Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Prerequisites to Assistant GM interviews


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Mind you, teams can still say "yes" to interview requests if they want to, but if they aren't feeling especially generous or just prefer to hang on to their front office personnel, Getzenberg and Cabot confirm they have grounds to block us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Snake said:

I seriously doubt we get a real candidate for this position for that exact reason. 

We could, as long as 1) somebody is okay with what they feel is a lateral move 2) the person we're looking at is out on contract and doesn't need permission or 3) the person we want is fairly low on the totem pole (but then why would we want them?)

But yeah, it might not be so easy.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Pantha-kun said:

If Tepper believes in Hurney so much then why does he need an assistant GM?

His official statement was that you really need two people to run a team, but that could easily be bullsh-t. Lots of people have speculated that whoever gets this job is basically Marty's replacement after the next draft.

But if teams aren't willing to let desired targets interview for what they see as a lateral move, then what?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everyone in here blaming Hurney for this. Did it ever occur to any of you that this might be a stipulation of Rhule? That he doesn't want someone else having final say over the roster, and Hurney sticking around so far has been contingent on his being agreeable to not having full say? I think it's more likely that's the case, and everyone is letting Hurney take the heat. No way Tepper throws that much at Rhule and then lets the outgoing GM stop him from getting top flight, long term talent. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, PanthersBigD said:

Everyone in here blaming Hurney for this. Did it ever occur to any of you that this might be a stipulation of Rhule? That he doesn't want someone else having final say over the roster, and Hurney sticking around so far has been contingent on his being agreeable to not having full say? I think it's more likely that's the case, and everyone is letting Hurney take the heat. No way Tepper throws that much at Rhule and then lets the outgoing GM stop him from getting top flight, long term talent. 

i'm with you that rhule and his associates have been better at talent evaluation because of having to be.   i think you're right about final say, and i hope final say on draft picks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, PanthersBigD said:

Everyone in here blaming Hurney for this. Did it ever occur to any of you that this might be a stipulation of Rhule? That he doesn't want someone else having final say over the roster, and Hurney sticking around so far has been contingent on his being agreeable to not having full say? I think it's more likely that's the case, and everyone is letting Hurney take the heat. No way Tepper throws that much at Rhule and then lets the outgoing GM stop him from getting top flight, long term talent. 

No. This is 100% Hurney. If it was rhule he’d be putting his own guy in there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, PanthersBigD said:

Everyone in here blaming Hurney for this. Did it ever occur to any of you that this might be a stipulation of Rhule? That he doesn't want someone else having final say over the roster, and Hurney sticking around so far has been contingent on his being agreeable to not having full say? I think it's more likely that's the case, and everyone is letting Hurney take the heat. No way Tepper throws that much at Rhule and then lets the outgoing GM stop him from getting top flight, long term talent. 

Maybe because he specifically said he didn't want personnel control?

Mike Garafolo reported it a while back when he was being considered for the Giants. He wants control over his staff and aspects of the program, but wasn't looking for final say on personnel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Maybe because he specifically said he didn't want personnel control?

Mike Garafolo reported it a while back when he was being considered for the Giants. He wants control over his staff and aspects of the program, but not personnel.

He also said he was staying at Baylor. People say a lot of things. I'm not suggesting anything sinister like him wanting to be some kind of autocrat, simply that perhaps he wants someone 'on the same page/part of his process' to be the one pulling the trigger on draft day, and this guy wasn't it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Maybe because he specifically said he didn't want personnel control?

Mike Garafolo reported it a while back when he was being considered for the Giants. He wants control over his staff and aspects of the program, but wasn't looking for final say on personnel.

booooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!       not at you, but at hurney

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That new home page looking sexy and thicc
    • Serious question:  Why LG and not RG?  There may be something I do not know, but Hunt's contract is huge and he could be let go after this season (post june 1 cut) and it would save the Panthers a ton of money.  Extending him would be paying a G who is in his mid 30s guaranteed money (and I do not see that as a terrible thing).  So if we release him at age 31, we save $19m.  I like him, but at 31, will he be worth the mega contract?   LG Damien Lewis has actually outperformed Hunt and he is a year younger.  He would also save less vs. the cap and leave less in the dead cap pool.  While his current contract expires after the 2027 season, he is a better prospect (IMO) to extend because only 50% of his current contract was guaranteed.  Here are his contract numbers.   Now, getting to Ickey--he could want LT money if he is offered a second contract.  If we pay him LT money to play either G positions, we are likely overpaying.  Secondly, the injury he suffered could be one that limits his productivity.  Ickey was improving, but he was an average LT.  The only way I re-sign Ickey is to have him accept a G contract and make a lot of it incentive based.     I feel like I am missing something, but in my mind, Ickey was always a guard if you consider the fact that he is an average OT and would be a great G.  Is that still the case (injury)?
    • Supplemental draft uses picks from next year. So a team were to draft him in the 1st, their upcoming 1st next draft would no longer be available. There have been some notable players that were obtained in the supplemental draft, such as Kosar. It doesn't necessarily happen every year either, and is more on a as needed basis. The gambling trouble is a big red flag for teams, and maybe pushes him down to a 4th? Not sure a team would use a 1st on him.
×
×
  • Create New...