Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Rhule Run Game/Offensive Minded/Strong Defense


Varking

Recommended Posts

The last three years at Baylor his leading rushers had:

2017: 445 yards (QB 3rd most rushing attempts but not lead rusher)

2018: 573 yards (QB most rushing attempts but not lead rusher)

2019: 655 yards (QB most rushing attempts but not lead rusher)

Charlie Brewer, their QB, who did not lead the team in rushing yards, was their leading rusher in attempts two of the last three years. 

Temple:

2013: 613 yards (QB 3rd most rushing attempts but not lead rusher)

2014: 324 yards (QB had the most rushing attempts as yards. 3.1 YPC average)

2015: Jahad Thomas 1,262 rushing yards and 17 rushing TDS. QB was second in yards and attempts again. 

2016: 953 rushing yards. QB still had 100 rushes but two running backs this year ran for over 900 yards. 

PJ Walker was the starting QB at Temple all four years Rhule coached there. 

Charlie Brewer was the starting QB at Baylor all three years Rhule coached there. 

This guys history is he tends to ignore the RB and let the QB run himself in and out of trouble. 2019 was the only time Rhule lead a college team to a top 50 offense in his 7 years of coaching. He was, however, top 20 in defense 4 times in his 7 years. Not sure how he is getting the label of offensive minded coach when his teams historically have amazing defenses and average to below average offenses. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this actually shows why he was labeled an offensives minded coach; because his ideal philosophy is lining up in 22 personnel and running the ball. he's a power run game guy who adjusted what he calls in accordance with the talent he has on the roster. he's capable of changing, even if he hates it. he called running the RPO his deal with the devil, because he figured out he had to do it to win even though he didn't like it.

that's what a good coach does. they don't try to fit a square peg in a round whole. we heard for 7 years "Cam needs to turn into a pocket passer this year" instead of "We need to call plays to Cam's strengths" and that will change now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, rodeo said:

this actually shows why he was labeled an offensives minded coach; because his ideal philosophy is lining up in 22 personnel and running the ball. he's a power run game guy who adjusted what he calls in accordance with the talent he has on the roster. he's capable of changing, even if he hates it. he called running the RPO his deal with the devil, because he figured out he had to do it to win even though he didn't like it.

that's what a good coach does. they don't try to fit a square peg in a round whole. we heard for 7 years "Cam needs to turn into a pocket passer this year" instead of "We need to call plays to Cam's strengths" and that will change now.

Usually a guy is labeled offensive minded because they excel at something in particular. His run games never really translated to points. His defenses carried them to the point they didn't need to put up points to win games in college. Again, he had a top 50 offense, only one time in his 7 years as a head coach, this year. He seems to "win" with his offense through having outstanding defenses. And running the QB hasn't been a strength for any of his team to endorse the not putting a square peg into a round whole statement because his QBs haven't been good runners. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Rhule coached NFL offensive line. 

That needs to be considered.

Correct. He was an assistant to the offensive line coach for one year. But this, again, doesn't really promote that he is some offensive genius or great offensive mind. I am not trying to dog the guy. He is going to be here for the next 6 years so I am going to support him and hope for the best. The analytics suggest other than this year he was a get the lead and run a billion times for 2.5-3.1 yards per carry type of coach. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Varking said:

Not sure how he is getting the label of offensive minded coach

I actually just said the same thing as I sit here and look at the teams he’s coached and stats and what not.

Curious to see the replies in this thread because right now I don’t see it either

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, theDIRTYcode2 said:

I'm not sure Charlie Brewer will play again after the amount of concussions he received this year. We knocked him out of the Sugar Bowl with one. 

I was just naming the QBs to give reference he never moved on from a starter and ran a ton of plays with his QB as a runner. I dont know if the other QB had health issues or not but you can likely attribute some of the issues Brewer has with his offensive play caller asking him to run so much even after the first concussion, or second or... You get it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DubE_4MR said:

He wants to score and stop the other team from scoring lol.

That is literally every coach. You say well rounded but the numbers don't actually suggest that. The numbers show his teams show up to play solid to great defense but don't do a great job scoring compared to the rest of the country. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, mc52beast said:

Interesting. I would have thought his offenses were better than that considering how everyone has said he’s an offensive genius. 

Imagine doing that with a college football version of Taylor Heinicke at QB and Reggie Bonnafon.

Baylor doesn't have near the talent of other P5 schools.

2 years ago when he arrived.  No parent wanted their kid to go there coming off the Art Briles thing and under the NCAA investigation.  

With only 1 commit.  He scrapped up some players and still produced with what he was handed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As for special teams:

His team was 16 of 20 on field goals and 57/57 on XP in 2019. 

43/47 XP and 15/24 on field goals in 2018.

30/31 XP and 20/24 in 2017. 

52/52 XP with two different kickers and 25/29 in 2016.

44/45 and 23/28 in 2015.

32/32 and 15/24 in 2014. 

32/25 and 3/5 in 2013.

His teams have been great and defense and special teams. Its been the offense that has lagged behind. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ncfan said:

Imagine doing that with a college football version of Taylor Heinicke at QB and Reggie Bonnafon.

Baylor doesn't have near the talent of other P5 schools.

2 years ago when he arrived.  No parent wanted their kid to go there coming off the Art Briles thing and under the NCAA investigation.  

With only 1 commit.  He scrapped up some players and still produced with what he was handed

Im not saying he is a bad coach. But his defenses still showed out each year. His special teams showed out every year but one. The offense only crossed top 50 one time in 7 years. In the three phases of the game, where he is a head coach, defense and special teams have been head and shoulders above offense. Those lowly recruits apply to defense and special teams as well,. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...