

Literally, Rivera refused to use technology because it was 'unfair'.  Big reason Denver knew all of our plays in the Superbowl was how naive Rivera was.

In case you dont believe it, here's the podcast

https://www.theringer.com/2019/12/5/20997877/ron-rivera-fired-whos-next-plus-brady-vs-mahomes-and-a-stacked-week-14

Welp. That pissed me off. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Doubling tripling and quadrupling down on this subject in defense of the pick is reminiscent of a certain mindset that has overtaken the political world. This conversation will become less contentious and dragged out to the point of becoming a dead beaten horse if rational minds can simply agree that we made a mistake missed on a potential franchise center and we will learn from it. All this coping is unnecessary.
    • Here in lies the rub that the supporting posters continue to ignore. He wasn’t a 2nd round pick in the 2025 class, especially with an ACL tear. It was a dumb pick for any GM who looks ahead to determine values. C and CB were much better values than an injured RB in 2024. If a RB isn’t even playing much in 2024, you have to compare him to 2025. We’re beating a dead horse but only because the defense of the pick is almost comical at this point. We’ve made a ton of poo picks and moves/non trades while Morgan was GM and the assistant GM. It happens, we don’t have to jump through hoops to act like we just had some really bad luck. The 2025 draft class is unknown so far but damn it felt way better afterwards for the first time in a long time. Embrace the potential and stop stamping guaranteed on the box of poo of the 2018-2024 drafts. We are were we aware because of them and 2025 has to hit so we can get past the 7 win max in 7 year hurdle. Also, “flashed his talent” isn’t 9 carries for 22 yards. His one reception for 18 yards isn’t a flash with 11 other touches for 27 yards. He hasn’t proven anything. We have no idea if he’ll contribute in 2026.
    • Oh for those tired of the Mannings I have bad news, Peytons son Marshal already has college teams after him and he isn't even in HS until this fall...   I'd wager we have two Mannings in the NFL in 2030
×
×
  • Create New...